/sci/ - Science & Math

I = 1.5
A IIII = 12
B IIII = 24
C IIII = 36
D IIII = 48

1A IIII = 60
A1 IIII = 72
B1 IIII = 84
1B IIII = 96
C1 IIII = 108
1C IIII = 120
DI IIII = 132
1D IIII = 144

ABC IIII = 156
ACB IIII = 168
BAC IIII = 180
BCA IIII = 192
CAB IIII = 204
CBA IIII = 216
-
EFG IIII = 228
EGF IIII = 240
FEG IIII = 246
FGE IIII = 258
GEF IIII = 270
GFE IIII = 282

Correct maths. I GUARENTEE YOU, that

XXXX IIII (the final step) = 2012,
any takers on that?

Yes it approves of timecube.
"First God created the Heaven and Earth"
Existing only as opposites.
"The Earth was without form and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep, and the spirit of god was hovering above the face of the waters"
Spirit of God - Yellow triangle
Waters - Orange triangle
Face of the deep - the top line.
"Let there be light"
The creation of opposites, like a mirror image.
"Seen that the light was good and seperated the light from the darkness"
3Diflying turning the image into a cube.
"Called the night day, and the darkness light, and evening and morning"
Causing rotation.

Rotate 45 degrees = circle.
Rotate 45 x 4 creates the bigger star shape I shown.

Then rotate that 45x4 image by 22.5,
then 11.25
the continue going lower, by halving the amount.
You essentially travel back in time and see the beginning, and thereafter the end.
>>1408025
>>1408025
>>1408025

Wow dude, you've got me addicted to this.

£10,000 says

xxxx - IIII = 2012

They may have tried different combinations,

For example

4A IIII = 206
A4 IIII = 218

Who knows?

4A IIII = 206
4B IIII = 218
4C IIII = 230
4D IIII = 242

I guess here it would be:

14A IIII = 254
14B IIII = 266
14C IIII = 278
14D IIII = 290

24A = 302
24B = 314
24C = 326
24D = 338

A IIII = 12
B IIII = 24
C IIII = 36
D IIII = 48

1A IIII = 60
1B IIII = 72
1C IIII = 84
1D IIII = 96

2A IIII = 108
2B IIII = 120
2C IIII = 132
2D IIII = 146

3A IIII = 158
3B IIII = 170
3C IIII = 182
3D IIII = 194

That's exactly how our universe, time, creation, works/happend. You're ignorent.
>>1407910
>>1407910
>>1407910

NO I LIE

A IIII = 12
B IIII = 24
C IIII = 36
D IIII = 48

1A IIII = 60
1B I = 61.5

E IIII
would be 60
61 doesn't exist in bab numerals
only 61.5
which would be
F I

now I've prooved god exists, does science still cry and troll as before? yes, thats science for you.

I created a cube in 4 steps,
>>1407874
>>1407874

herp derp
im a scientist derp
i ignore every question i can't answer herp
>>1407859
>>1407859
>>1407859

Ignorence wont get you nowhere punks,
If I die for this then I'm guarenteed heaven, so I couldn't care less. If you don't respect me for that then you'll goto hell. I'm literally what YOU picture Jesus as, but jesus is the SUN, not that hero you picture.

I think you need hell.
>>1407811

NO MATTER HOW BIG THE LINE IS, YOU CAN ALWAYS SPLIT IT INTO 4 QUARTERS, BY HALVING IT, THEN QUATERING IT.
SO THEREFORE YOU CAN CREATE THE SAME FUCKING DIAGRAM USING ANY SIZED LINE.

YOU'RE TAUGHT LITERAL '.' WORSHIP. YOU WORSHIP A FUCKING DOT, DO YOU NOT SEE HOW RETARDED YOU ARE.

/rant off

Woman,
Say what you said yesterday

"Science is only a product of how I interpret my enviroment" or whatever.

Please

God - 1.5
Science - 1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/600-cell
>tard
>>1407719
>>1407719
>>1407719
>>1407719

We make mathmatical equations using 1, 2, 3, 4
when we should use
1.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
as solid numbers
1.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
1.75
2.75
3.75
4.75

Mayans were right all along.
>>1407715
>>1407715
>>1407715

hey dude, lady, w/e

you said something yesterday liek

'everythinng i observe is a product of my enviroment' or somethinng,

can you say it again? pleasee

taking a wild guess here:

we're not meant to 1 x 1, as a whole number
but rather
1.5 x 1.5

our so called solid '1' is false
and we should always us .5 as a whole.

no problem guys,

6.6 pixels

holy moly, i'm correct

Yes but am I rite?
>>1407645
>>1407645
>>1407645

this persons eyes are open, you cannot tell her/him that he/her is a troll because of that, your judgement is false and therefore you are stupid.