/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2693531
I swear, Encyclopedia Dramatica is more consistent than Conservapedia

>>2693528
Cannot stop laughing.

Oh god. Look on the liberal page. Halfway down, Godwin's Law goes into effect.

YOU KNOW WHO ELSE IS A LIBERAL? HITLER! More or less.

On top of that, right off the bat, FAMOUS LIBERALS: JOHN WAYNE GACEY

Really, how polar can a Wiki get? Also: People who can edit are the 'best of the people'.

Since I'm betting the conservatives barely understand half of what is spewed on the website, you think it's possible to switch the page names around if we had editing rights?

>>1294384
Well, if by 'science related' you mean 'stuff that's going to tell him God is fake and everything is science', then yes, you are being a douchebag. Otherwise, if he's just an avid reader or maybe just likes studying things like that, go ahead. Hope he enjoys it.

>>1294363
I don't understand what's wrong with rounding a large number like that. What was the number being used for that he would need sig figs or otherwise?

Meta-trolling?

No.

MEGA-TROLLING!

Hey /sci/, I have a trollTASTIC theory for you!

/sci/ is full of trolls. Thus, something must have created these trolls. I propose that on the seventh day, God created trolls. Throughout history, they went around being douchebags and fucking things up. Moses got trolled, Jesus got trolled, Saul and Abraham were trolled. So everyone on /sci/ should realize that trolling is a natural reflex of humanity throughout history.

Also: This is a troll thread.

>>1293492
>implying /sci/ isn't made up of a majority of trolls, who, statistically, are fucking up this thread.

>>1093127
You also forgot to realize that you were about to queen a pawn. That position is basically hopeless.

>>1092842
Oh, I'm a thinker, heh. It's why I don't like timed games.

>>1092817
I thought out each and every one of these moves. I don't use an engine.

>>1092765
An engine? What do you mean?

Let's get it on!

http://chess.diem-project.org/?g=wu85pcdn

>>1043514
Then why not encourage mods to manage multiple boards? I'm really going out on a limb here.

>>1043503
But, why not, then? How does the program for this forum work? Can you assign a mod to only have power on a single board (but still have the power to ban across multiple boards)?

I propose to /sci/ a hypothesis, starting with an explanation.

From what I understand, some of the boards on 4chan have mods, and most of the time no one knows who those mods are (unless they feel like making themselves known).

Often, I am not sure whether a board has mods or not, especially when troll threads are on the first page and remain there consistently.

I hypothesize that if a mod was assigned to a board and that board informed 4chan users of the presence of a mod on the board (not whether they are online or not, only that one exists), trolls and troll threads would be deterred, or in the very least deleted by the mod before they could become problems.

>>1042946
This is really interesting. However, what should we conclude from this? That fruit/vegetable shapes should give us an idea of what body part they improve?

Are there any counterexamples to this?

>>1043260
>Do my homework for me /sci/ ROFL
sage, again. Really, don't you even READ your section? Ask your teacher? Ask your peers?

>>1043148
>Implying the SAT is an accurate measure of intellectual capacity and/or IQ
>implying you know what a shit university is
Holy shit, go to hell, OP. Sage.

2 minutes. Then I raged. 'Hurr, howsacome I can't find the word 'Dinosaur' in the Bible?'