/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4515589
I meant to quote this.

>>4515559
Think of it this way, if my /n/ squad beat /gif/ 4-1, then lost 3-0 the next time with both teams using the exact same tactics and formations, it pretty much proves that there's absolutely no guarantee that your counter is going to work.

Also, These suggestions are for after the cup, for fall (as honestly, I don't really expect you to beat /gif/, but anything could happen..), do what you like until you're out of the tournament, that doesn't affect me, I just want to help better you for the next cup, although, should you beat /gif/, good luck facing /n/..

>>4515495
The best thing to do is build your formation around your G/S/B. If you've got gold and silver up front like /sci/ do, you're best going with a big defense and a midfield that compliments them.

If anybody here can give me a very quick list of all 23 players, their positions, your current formation and skillcards, that would be very useful. Despite all of this drama (which I'm being accused of for reasons beyond me..), I can't actually tell what /sci/ are using

>>4515442
Whatever you want, I don't mind. As long as you guys don't start babbling shit like "HE'S TRYING TO CONTROL THE BOARD!!"

>>4515126
>>4515122
>>4515077
>>4512730
Always on the tip of the tongues of others.. I haven't even done non /n/ or /vp/ teams since early February.

.. but at least I stopped editing /sci/ when I was (un)politely asked to.. Anyway, unlike what you guys say, I do frequent /sci/, I usually anon but namefag when needed

Anyway, provided it's okay with the board.. (ha, like the board gets the final say in anything here anyway..), I can do test games for /sci/ and let you see how the games go and see if you guys want to rework any formations or tactics etc. I'm not going to force myself on, just politely asking if you'd like somebody with PES to actually help you guys out with tactics and not useless aesthetics which /sci/s page mostly is at this stage.

May I ask how I've managed to get involved in all of this?

HEY GUYS I'VE ARRIVED TO DERAIL EVERYTHING

>>4454985
I did choose the 5-1-4, I don't deny that. Call it idiotic, but /fit/ played 5-0-5 in winter friendlies and dominated. I tried to go for something similar. Besides, losing 1-0 to a good team like /jp/ isn't something to be ashamed of

>>4454956
Firstly, there was a thread to decide that stuff. Secondly, I only did skillcards and formations which were suggested on said thread. Everything else e.g players, g/s/b, positions, logo, anthems was decided by /s/ themselves

>>4454855
Also, I said I COULD disguise as anonymous, and on the boards, not the wiki. I only edit via my Dragonfag account.

>>4454855
You may think that those IPs are mine, but they aren't. Unlike those guys, I haven't put
1. anthem suggestions on 16 pages
2. tried to change /co/ /ck/ and so on

it is board against board. /cgl/ chose all of /cgl/s stuff (they changed my stuff, and did shit, go figure), /sci/ chose all of /sci/s stuff, (they changed my stuff, and did shit, go figure). As for /vp/ /lit/ /n/ and /3/, I use those boards a lot (as with /x/ and /sci/) and know enough about them to be able to help them. Besides, I very rarely have tried to put players in. I just do tactical work (of which /cgl/ and /sci/ failed horribly after removing)

>>4454763
2.25.213.x is kay (anthems guy, claims to use every board)
90.192.175.x is Angelo (from /pol/ /co/ ck/ /x/ and /sci/)

>>4454680
Let's look at this shall we?
LionFV made the changes before the /d/ game which we lost 1-0
I made the changes before the /vp/ game which we won 4-1
2.25.213.x and 90.192.175. made the changes before the /x/ game which we lost 3-0. I didn't make any sort of tactical change before that game. Those two changed the g/s/b, skillcards, added/removed new players.. seriously, check the page history, I didn't do anything that affected our play between those two games

But of course, you guys "don't believe my lies", despite being shown clearly on the history page..

>>4454652
It's hardly sabotage when you're not the one who changed the team between /vp/ and /x/ games.

>>4454531
you know that I'm not the one who changed the team between the /vp/ and /x/ games.. right? You do know that, don't you? Revert my edits and you'll just get what you had that lost to /d/. You can do that if you want. No g/s/b, skillcards and default formation is cool.

>>4454514
be my guest, I wont be here to help /sci/ anyway. I agree, mods, let's ban everyone ITT.

>>4454499
It appears that the "intellectuals" of /sci/ don't know what mad means.

>>4454486
I use /sci/ semi-daily or so.

>>4454463
Oh, I'll continue using /sci/ like I did before. Hell, you'll probably never even know if I were to post ITT as anonymous. Nothing you can really do.

>>4454425
Okay, I'll leave. It's not like I want to be associated with a team that's beyond hope anyway. I'm glad I started the /x/ thread where they made the changes that beat you anyway. Have a nice day, enjoy your future defeats.

I'm glad we're making changes to the team after this game. This is painful

20 minutes until /3/ vs /sp/
1 hour until /x/ vs /sci/

>>4452586
Anyway, I'm gonna head off now aswell, Plato, get back to us with the results of the g/s/b formation tests and I'll put the better one on the wiki after tomorrows game, along with the new goalhorn, moving 4 minutes to anthem, new player changes etc.

>>4452572
http://4chancup.wikidot.com/sci
36 boards competing in a PES tournament controlled by AI. /sci/ are playing /x/ tomorrow in a friendly game, and we're also preparing for our tournament debut on the 26th

>>4452569
The latter looks quite nice. We don't want to be a bright baby blue like the likes of /cm/ and /y/.