[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.10587975 [View]
File: 8 KB, 454x146, waste.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10587975

Why doesn't this work?

>> No.10587970 [View]
File: 25 KB, 1122x201, simple.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10587970

>>10587963

>> No.10587966 [View]

>>10587962
Correct, the real one has to do with the infinite series and natural logarithms.

>> No.10587957 [View]

>>10587947
I am OP, do you think it's even possible to alter that formula to a prime formula?

I don't. :)

>> No.10587945 [View]

>>10587926
That was the joke.

>> No.10587938 [View]

>>10587926
I know that.
>>10587928
The points plotted are the prime numbers, there is currently NO formula or function that plots the prime numbers efficiently.

>> No.10587923 [View]

Oh, this one looks like a dilemma, what ever shall the mathematicians do?

>> No.10587920 [View]
File: 10 KB, 200x200, download (4).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10587920

>2x-x
Oops, that doesn't sound right at all! :)

I think it had something to do with natural logarithms now that I try to remember it...

>> No.10587876 [View]
File: 62 KB, 1231x557, equation2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10587876

Hey what are your thoughts on this? My math skills are extremely rusty since it's been billions of years since I invented math.

>> No.10578925 [View]

>>10578924
Mine's better than your definition.

>> No.10578923 [View]

The Future is good.

I already know that there are some people who think they have predicted it or seen it already, but they are wrong unless they agree with me of course.

>> No.10578919 [View]

>>10578912
I'm not schizophrenic. I'm not trying to prove anything to you so that was never an invitation for you to try to prove me wrong (which you can't anyways.)

>> No.10578916 [View]

>>10578907
Obsessive + Assertive + Aggressive = (Good grades, correct answers, good contributions to science) =/= Smart

>> No.10578913 [View]

>>10578907
That's not true.
They produce results which is what dumb people obsess over.

I mean, back in the day, if somebody could beat the shit out of everybody, people valued him more.

If some guy made some dumb prediction and he was right, people would agree with him above science.

The Truth =/= The Observable.

Science is illusions at its finest.

>> No.10578908 [View]

>>10578904
I think your greatest achievement in life was talking to me twice saying two two-word responses to me.

They could have been better words though, but still you should be honored.

Regardless, I declare that if you say it a third time, you are a poopoo peepee head.

>> No.10578906 [View]

>>10578898
You've said plenty of invalid things before.
Your statement is not always valid. Your statement that a schizophrenic could also have delusions of granduer.

Reminder that probability is irrelevant in this problem.

If schizophrenia is true than sure delusions could be true.
If not, then well...

You see the logic?

>> No.10578900 [View]

>>10578899
Don't try to copy me to make a demonstration to me. Because I am genuine and you are fake, trying to copy a genuine one will not be fruitful because you can never copy what I have.

>> No.10578896 [View]

>>10578885
>>10578889
I am fine thanks.
The problem is why are you all trying to talk to me like this instead of just leaving me alone?

>> No.10578893 [View]

>>10578883
Likely =/= 100%
100% = Proof
Likely =/= Proof

You've got to be kidding me if you are doubting me yet you don't realize that you're "proof" didn't prove anything.

Do you even know what likely means? Something is true or untrue, probability fillings are what's irrelevant. Probability is what is irrelevant here.

Yes.

You seem like a liar, but maybe you are just trying to prove it to yourself? The better question is, why would you try to prove to me that I'm wrong even if I'm right? What do you gain by doing this? If you disagree then please just leave me alone.

>> No.10578878 [View]

>>10578874
Literally ANYBODY can do ANYTHING in science if they try hard enough. This is why most scientists are not actually smart at all, they are just OBSESSIVE freaks. Because obsessive, aggressive, and assertive people are the most-likely to try the hardest to beat everybody else. Smart people often don't bother with such a shitty field as science.

>> No.10578876 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 19 KB, 300x100, 76.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10578876

Literally ANYBODY can do ANYTHING in science if they try hard enough. This is why most scientists are not actually smart at all,

they are just OBSESSIVE freaks. Because obsessive, aggressive, and assertive people are the most-likely to try the hardest to beat everybody else.

Smart people often don't bother with such a shitty field as science.

I invented math by the way.

>> No.10578865 [View]

I thought scientists were supposed to be logical, not irrational jerks...
If only...

>> No.10578863 [View]

>>10578859
Well let me rephrase, it can be erased but there is always someone who can watch the past like a tv but with all details intact. Lmao. Lol.

>> No.10578859 [View]

The past cannot be erased.

Navigation
View posts[-24][+24][+48][+96]