/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14751692
Fuck you. You are poisoning the well. Me jerking off to your verbal abuse does not validate COAM. Disgusting character assassination.

>>14726013
Hey, faggot.
Anonymous, do fucking know what that means?
You post like John, defend John ,etc then dont get pissy when you are mistaken for John. You damn dipshit.

>>14725842
Well, stop posting like the op and you wont be confused for the OP, asshole.

I'm trans btw

>>14725744
Some people check their references before posting...

>>14725717
But, i didnt post a reply to the OP when i called out context.
That is called evasion, John.

>>14725682
12000 doesnt falsify COAM.
Using the wrong equations however will give you the wrong result.
This is physics 101 shit, dipshit.

>>14725686
You replied to the wrong post.

>>14725660
Context

Online or bound, look up the definition.

>>14725601
I've not once impersonated you. Are you actively trying to get banned?

>>14725599
But see, I've already directly addressed the paper. Your reply was to evade and throw up a smoke screen.

>>14725588
You are harrassing the board.

>>14725572
Redskins? The fuck, autocorrect.
That should be example.

>>14725557
There is nothing wrong with his reference if it actually matched his redskins.
He is just trying to use entry level lessons, like a baby learning to crawl, on a more complex system, learning to jump hurdles.
He is incapable of walking.

>>14725534
Can you live stream your life good tick tock channel set up or something? The prospect of the look of horror on your face when you finally get what everybody's been telling you that would drive so many subscriptions and views that your payday would make bezos and musk look like chump change.

>>14725528
How is asking you to back up your own claims considered mocking?

>>14725525
Since you acknowledge my claim to have addressed your paper you must except the conclusion that your paper has been objectively falsified.

>>14725506
Post a picture of the example from the textbook.

>>14725502
See there you go again line I have not invaded your paper I have addressed your paper you on the other hand chose to invade in your responses those are frh0yxmacts that can be checked in the archive.

>>14725496
Post the entire chapter not just the equations.
Anything less is evasion. Anything less than you have to accept the fact that you misinterpreted the chapter thus you have to accept the conclusion that your paper is false.

>>14725491
Why? Your proof doesn't match your example.

>>14725488
Nope, evasion is not defeating.

>>14725484
Except it doesn't, not in the world your chosen equations describe.

>>14725481
Nope, i have not on e said existing physics is wrong.
You are now blatantly lying.