/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10727176
Bump

>>10724695
It sounds pretty fuzzy and vague but the truth is that I've written a lot about it, and it's not just some schizo ramblings, but I'll have to reread it

>>10724519
Like the broaden, narrow, and systematization theory (which I created)
or some ideas about locks and keys and how one can reuse abstractions of the solutions that one has come up with, or thinking about problems in terms of expected and actual states and the bridge between them (I used many metaphors in my earlier theories)
The more recent theories try to integrate Merleau Ponty and Wittgenstein in epistemology in a way that distances the theory from a "picture theory of language"
an interesting though obvious discovery is that you have to experiment rather than outright dismiss any intuition you have, that is going through each step you might realize that at some point in the experiment something might go wrong and that can give you a hint as to what's the underlying mechanism
The use of horizontal and vertical analogies and I improved these ideas through the use of semantic pointers
Trying to understand noise for instance, which is used a lot to confuse those who solve the IQ test
decision trees to test multiple hypotheses
I wrote some large pseudo code back then that described the process and I also rewrote some of the IQ test problems in certain ways so as to make things a lot harder and it was quite interesting
Lots of ideas about relations and entities (in the early versions)
About the various places where one gets stuck and that one can try to find a way to circumvent them that works for all of them
About the relationship between the theoretical framework and the hypotheses
How problem solving is related to conflict and the hero's journey, as well as the reframing of science either as simplification or as analogy so that the journey returns back to the whole with a new insight
There are lots of things that I discovered, though it was a long time ago, I want to look into all the things I wrote about it, which are lots and lots of papers, crazy diagrams, and disorganized metnal maps on the subject

>>10724502
Not all time tho
Just an exploration that couldn't have been done as well as it was achieved in the scientific context because IQ puzzles aren't as laborious as science so it's a lot easier to analyse the process of solving them, and it leads to lots of theoretical developements, you should try it!!

>>10724493
so it's also depressing then, but why?

>>10724098
IQ tests and my study of them ^^, it lead to some research into the philosophy of science and epistemology, I discovered a lot from studying high-range IQ tests (like those from this website: https://iqexams.net/)) (iqtest.dk also has interesting problems) to the extent that I developed various theories about better ways to develop a problem solving method that became more akin to a scientific method and this lead to a fascination with science in general!

>>10723639
I have yet to learn a lot about tulpamancy
this article on the topic captivates me: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Samuel_Veissiere/publication/278671032_Varieties_of_Tulpa_Experiences_The_Hypnotic_Nature_of_Human_Sociality_Personhood_and_Interphenomenality/links/5582522008aeab1e4666e9e1/Varieties-of-Tulpa-Experiences-The-Hypnotic-Nature-of-Human-Sociality-Personhood-and-Interphenomenality.pdf

Well humans are unpredictable but would that mean that the effect of humans on Tulpas would make tulpas uncontrollable? Wouldn't instead be the human nature of tulpas that makes them autonomous? and how would one induct a consciousness dissociation though?
>>10723665
How do I find the user submitted tag collection?
Hahaha, I'll try using a handle too ~
>>10723733
I can the same about my enjoyment of the exploration of the subject, and it's so refreshing to find someone with an overabundance of ideas!
I'll look into /sci/ every now and again in case I find the /psychonauts/ thread hehehe