/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6961402
Meh, not my fault I was born here.
>>6961403
Kurwa is a swear word, like "fuck", try not to use it openly. Warsaw polytechnics is best in country, I think there are some multilang studies. However if I were you Id go to Denmark or Netherlands.

>>6961359
Im not op, I forgot to change name in last post.
Sure.
Mainly their opinions are regarding double slit experiment, observator that can influence experiment via subconsciousness and some Schrodinger cat bullshit.
Last time I provided the link to wikipedia where its written that S's cat was a mockery, and I explain what happens at quantum scale step by step. Its beneficial to use Bohmian mechanics to explain QM, it sounds more natural for ppl.
2 of the 3 ppl last time got converted, I treat that as a success. Pic is relevant, one of the oppinions about my post on native movie forums.

>>6918702
>programming
>"hello world!"
>"get a numerical solution to differential eq"
>dont know what a dif. eq is
>"get a numerical solution to the integral?
>dont know what integral is
I think you have misinterpreted what "programming" means. I think you agree with me it is more than reproducing lines, if you really want to approach a problem yourself.

>>6918679
Please faggot, arbitrary experiments does not imply arbitrary results, I agree with the existence of zero though.

>>6872690
Why?

I tried to do plain linar approximation
f(x,y) = 8 + a (x-1) + b (y-2)
but then the three cases don't math.
If they imply second order approximation
f(x,y) = 8 + a (x-1) + b (y-2) + c (x-1)^2 + d (y-2)^2
then you got a parameter too much.

If they mean somthing else, I don't know.

>>6756214
thx for the answor.

>notably that L^1 and L^Infinity are reflexive
I'm 13 and what is this?

>>6719641
>So my advice is, in short, to become a Catholic, because it's the true religion, and because it's the solution to your spiritual anguish, and your hope of salvation.
>mfw read all of that for that

>>6719643
>Find a passion
how

>>6719616
I arrived at that question but I reject consumerism/materialism. I can't see how there can be a connection. Any intelligent person can see that with a huge number of mutually exclusive beliefs present, in the sense of finding truth they all essentially are wrong, or may as well be. Although I have found some degree of use out of buddhism/meditation to calm my mind and reduce negativity-- but that doesnt solve the issue of what to do with my life.

>>6716336
Unplug the microwave first though.

>>6715848
It's only around 50% lethal anyway.

>>6712966
There isn't some kind of you-fluid that ties your experience to a specific set of atoms. Probably. It's hard to say since it gets right into the heart of the mind-body problem.

>>6712756
If they're going to automate themselves then it's more cost effective for them to do it while there's still other stuff left to automate.

>>6712667
It's been a hell of a lot longer than seven weeks for me, but then again I was on a bunch of other meds too. At least you're probably in better shape than me, OP.

>>6669347
Oh, fuck off.

>>6639417
Not really. I've been under before.
Time doesn't pass and nothing interesting happens.

>>6639413
Insatiable curiosity

>>6604414
oh good.
I thought I knew nothing about rocks because I thought it was mica.

>>6579483
So you think this is not legit? That the voltage of 1-2 A came from actually house power lines?

Maybe its time for you to move to >>>/b/ fucking stupid american eunuch.

>>6566486
>I am soooo clever I did a meanie comment to op hes gonna feel so bad cuz hes stopidddddd
Transated for you guys!

>>6559323
Oh, here we go:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logistic_function

``The logistic function is the solution of the simple first-order non-linear differential equation:

f'(x) = f(x)*(1-f(x))

"

which corresponds to vaguely exponential growth when f(x) is close to 0, so that 1-f(x) is close to 1, and so that f'(x) = f(x)*(1-f(x)) is close to f(x), and a limiting factor (1-f(x)) that symbolizes the population being f(x) less efficient at reproducing as the population approaches its maximum of 1.

I actually remember this being mentioned briefly in diff. eq. 1, with more variables, but it's the same graph up to some scaling and translating.

>>6559302
>>6559306
Is there a reason to use 1/[1+e^(-t)] and not, say, arctan(t)? The wiki page makes it seem like they're all good, but more in-depth comments would be really interesting. Maybe one is computationally more efficient, or one has more natural analytic properties, or something?

>>6461975
sin(2pi*n) I guess

>>6459010
>no subtitle
oh, I'm wrong about that too