/sci/ - Science & Math

>>1484143
this method is pretty unstoppable though
with the antibodies applied and the cancer cells covered in the nanoparticles, it's more of a mechanical issue of "how much heat can the tumor take"?

hey /sci/
how does it feel to know that cancer might be as much of an inconvenience as a broken arm within 5 years or so?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ux5QG0eqFqQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_p7TAp2WGg&feature=related

and yes, 100% kill rate on rat and rabbit tumors, you heard that right.

>>1483637
yeah, and it basically has no brain. it's immortal but dumb as a rock

aging gene, it's there, and it's the first thing cancer cells "turn off" before going wacko

we'd need a reliable way to prevent cancer and/or easily treat it before we try removing the aging gene entirely

>>1481180
>Point B) You can not observe atoms with light, because atoms are smaller than the wavelength of light.

always wondered why atoms were not visible with light, IT ALL MAKES SENSE NOW

>>1476803
i know
i was talking about feasibility
like; has anyone worked out the process by which the robots would produce the solar panels? chemically? has anyone even tried?

>>1476779
i
what

>>1476410
well, solar panel pavers. just any way to convert regolith into long solar panel sheets

aged?
moon colonization is a big thing with /sci/, what's the deal

how feasible is it to make robots which suck up moon regolith and poop out solar panels en masse (even if they're low efficiency)?

in addition, how feasible would it be to use some kind of plasticizer mixed with moon dust then extruded like toothpaste by a robot into dome shapes? (pressurized pueblos)

i saw both of these in some space program on science channel, i never found it again

how feasible is it to make robots which suck up moon regolith and poop out solar panels en masse (even if they're low efficiency)?

in addition, how feasible would it be to use some kind of plasticizer mixed with moon dust then extruded like toothpaste by a robot into dome shapes? (pressurized pueblos)

i saw both of these in some space program on science channel, i never found it again

>>1462649
>hurr electrical engineering has electrical in its name and superconductor = more electricity = better everything hurr
2/10

>>1462651
this
i mean, singularity isn't tomorrow but i'd be really confused if it didn't drop this century.

>>1453872
>push bullshit CO2 equated with temperature rise crap
>people buy it
>reduce CO2 emissions to near 0
>OH NO IT DOESN'T MATTER IT WONT STABILIZE FOR CENTURIES

then why bother?

>>1449655
car viable fuel cells are proably 6-10 years off, most of the problem right now is finding the right membrane, and that's all polymer science research

how likely do you think it is that the standard model is, at least in some part, incorrect.

I.E; the higgs boson is never found, and a more fitting gravitational model is found that explains inflation without relying on dark matter/energy

>>1447288
that's what i'm hoping, i was just giving a super generous estimate

>>1446989
because think of how we're headed, and how fast we are advancing our computer technology. I mean shit, we have a really basic superbrain already; the internet, cloud computing

within 300 years we could easily make self-replicating robots that make a dyson swarm around the sun and communicate with laser pulses. each has the computing power of a laptop but millions of these things would be communicating. It'd be an immensely powerful supercomputer. and that's ONLY 300 years, blink of an eye

>>1442788
given the immensity of the universe it's almost doubtless there are other sentient beings out there.
the trouble comes with how numerous they are and if they want to communicate

>>1441932
yes, in fact that's pretty much the staple of a kind of theoretical warp drive (with hypothetically infinite speed)

PROBLEM; the interior of the bubble would be BATHED in hawking radiation, obliterating anything inside, shielded or not.

nope
runner slows down just as much as the train
it's physic's self defense mechanism!

>>1438914
problem; entanglement is point to point, not broadcast

HOW TO TROLL HUMANITY

dark matter and energy have no mass and do not interact with matter in any way except gravitationally

GOOD LUCK DETECTING IT

>>1435468
doubt that
they might see us as primitive and strange, kind of like how the modern industrialized world views the bushmen people in Australia. we don't really look down on them as ants, just much simpler people.