/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6454542

>>6454537

>>6454534
2D to 3D Mandelbrot set

>>6454530

>>6454522
>>6454523
Thanks, you should try making a few yourself. I find it quite fun

>>6454518

>>6454511
7

>>6454509
>>6454508
Haha, try pairing with psychedelics, if you are in to that sort of thing.

>>6454507
5

>>6454499
>>6454500
Mandelbulb 3D, A very interesting piece of freeware if you want to check it out.

>>6454487
3

>>6454483
2

I had been dumping these in /b/, but someone suggested I bring them here. Here are some fractal objects I have created.

>There is no question that the further away a galaxy the faster it recedes from us (as described in Hubble's law), but why do people explain this observation by saying that space itself stretches or is created between galaxies?
The only way an object can move faster is A) if it is imparted energy or 2) the space on which it exists is expanding outwards. There is no observed or theoretical phenomenon to explain the increase in rate other than dark energy or the cosmological constant being involved in an acceleration of matter apart.

>Especially when space is not some substance independently defined from the distance measurements we make
Yes it is, though it gets modified from Relativistic theories to be more confounded by the relative velocities of travelling objects and the mass/energy they have.
>so saying that space is created between is the same as saying that the distance between the two galaxies increases, it does not explain anything
It explains why things are further apart than they should be given any other known properties of matter-light.

>If galaxies recede from a given point at a rate proportional to their distance away from it, then from any point it will appear that galaxies recede at a rate proportional to their distance as well.
Again, there is no theoretical or observational effect to explain this phenomenon other than space having an existence and it is expanding and dark energy accelerates mass in terms of Special Relativity.

>There is no need to invoke that weird-ass concept of space expanding, stretching or being created, all we have to say is that galaxies keep on going due to inertia with the speed the big bang imparted them (slowing down due to gravity and accelerating due to dark energy).
Then propose a mathematically accurate explanation of the phenomenon which also can accurately describe the orbits of planets, microwave background radiation, quantities of observable mass and energy, the spectrum of lights, etc, and I will gladly follow

>>6422568
have fun using my methods faggot
>>6422570
faggotry is the ultimate pleasure of being a human
>>6422573
Ad hominem attack

>>6320529
but the patient has a scalpel inside his penis

>>6320509
yup. always cup the balls

>>6320501
ok good. i was kinda worried that i would lose my medical license, i think i forgot to take out the scalpel out of the patient before stitching him up. anyway i just wanted to know what my options were. thanks x

quick question
if a doctor loses their medical license in the uk can they still teach at a uni?

MEDFAGS GET IN HERE
medfag thread v2

ok so the last thread is gone, thought we should have a medfag v2 thread.
MEDFAGS ONLY
itt: we discuss how shit other degrees other

>>6305807
people like you are scum. no better than fucking amish people; rejecting science. fucking cunt

>>6305802
thank you, that is very considerate of you xx

>>6217109
thanks, 3:50am atm and i have a 9am start tomorrow so i'll give it a read tomorrow.

thanks though

>>6217074
oh cool where do you study?
and sorry i don't have a picture, but now i think they are motor neurons