/sci/ - Science & Math

all the options are self directed, and shit to start with
except for the last one, which is shit because you die

but out of all honesty, id take the PHD and become a wizard

>"my IQ is average+"
>causes miniature faecal deluges

My IQ is 130.

>>3423558
Oh, you.

Aren't optical implants for military use already being worked on?

>>3373020
DING!
yes, explain

ITT: trolled people

yes.

>mfw religion

>>3292594
God damn it, that voice.

>>3289013
>frauds and scams in my country
Man, where do you live?

>>3288930
>Amazon and E-bay doesn't make deliveries in my country.
Assuming you can't get a download, just use a mail forwarding service for problems like that.

>physics

Majority of people think I'm doing god-tier work and somehow know the answer to everything whether it's related or not. Nope.

>>3248057
He has a point OP

>pic related.jpg

laymen here
i know gravity and mass are correlated. the more mass something has the grater it's gravity. i also know that as an object reaches relativistic speeds it's inherent "mass" also increases, at least in theory.

so, for a while, i thought if you moved something fast enough it would exert greater gravity than it would while at rest. i did some quick reading and, as i understand it, the "mass" gained from speed is only inherit to the object itself. all outside measurements would show that the object's original mass and gravity no matter its speed (below c?).

do i understand this correctly or does change in speed actually affect gravity?

>>3062987
>dark matter

>>3062979
>Nuclear is to dangerous

>implying why as a question always makes sense

it upsets me when people ask why when they mean how.

>>2954186
the copernican principle, there is no reason to image the homogeneity of the universe stops at the edge of the observable universe.
>>2954200
You have two choices, moron or troll. Pick whichever.
>>2954060
"Almost surely" is more accurate, as to whether life exists outside earth. There's a non-zero chance it doesn't.
>>2953995
> What's outside of the universe?

Question does not make sense, universe is defined as everything that exists.

>At first it was nothing...but what was around it?

Inflation cosmology says nothing about "nothing", it just goes back to a time where the universe was much denser. Contextualize your question.

>Then what is around it today?

Why would there be something around the universe that is not the universe?

>Does that make your head hurt?

No.

if the universe is infinite the answer is "almost surely."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_surely


as >>2953844 said, we don't know if the universe is infinite or not. with the flatness of space, it's just pretty much assumed.

Has anyone read this article before:

http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2010/09/24/3020197.htm

"Albert Einstein's theory of relativity shows that gravity and veolicty impact on time."

An interesting read..

>>2770819

Have you considered diamond instead of copper?

Px0.9

I do, but I got bored with them. Too much of a hassle and always the same routine of flirting fucking and dumping.