/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2450229
i hope you burn in hell

>Watching Syfy earlier
>see a t-rex skeleton with wings trying to eat people
>...wat?

well I'm assuming you'd make this in earths atmosphere?
there'd be too many factors to give an answer in the amount of time this thread would 404

you're a pretentious faggot, who cares too much what others think and lack any real self esteem, you're "self confidence" is usally gathered from others meaning in reality it isn't SELF confidence but an esteem based on what others think.

>>2395034
no one else notice that that's not a Fibonacci spiral?

>>2155619
No no no, the New Orleans mafia was in on the whole thing

>>2155543
It was rounded to oblivion, I'm afraid.

Terrible... just terrible way to go. Poor 1%

>>2155506
death in that sense is a metaphorical death. A star does not die in the way you and I die. Death to us is a permanent loss of consciousness. A star has no consciousness to begin with, and is thus completely indifferent to it's destruction.

>>2155313
You gave a lot of information there, and while I see the purpose of the first half, I just can't understand how psychogenesis applies here.

ANON WAIT! You are a result of globalization. Yes, Anonymous IS and ALWAYS has been globalized.

It's the relatively new ability to communicate around the world in the blink of an eye, a feat only achieved just before the 21st century, it's this ability that has created social and corporate globalization. It is inevitable.
My guess is that the next generations will see the world create nearly one world-wide culture. It will no longer be an "american" culture or a "british" culture" or a "european" culture: it will be an Earth culture. Of course this excludes those nations too poor to log online

The alternative would be rather than rejecting those calculated to be less fit to survive, the AI would support them and 'fill in the gaps' so as to secure any 'weak links.' This meager attempt at tolerance and justice leaves open the possibility for the AI to assume too much control over a person's life. It could attempt to create a stronger chain, so to speak, by deeming many links weak and implementing itself in replacement.

I have assumed from the beginning of this post that this AI is benevolent and has the best interests for each individual, the environment-- it would manage entire ecologies-- as well as the best interest for all of mankind.


I've had fun writing this. I hope you had fun reading it.

Technocracy: Government run by technology
Cyberocracy: government run by multiple collaborating computers.

sounds like iRobot to me, but nonetheless, this is how I think society would work:

At birth an infant is scanned for physical and genetic properties. The AI computer saves this data for later use. At age 10 the scans are repeated. The AI add a psychological and psychoneural scan at this age to check for what the child is best/worst at and what he enjoys/hates and the like between. Using this information the AI guides his education to a particular vocation in which he will both succeed and enjoy or
Scans are repeated as often as feasible throughout one's lifetime, and vocational adjustments made when appropriate.
By ensuring that all people are satisfied in their daily work, the AI will successfully engender a contented feeling, preventing any feelings of unrest against its unchecked power.

By using genetic information about medical dispositions, the AI can track and manage a person's diet and health. It could notify and usher you to a doctor when necessary, and even provide first aid or treat simple ails and illnesses.

I'm assuming that by 'scientific' you mean a society in which the social rules are governed by scientific principles such as natural selection and survival of the fittest. I fear and oppose any society based on survival of the fittest, which when applied in the social sphere of intelligent beings, reeks prejudice, xenophobia, and social egotism.

>>2131940
That.
Is.

AWSOME.

>>2131772
what are some good companies?

>>2131603
about $50,000 at the moment

>>2131577
>engineer
I said SCIENCE

lrn2read

>>2131555
I'm talking about private capital

What are some good ways to invest in scientific research.

16+sqrt(40)?

>>2031496
post some vidence then i want to see it

>>2031311
just becasue a 2000yo book said an imaterial diety created everything on command doesnt mean shit

and plus the book is 2000 years old; how many times has it been edited? lastweek some christfags gave us some pocketsized bible made in masproduction ink text tahoma print???
you made chrisianity with science?!?!
and yea <_>

>>2030872
an ant said your a faggot
where is your god now
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wV_REEdvxo

C = \int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^\frac{-x^2}{b^2}\, dx

C = \int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^\frac{-y^2}{b^2}\, dy

C^2 = \int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^\frac{-x^2}{b^2}\, dx\, \int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^\frac{-y^2}{b^2}\, dy

C^2 = \int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^\frac{-(x^2+y^2)}{b^2}\, dx\, dy

x^2 + y^2 = r^2

\int\limits_{0}^{\pi}\int\limits_{0}^{\infty} e^\frac{-r^2}{b}r\, dr\, d\theta

C^2 =(2\pi)(\frac{b^2}{2})

C = b\sqrt{\pi}

copied cum

man, it's like it's 2000 again.