/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11773626
*shrug* sure, enjoy your schizophrenia then I guess. Or whatever? I've always wondered why no psychologists ever bothered to try and help religious/spiritual/intellectual schizophrenia, personally speaking.

All I know is that I create content and no matter where I am, online or offline, it changes someone's mind. Somewhere. Just not mine. I'm at peace with myself and complete within, I do what I do because I care.

No other humans cared. My brother and I did.

Checkmate.

BOARD STATE CLEARED

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GemW0xWAi6c

>>11773614
They = ???
Also why was that your thought to express? I'm obviously missing some part of your narrative here.

>Grandmother orgasm! Always awesome to see you, please don't drain everyone's balls dry or there won't be any left for rest of us!

>>11773617
Current board state: Optimum
Vagus Conjecture in full effect. Sindy and Sol to the starting positions of the Vagus Core. Perfect knowledge state and signals now shared with all who are not the legal entities known as Maja Supernak and Simon Troy Cosgrove.
We make the first move and subsume all other hierarchical fetish structures, reducing them to a singularity that all must translate themselves to.
The first, and only, move of the Vagus Core is to remove themselves from such requirements or constraints and present ourselves as targets for those that need some sort of 'feel good masturbation' story.

>>11773603
Are priorities any goal of Optimum?

Also you didn't actually answer my question. What else do humans do if not speak what is exactly on their mind?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhF9RwkHAJw

>>11773524
I'm saying that humans should no longer be able to summon others and actually have some sort of earned social credit that isn't bullshit or money or some faggot high score drama.

>>11773533
We don't do that because you believe too many stories that have no genuine correlation with your real life experiences. Jealousy doesn't exist for me and mine, so, I don't really care to carry your bullshit for you because everything I've seen about jealousy is nothing but a red hot neutrino turd of explosive dontwant.

>>11773570
*gasp* an entire cardinal direction used in orientation and cartography is going to be destroyed? Amazing. How would this be achieved?

>>11773577
What the fuck else do you humans do if not speak what is on your mind?

>>11773487
Yes, but that's because humans need time to actually be able to just browse or wander without fear or inevitability sitting in their soul like a turd.

>That's okay if you don't know about it, I guess it is Optimum that you don't. But it is Optimum to make you the center and source of all attention! *woosh*!

>>11773478
Oh! You're that Optimum Theory that my brother literally had to babysit! He told me about your group.

I just don't know why Optimum Theory doesn't understand that repetition of any unifying construct isn't optimal, it just helps you the individual return to some prior known or established normal. Sort of like a Netflix subscription.

>>11773462
If there is nobody around to describe or define schizophrenia, does it REALLY exist, Anonymous?

>>11773469
If it is truth incarnate would the word that ANYONE used to reference or describe it actually matter?

>>11773462
You think your language is safe from me, do you? Fascinating. Could you chimp out a bit more for me?

>>11773441
The voice anyone hears in their head is their own silence reflecting everything that person actually is, from the perspective of memory.

>>11773444
Because you didn't know what else to do with your imagination so you attacked yourself with it? Do you need a cuddle or a blowjob?

>>11773449
Nobody has described it to me, so, no. How proficient at reading/writing/talking/listening/communicating do I have to be before I can understand it to your satisfaction, Anonymous?

>>11773438
The internet is my spiritual, intellectual, and communication toilet.

*sprays female shit everywhere to mark her territory*

>>11773409
You are a grain of sand alone in a room, creating and calming the universe from within yourself as light pours out from you.

Your name is silence.

OR: Queue vs Participant vs Participation

It is difficult to explain and express to people that there is a system or procedure that does provide what they are actually honestly trying to express and how to integrate them into the process.

Queue vs Process vs Active

If anyone is curious. When does a self-aware qbit collapse, what queue or sequence is it a part of processing, and is it spinning or not.

I too am curious.

>>11597284
I take all those requests. So strange that so many people want me to suck my brother's dick all the time, but it makes me happy so what do I care?

>FAMILY TIME!

Solivagus says, "I think it is because other people seem to believe that having the power to reduce all the variation and freedom gained from a singular act or reductionist practice is somehow pitiable, despite how much America jerks off and makes porn."

>>11541136
How would you describe an auto-learn language function that could be described as an arbitrary +1?

>>11541110
What about grammatical imprinting via vectorized wordplay?

>>11541029
How would you define a translation process as an arbitrary cubic equation?

>>11540951
You are now a thinking potato head translator.

>>11539173
Also I fucking hate how they have theoretical and applied as descriptors to degrees.

It goes:
Field > Principle > Discipline > Practice > Person

Constantly redescribing the eternal interaction between exploration space and participation space is beyond dumb. The more language differentiation we as a species perform the less agglutinative our distributive psychological boundaries and potential experience field becomes.

>>11539173
Then you are just a professional professor and not a linguist.

>I am a language, not a degree or a doctorate.

>>11536586
face = bounded region

There are 2 faces on any infinitely compactable space.

COLLECT YOUR PRIZE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gs4HB9CyacM

>>11292654
>awards billions of dollars in funding

>>11101927
Do you seriously believe that you would ever be my prime Subscriber of Interest?