/sci/ - Science & Math

Well, do you know the formula for a 3x3 determinant?

:(

Alright, what the fuck is going on with all the pictures, /sci/?

bump after one minute

2/10

>Going to heaven when I die.

Prove it.

Sure is TROLLOLOLOL in here.

It sits there, slowly giving off Hawking radiation, until it disappears.

>>/p/

>>1460641

>>1460547

> Assume capitalism is the only option, make post.

>>1460439

Ah, thanks.

>>1460433

I think the "it" he's referring to is the condition of the environment in general. (And fixing "it" implies a fix of global climate change.)

>>1460422

It requires effort, and some people (read: republicans) are greedy and don't like to help out unless they get something from it.

(Hint: they don't understand anything besides instant pay-off.)

>>1460333

> Implying IQ is the only way to measure intelligence or
> Implying IQ is the best way to measure intelligence.
> Implying IQ tests are accurate.
> Implying your unsupported definition of 'useful' is "correct".
> Implying people have to be "useful" to live.
> Implying your inherently subjective views are objectively correct.

>>1459647

Glenn Beck, is that you?

>>1458463

Fuck me, chance*.

OP needs to learn to separate theory and it's implications from practice.

In practice, you'll fucking die before you get a change to breathe. What you mean to say "IN THEORY IF YOU DIDN'T DIE FROM HEAT, you could breathe it in and drown."

Learn to state your fucking premises.

>>1455325

trap success

>>1455248

I was waiting for this fail.

If you are a PI, then you call other people PI's.
You call someone a PI.
You are a PI.

Classic logic fail. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_the_consequent

>>1455232

Rage much. I didn't ask for a proof, I asked for an argument. Yet nobody seems to give one, they just repeat the claim and call names.

Not that hard, really. Why do you tihnk what is true is true? Have you no reason? Then why do you believe it? Why make a claim then refuse to give an argument for it?

>>1455213

Pick up a god damn book, like something from Quine. "I don't get it...pseudo-intellectual!"

Pro-tip: Pseudo-intellects call other people pseudo-intellects.

>>1455191

Can you answer my question? Or just shout names until you get your way?

>>1455166

All you've done is change the symbol 5 (or whatever) into a string of symbols. That doesn't change anything.

Arithmetic follows logically from axioms, and a rule (or rules) of deduction. Those were invented by humans.