/sci/ - Science & Math

I am a colossal faggot who doesn't know what he's talking about. Please disregard the entirety of this thread, especially my previous posts. Thank you.

>>11305546

You are such a boring boy. Gotta learn some Owner of Physics doctrine. Well I can't blame you for not having access to my education.

I developed myself one thousand years of Math and Physics who do you think that you are? curve and obey. Bye

hopefully the universe would stop to expand when it finds another universe to stick to... but who knows the consequences

>>11305505

A nobleman like me shouldn't be talking with a dirty trash like you who doesn't argue but only insults

you should watch more Japanese anime

and other "universes" in case we adopt groups of galaxies and the concept of "universe" which is not appropriate

Actually it's not the universe that is expanding, this is a mistake of mine. It's the group of galaxies that most of scientists consider "the universe" is expanding. The correct idea is that the universe includes vacuum.

why do you think that the universe is expanding you idiot? just cry more

The particle spins fastly, is trying to fly out, but is sticked to another thanks to the meeting of two spinnings. However, the force of releasing it is stronger in vacuum I'm pretty sure.

>>11305470

No arguments so just cry.

>>11305470

You are just a normal person, please do not mess up with the Owner.

would be free to expansion*

I should write a book and make you read it by force.

I have two laws that I developed myself:

- elementary particles (which are energy particles) do not expand in vacuum;
- non-elementary particles expand in vacuum;

Particles expand in vacuum because of it's spin, the spin makes a particle fly out, particles by principle are always trying to expand, it need more and more space.

Release a rock in total vacuum and it would be destroyed.

What sticks a particle to another is spin too, but on a manner that I don't wanna explain, I have lessons about this here.

However, the effect of being together do not resist vacuum, because part of the particle would not be sticked to the other and free to expansion.

This expansion does not cause an opposite force, the particles just separate.

>>11305344

So tell me how the expansion of gases in vacuum works. Mr. PhD in Physics.

>Hurr durr I'm a huge faggot please rape my face

However I don't know how the ISS works, if they are able to land or not. Bye

well it could make a differente because the ISS is close to Earth and the speed would be accelerated by Earth's gravity. Who knows,

if the guys from the ISS are reading this they could suggest this system, however the safity of keeping this gas there should be analysed and I don't know how much gas would be enough to make a strong force to push the ISS to Earth.

acquired

and this counterforce could be adquired using a more complex system then just releasing the gas without the propper care

I would say that the expansion of gas in space would make a small counterfoce to the object and it would start a practical constant movement, this could at least send a drone or smallspaceship into a direction. that's it.

Man forget this rocket discussion it's the opposition of forces that make the movement and that's it. Pressure has little to do with it. The idea of using pressure as a way to move things is possible but it still would be a finite source of energy since the gas would run out. And it's a weak force in our space environment. In vacuum it would be another discussion. Space is too fullfilled. You would need a more empty environment to make this practical. And the object that would be moved would be very light and the system to use the expansion of the gas would be more complex.

Maybe very compressed gases could make a difference. But why use the expansion of the gas caused by pressure to move a rocket instead of exploding the gas?

In theory, yes, gases could be used to move objects even without burning it. However, very little use. It could save someone one time when you are lost in space without energy to burn the gas.