/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10130128
please elaborate, or else you will have to suck on my well-formed crohn turd

the second bump
bump
*sucks a well-formed, 4-on-the-bristol-chart turd*

bump
*sucks a well-formed, 4-on-the-bristol-chart turd*

*sucks a well-formed, 4-on-the-bristol-chart turd*

>>10130095
she was a student of Whitehead? do you remember anything from that book? If not, it's ok, I can do some research on it, thanks for the suggestion
*sucks a well-formed, 4-on-the-bristol-chart turd*

>>10130077
FOOL! SILENCE! Don't you bark in front of me, don't you mentally defecate in my face you vile pig, you putrid son of a bitch, you disgusting swine! you swill-sucking piglet! you piggot!

>>10130077
Wrong, loser. While you are doing mathematics, people are having sex. While you are dedicating your life to an assumption, i.e. "math is the best thing in life", others are living life dangerously like Nietzsche said is cool to do. While you solve integrals, cool boys are having sex, licking pussy, swallowing spit, eating, pissing, having fun with their lives, man!
Morality is based on biology and don't you take my word on it: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/morality-biology/#OveBasIssQueDis

>>10130077
>Not an argument.
That's not an argument, turd-sucker.

I don't know what the main idea behind formal logic is (think hilbert style logic, propositional logic, predicate logic, PL+natural deduction, etc., => vs <=>, modus ponens, etc.)
in math, are proofs made with formal logic? can you formalize any math argument? inb4 principia mathematica, I'm asking what the fuck is "iff" or "if... then..." in mathematical proofs. Can it be translated to propositional logic or is it informal logic, is it an informal argument that should convince the reader about the truth of the proved thing? is it informal like solving a law case is? proof elegance and etc. are just measures of how eloquently you defended your client?