/sci/ - Science & Math

i personally think we are ready for a reknowned scientific forum, however we do not know of any, we will research those on our own but it would be greatly appreciated if anyone here knows of some at hand

>>1572852
please elaborate as i do not know of this concept

>>1572841
we are simply utilizing 4chan as a forum that will not immediately disregard our theory as hobsquabble allowing us to find a think-tank with enough people who could possible have similar thinking to take this to said reknowned scientific forums and not be immediately ignored.

>>1572827
no

>>1572807
i am not trying to troll you idiots and neither is flotsam
we simply are moving up the chains of different resources trying to obtain proof or disproof of our theory.
next from here is moving on to reknowned scientific forums to get even more powerful proof or disproof.

>>1572791
also, this is difficult to explain and yet again i must obtain data to back up my statement, however:
the interaction between the neutron and antimatter is intended to essentially turn the matter into energy to eliminate its mass, then return the energy back into matter... millions of times a second, in a cyclical function.
this will achieve the function of the mass as S
and return almost all mass of S to a pure energy state, in which mass doesn't quite exist, then by inversing the "AC" charge, the energy returns to mass, recreating S and allowing the functions of S that were intended to function.

>>1572772
my basis for "electromagnetic current"
"turning on and off mass" of an object is based in that the mass used is neutrons and antimatter particles antiprotons and antielectrons.
i will attempt to uncover some research or data to back this up.

>>1572718
also, it is not AC current, it will be antimatter powered. using anitprotons instead of electrons to achieve a negatively charged neutron object, and it will use antielectrons instead of protons to achieve a positively charged neutron object.
since they are not incorporating antielectrons and electrons together, or the same with the neutrons and protons, there is no matter-antimatter reaction.
please provide evidence next time you attempt to prove any ideas impossible.

>>1572718
negative. its not a magnet, it uses mass thousands of times greater (via artificial singularity [S]) than that of ship (A) in order to pull it and not move itself due to inertia.
then it deactivates S and the mass of A is thousands of times greater than that of S, in turn pulling S and leaving A in a stationary position relative to S, this repeats via the anti-matter activated electrical current used to create this field that essentially turns the mass of S on and off millions of times per second.

hey buddy
>>1572649

refer:
>>1572414
>>1572418
now maintain silence or intellectual contribution.

hey buddy
>>1572418

refer to this:
>>1572414
>>1572649
now maintain silence or intellectual contribution.

>>1572608
my theory in essence is creating a singularity via neutrons, also utilizing electronic charge that fluctuates millions of times a second to create and negate the mass/gravity of the singularity. the singularity when in effect will pull the craft, when negated, the "singularity" will be pulled by the craft.
it would be a perpetual chase until the "singularity" is "turned off" when desired rapidity is reached.
also when using said "singularity" one would utilize it when at a safe distance from a stellar system. once that distance is reached with subluminous travel, the drive would be activated and hyperluminous/superluminous rapidity would be achieved, therefore eliminating the issue of light catching up with the object in order for it to interact with the universe.
why?
because in subluminous travel the light would be traveling at C, as interpreted by normal space around "you"
once superluminous rapidity is reached, a singularity is activated and deactivated millions of times per second. trapping the light of the object traveling at superluminous rapidity within the effect field. the light would never be left behind.
to normal space said object would seem to pop out of existence when superluminous rapidity is achieved, and when superluminous travel is terminated and said object returns to "normal space" it would appear to pop back into existence. the light of the object travels at C relative to the object, not relative to normal space.

>>1572543
it may be necessary to create a few of the hybrid particles in a particle accelerator before utilizing the "super-mass neutron sphere" and creating electrical charges in the neutrons.

>>1572530
i am not sure, that will require more research, however it may require a particle accellerator and few of the hybrid atomic structures formed from neutron (neuclei) and antimatter for the orbiting particles (either anti-protons or anti-electrons to establish desired charge opposite of its natural matter counterparts)

i am not OP doofus
OP began posting as "flotsam" halfway through this thread at around 2300hrs last night.

hey fuckass
>>1572379

for fuck-sakes please read entire thread before posting something that has been addressed 5+ times in this thread!
>>1572384

douchefag
>>1572309
please refer to
>>1571999
>>1572020
these ideas already address the neutrons' neutral charge.
also my main idea is that the mass of neutrons would be large enough to hold its own spherical shape with its own gravitational field.
there are other theories or ideas that could go into this.
>>1572295
also why ban the threads? would you prefer to stunt intellectual thinking for something that has yet to be proven impossible. until such an occurrence, a hypothesis may remain to be researched and attempted to be either proven impossible or "proven possible"
>>1572290
also, please provide the reasoning for why it wouldnt work. I did my own short study on alcubierre drive and the problems as well as the solutions posed by other scientists. so please state why it would be so impossible as you stake to claim is the case.

my ref. for alcubierre problems and solutions:

http://news.discovery.com/space/warp-drive-spaceship-engine.html

http://physics.about.com/od/physicsatod/g/Alcubierredrive.htm

http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/A/Alcubdrive.html

also wiki link, even though source is unreliable it refers to the solutions posed by other scientists so they can be researched as well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubierre_drive


one solution was the Krasnikov Tube.
heres the wiki link.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krasnikov_Tube
im tired of posting liks to back things up so you can search things for yourselves now.

>>1571912
>>1571935
i envy you.

due to life and my experiences, i personally have developed an apathetic standpoint of existential nihilism.
there is no purpose to existence, other than to exist.
it creates a state of moderate depression within myself, something i have known my whole life.
i am glad to have my intelligence, yet at times i wish i were much less intelligent so as to allow me to be satisfied with a simple mate or simple work, even just a simple childhood, but that is something i never had and never will have.
that is my standpoint for how one is effected by intelligence and depression.

>>1572024
of course if we utilized an effect to create an Alcubierre Drive, it would completely eliminate relativity.

also what about the theoretical possibility of taking neutrons, then attaching "anti-electrons" or "anti-protons" to the neutrons.
essentially we are taking anti matter sub atomic particles and attaching it to neutrons. If this can be accomplished, we solve the issue of how to electrically charge neutrons without creating atomic structures that are viable.

>>1571984
inb4 caustic remarks
the neutron mass getting electrically charged would be powered by another, smaller electron mass. technically in my thoughts the ability to electrically charge a neutron mass would be creating a small scale form of nuclear fusion, however it would only be applying an electrical charge to a particle of mass, rather than creating atomic structures

>>1569913
because of the neutral electrical charge, as well as the high mass that can be achieved through the use of a large masses of neutrons.

>>1570538
I never thought of that, however the ability to do that could also create a power supply to energise the neutron mass.... hmm... ponder, tiem for research.

>>1569654
electronically charge the neutral particles.
then you can utilize electromagnetism to contain them.