/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12645554
Psy ops 101: Truth and falsehood by association. Associate pro-vaccine programing with obviously true facts like the roundness of the earth. Conversely, associate vaccine skepticism with obviously false statements and flat earthers. Don't forget to mention that anyone skeptical of the lookdowns thinks corona is caused by 5G.

>>11741742
lmao

>>11229407
>Unfortunately the Christfags overtook the other ones in this case. How would we stop it from happening again?

By having a complete model of reality. JudeoChristians throughout history have exploited the holes in knowedge. For example, the reason why Athens fell is because they didnt know about disease vectors, and were completely caught by surprise from a virus outbreak at their military's high density barracks. Allowed the Spartans to easy conquer them, when the Athenians had a better strategy. The diseases made them easy Christian converts later since Christians had a definitive answer for it, "disease is from the devil" etc...

>>11229266

Yeah, which makes Christian persecution of Jews so ridiculous, and vice versa. They are just denominations of the same religion. In fact, the Bible was rewritten to make "the jews" into the bad guys just so as not to piss off the Roman elite. Everywhere in the bible talking about the evil Jews was originally talking about the evil Romans. Jesus was beloved by the Jews at the time. Its why he had so many followers. He was their king.

>>11229693

Exactly. Imagine explaining germ theory to someone 300 years ago who was completely convinced that disease was caused by the devil.

Imagine how completely insane you would sound ranting about billions of little creatures crawling on your skin, and how even the human body is made out of them, how the human body is just a hive of trillions of smaller creatures. They would actually burn you alive for talking like that.

>>11229695

the best future is below not above. We should shrink, not grow. Trillions of minds on microprocessors, and then smaller still until we reach the quantum realm. We should be tethering ourself into DEPTH not scope.

The other take away is that whatever we find in those depths will have a headstart and could be ridiculously advanced due to the time accelleration effect... so maybe not...

.. on the other hand there will be less... in fact perhaps zero, competion expanding into galactic scope since larger scales will be less advanced than us, in theory

Its a trade off, so who the fuck knows.

I will say that simply realizing this effect exists, the time acceleration effect, so much more of existance makes sense. The effect holds true even at relatively macrolevels. Whales can live to be over 200 years old, us 100, dogs 30, flies live for a week, bacteria live for a day. Its literally because physics is tied to scale. And scale is tied to time.

>>11229698
>Putting a massive body near an atomic "arm" is going to attract all the subatomic particles into a ball

Imagine if a giant the size of the observable Universe stuck an instrument needle bigger than a galaxy near a galactic arm, all the stars and planets would attract to it through gravitational forces and it would destroy the entire galactic system.

>>11229669

Putting a massive body near an atomic "arm" is going to attract all the subatomic particles into a ball through

>>11229649

Its true. Its been computationally modelled. Universe is like a fractal. As above, so below.

>>11229637
>except galactic arms arent superpositions that can suddenly be expressed as a single particle when observed, or anything analogous to that.

Uncertainty principle is an artifact of hidden information.

>>11229645

So do atoms.

Galaxy plume

This is all Optimum Theory, fyi.

I'm not Gary. Like I said, I'm Larry. But this is all from the theory.

>>11229624

It you were to scale up that housefly to our size, it would be zipping about at hundreds of miles per hour, but its small, and so even though the fly is remarkably quick, its not covering much ground relative to our scale of reality.

>>11229610

Its like comparing a human to a housefly.

A human can outrun a housefly, so a human is FASTER, but a housefly is QUICKER and difficult to swat.

Even though the spin of subatomic particles is faster than light, it would not beat light in a "race" the spin is simply occuring at a MUCH smaller scale that experiences an accelerated time comparable to our scale.

The reason why atoms have 2 electrons in the first orbital is because those are the 2 connecting spiral arms. Other orbitals are simply measuring how many times the instrument detects a passing arm during a rotation.

>>11229591

Absolutely BTFO

Jesus what a killshot

>>11229579

Completely true. Subatomic particles have measured spin as high as a million times faster than light. Physicists hand wave it away as a flaw in their measuring instruments. Its not.

Time literally accellerates the deeper you go because time is simply a measurement of movement through space, and the opposite is also true, larger scales are moving slower through time.

>>11229473

I don't know about that... but I do suspect that it is impossible to be nonexistant. We are in a loop.

>>11229477

No. I'm sober.

But I'm free.

>>11229481

Why do these thoughts make you so angry?

I know why. But do you?

>>11229476

Im OP and this is 100% accurate. We can even computationally simulate it, and we have.

The spiral arms are equivalent to electron shells. Literally the same thing at different scales of reality.