/sci/ - Science & Math

It's because for at least a few decades individuals have intended to study the sciences or Mathematics for work as in employment or fame-seeking. Sometimes they switch back and forth. I do think there are cases where a topic or field is "coded" such that the participants are generally in inclusivity. I do still find pseudo-science on Wikipedia sometimes. By induction, candidates for degrees in the Sciences or Mathematics are individuals or youths who only like the work or have a work-ethic philosophy like Christianity or clean business.

A black hole is exitable with cheap and compact materials.

Both are mental illnesses. They are deviation from biblical practice.

Hello.

>>8043802
As long as you don't run out of light according to n-light energy and a nice perfectly durable and compact aircraft or light spaceship - then yes I do think such faster than light voyage is possible. Cheaply as well. Kindly post videos or photographs. I do think such a project is quite documentable.

>>8043306
Early Transcendentals is just the friendly name of the book I think. Uniquely, those kinds of books are useful to students who want to become Engineers or Computer Scientists. According to transcendental numbers like pi or some number of i.

>>8037782
It looks like any motion is time travel according to the common idea of time travel. Distance across t? How could one be a Physicist and not logically reject an argument like a time machine.

>>8043830
I don't know what you mean by further bounds. Not all light is "light." There is, the light from a flashlight or the light from a livingroom lamp or the light from a computer pc. So I do think that by induction there can be more that one light. Light is not particularly or uniquely singularistic - it is in a case a set of projected discrete quantum units of maybe photons or electrons. In the original post No.8043802 the post is interpretable as without light. I do think that is possible as well. According to "without light" it does seem like there is no problem at all.

>>8041469
They were built by the best Mathematicians. I do think they have nice or perfect geometry.

>>8043816
There can be n-light. So there is a useful and meaningful purpose to manned space travel. It certainly is not impossible to move faster than light.

I also add, it is certainly possible cheaply. Post videos and photographs of your work. Thanks.

- Victor

>>8043036
Not equivalently so not at all.

>>8043802
There can be n-light. So there is a useful and meaningful purpose to manned space travel. It certainly is not impossible to move faster than light,

>>8043798
As an example:

Picture 1

Eternity >< Eternity (present), as x = time and y = the growth of space

>>8043600
I think I agree a little bit. I do think that "the Big Bang" is equivalent to the universe as it is. However, I don't think it is particularly singular, as in, that is from which the universe is from. I do think it is the case that there is precedent physics to the Big Bang. In other words, it could be a diploid-like item like: ><.

>>8043591
1. Did the big bang occur from a singularity or something else?

The Big Bang occurred from a singularity. The Big Bang is a singularity.

2. How does an infinitely or near infinitely hot and dense state (containing all mass in the universe) existing as a singularity actually explode?

According to that idea the explosion is in the form of a diploid - so by the accumulation of heat.

Question 3 is the same as question 2.

3. What if the big bang did not occur from a singularity?

It certainly did. Otherwise, there would not be a singular space (the space) or a locatable area. If the big bang did not occur from a singularity then the universe would be at least two-sided.

>>8039357
How is French 21st Century God Genes important? More importantly, you are not discussing it scientifically on a Science and Math forum imageboard.

It looks like you guys have not solved the problem "Two Towers and the 9/11 New York Terrorist Attack" if you haven't yet figured that although the event was important the individuals who made the event were not important according to any sharp rule.

Such lack of nobility only perpetuates more corruption and decreases the production of proof documents in Mathematics and the Sciences. Otherwise, the connectivites and real map groups are not particularly conducive to work or nice food or nice shoes.

Grigori Perelman is ugly though. If he is ugly then how could his Mathematics be right? Just because it says Geometry or "Topology"? I don't think he is even Poincaré conjecture. Perhaps he is a Muslim. He recently moved to Israel as I saw in the documentary about him.

Note 2: There is noise and magnetism manipulation at the use of this website sometimes even when the intent is clearly only Mathematics and pure logic as above. So, I do think that the connectivity and map groups are not particularly secure enough for the perpetuation of scientific investigation.

Consider that /sci/ - Science & Math is the implication "talk about science, mathematics, or geometry" here - then, why would there be an error? Or in another situation, why would there be noise? Such problems seem easily solveable when there is not any noise - however, in the event of there being noise, the noise requires 2 people to increase the production of proof documents in the Sciences and Mathematics. But if there is always going to be science, as in the interval [2, infinity+) then the science and math shows that there is at least two people in order for there to be science. So such disruptions to /sci/ - Science & Math are not actually of "science" themselves. I do think that such "of" people are not actually scientists or Mathematican. Also, another example is that a radio could be used to disrupt an individual doing Mathematics or science. Such event is not scientific itself. I do think that the tool has been used to disrupt civilization such as the areas described in the "Two Towers and the 9/11 New York Terrorist Attack."

- Victor Isai Mazariegos

The Poincare Conjecture shows that all space is either in the shape of a sphere or a flat plane. If it is the shape of a single sphere or a single flat plane then it is easily countable. Single is equivalent to 1. So if the sphere was multi-sided, the set of all circles' edges is infinity, I do think, a much bigger infinity than the set infinity of a single circle. By induction, the geometry of any problem either has one point, or many points. A point is just shows where a particular place is. Another word for point is mark. Where one places a mark is not as important as where the picture or map actually is - otherwise, there would not be any "invisible" or not easily visible items.

In summary, the consequence of The Poincare Conjecture is that any event could have a super nice number - however, any event is not particularly important, so a super nice number just depends on the context of the statement, shape, individual, population, set, location, map, connection, quality, quantity, or path on a plane.

Note: the growth of a map is usually or generally regular.

Super Nice Numbers and The Poincare Conjecture

According to the truth value 1 in relation to space, the treatment of a shape or a connection, a path, a graph, etc. - such items of any size is countable with a rational whole integer. For example, an apple is one item. There is the saying "an apple a day keeps the doctor away." In other words, a healthy food such as an apple is a good fruit for keeping my health top. The frequency of questions like "what is the best remedy or medicine for the flu?" or "what is your favorite shoe?" is answerable in Mathematics with pictures and unique numbers. For example, if a car or a plane or a helicopter is in good condition then it looks like a pleasant shape, perhaps an 8 or a 9. However, a single car, a single plane, or a single helicopter is at most only a whole "10." By induction, large or macro-scale events such as a big or fluctuating change in the graph of an economy would use a more important number. Specifically this is due to the effect of economies and civilizations having a single and unique origin, such as Christianity or the Sciences - particularly Mathematics or logic. The logic of important events like 9/11's terrorist attack in New York shows that the sequence of areas is not particularly rational or irrational when the origin is not very visible. So a nice or a super nice number is noteworthy in situations like "there is a car crash" or a "helicopter crash" in the city if the starting point of investigation of why and how the incident or coincident occurred is not easily figurable.

well the question is who is who?

i am an christian myself, but i am doubting cause of a lot of things that i am seeing around if it all is real, i am curious and plz keep this discussion logical, but who is right and who is wrong?

>>3561521

Use fill in Photoshop

I DARE YOU >:D