/sci/ - Science & Math

720p

bump

>>2493057
this

I promise to broadcast more reliable documentary`s later on, maybe even lectures on qm and a.i.

just choosed to stream this because of the ufologist meme pic related

Behold, Your newest streaming service...

http://www.livestream.com/tautoulogic

Gonne stream Anceint Aliens right now ! !

Aleins are responsible for the tumoil in Egypt.

Here is some emperical evidence...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGwy4tEJ6VQ

Niggers please, don`t tell me you don`t believe in warp drive technology.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warp_drive_(Star_Trek)

>>2492226
I can`t deny that video is verry entertaining...
visually.

>>2492144
srry for deleting my posts 5 times before i got it right i suck at greentexting and spelling.

>>2491922

>This allowed a "delayed choice" of the observer, i.e. a choice made after the presumed photon would have cleared the midstream barrier containing two parallel slits.
>According to the results of the double slit experiment, if experimenters do something to learn which slit the photon goes through, they change the outcome of the experiment and the behavior of the photon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheeler%27s_delayed_choice_experiment

>"Our realization of Wheeler’s delayed choice GedankenExperiment demonstrates beyond any doubt that the behavior of the photon in the interferometer depends on the choice of the observable which is measured, even when that choice is made at a position and a time such that it is separated from the entrance of the photon"
>"We, now, by moving the mirror in or out have an unavoidable effect on what we have a right to say about the already past history of that photon"
http://www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-174876.html

http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0610241

ps. i really don`t care if you think me and these scientists are not skeptical enough. If you want to rely on solipsism, fine.
I only tried to point out here these claims like "it`s just because of the interactions" are easy said, but not so based statements.

>>2491922

>This allowed a "delayed choice" of the observer, i.e. a choice made after the presumed photon would have cleared the midstream barrier containing two parallel slits.
>According to the results of the double slit experiment, if experimenters do something to learn which slit the photon goes through, they change the outcome of the experiment and the behavior of the photon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheeler%27s_delayed_choice_experiment

>"Our realization of Wheeler’s delayed choice GedankenExperiment demonstrates beyond any doubt that the behavior of the photon in the interferometer depends on the choice of the observable which is measured, even when that
choice is made at a position and a time such that it is separated from the entrance of the photon"
>"We, now, by moving the mirror in or out have an unavoidable effect on what we have a right to say about the already past history of that photon"
http://www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-174876.html

http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0610241

ps. i really don`t care if you think me and these scientists are not skeptical enough. If you want to rely on solipsism, fine.
I only tried to point out here these claims like "it`s just because of the interactions" are easy said, but not so based statements.

>>2491922

>This allowed a "delayed choice" of the observer, i.e. a choice made after the presumed photon would have cleared the midstream barrier containing two parallel slits.
>According to the results of the double slit experiment, if experimenters do something to learn which slit the photon goes through, they change the outcome of the experiment and the behavior of the photon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheeler%27s_delayed_choice_experiment

>"Our realization of Wheeler’s delayed choice
GedankenExperiment demonstrates
beyond any doubt that the behavior
of the photon in the interferometer
depends on the choice of the observable
which is measured, even when that
choice is made at a position and a time
such that it is separated from the entrance
of the photon"
>"We, now, by moving the mirror in or out have an unavoidable effect on what we have a right to say about the already past history of that photon"
http://www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-174876.html

http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0610241

ps. i really don`t care if you think me and these scientists are not skeptical enough. If you want to rely on solipsism, fine.
I only tried to point out here these claims like "it`s just because of the interactions" are easy said, but not so based statements.

>>2491658
>The only reason this is counter-intuitive is because it is not widely understood that there is no such thing as a non-interactive observation.

It has been verified that observations had effected the state of a particle BEFORE the actual measuring/interactive observations did takes place.

So the conclusion that the state of particles are only effected because of the interactions is not an enclosed conclusion.
It requires the assumption of determinism, or a many worlds/many minds-like reality. Both of these interpretations are far-fetched and ridiculous assumptions.

Why not just accept the facts as we perceive them? Some things are mystery by definition.

electrosex_8ik3k7ud.mp4

http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=263882&id=147897627269&ref=mf

>>2491281

The issue you mentioned is exactly what we have the word "infinity" for.

You could apply infinity to a different set of dimensions. like space and numbers.

Thus the essence of your paradox is not necessarily about "time", it`s about the absurdity of infinity, which is real existent.

>>2491300
>You don't have free will

PEOPLE LIKE YOU MAKE THIS PLACE THE SEWER DRAIN OF THE INTERNETS.

Psychopathic people come here to spew thier bullshit in the hope that at least one person on the whole internets agrees with him.

FUCK OFF.

>>2491300
>You don't have free will

PEOPLE LIKE YOU MAKE THIS PLACE THE SEWER DRAIN OF THE INTERNETS.

Psychopathic people come here to spew thier bullshit in the hope that at least one person on the whole internets agrees with him.

FUCK OFF.

>>2491300
>You don't have free will

PEOPLE LIKE YOU MAKE THIS PLACE THE SEWER DRAIN OF THE INTERNETS.

Psychopathic people come here to spew thier bullshit in the hope that at least someone one on the internets agrees with them.

FUCK OFF.

come