/sci/ - Science & Math

I would develop this ideais more to understand that viruses are really taking from cells besides protein which is very clear that its body is made of protein

ok so keep believing that viruses want our cells not because of food and that they do not take energy from anything

the lesson is clear

so protein is not a good idea

I'm certain that you can produce muscles without a diet rich in protein but that requires a longer time.

I would try to avoid eating protein and gain antibodies at the same time.

I think that a no-protein diet could avoid the introduction of protein in your body and estimulate the production of antibodies since these protective proteins are produced by our body.

I don't think that viruses produce proteins so fastly... they likely take it from our cells.

So that's what I have for now.

>>11344759

Good for the guys who are sick.

>>11344718

Elementary, my dear Watson.

maybe a diet with less protein could help a bit while you threat it... the virus would multiply less

you can lack of protein it's true but maybe doctors could find a way to keep you alive with other food until the virus is being attacked

that it doesn't eat*

so where the protein of the new viruses come from?

so the virus is made of protein and you think that it doesn't it your protein?

why do you die after getting infected? does it eat your protein?

you need to know that I decide things here Academy is mine

may I own Biology too? I make fun of these books

>>11344692

not according to me

>>11344689

sorry nigga you to understand that every living being eats to take some energy

protein and glucose maybe?

just wondering if it's protein that it eats, is it?

protein?

what is the interest of coronavirus in our cells? what the part of the cell that is "eaten"?

something that the virus would try to eat but die

or a chemical like acts like acid for it but doesn't harm your cells

any poison?

is there any chemical reaction that destroys it and doesn't affect our body? what's its weakness?

Good question is about who created the laws of natural Physics. If it was God of actually even God was under this law. In case it was God, let's say that there were no rules of Physics but he was there in a even more chaotic universe.

>>11341499

It can't, it's explained by Math. He is eternal. As someone above said, 0 doesn't exist in nature, things always transform into another thing. So there wasn't a start for everything in case we include God, who is eternal. This is pure Marth.