/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4317695

the fuck?

at my grad school, a 3.0 is necessary to remain in good standing. the lowest grade you can get is a B. B would be the equivalent of a C or D.

>thread about Dawkins
>bullshit in between
...
>misogyny and feminism suddenly.

what the fuck.

I'll come. Let me hook up my headphones.

>>4306208

No fucking way.

>>4293483

/sci/ isn't /a/ or /jp/. They're the ones with the silly fucking concept of giving up your entire life for the sake of 4chan.

You tried this shit on /mu/ and /co/. /a/ and /jp/ are the only boards in which that nonsense applies. Fuck off.

>Engineering is for faggots.
>Engineering is gay.
>Math PhD, 300k starting.
>Biology is a soft science.

All of these are memes on /sci/. No one in their right mind takes these things seriously.

Biology is a great field of study and its contributions to science are vast. The meme of
>biology
>a hard science

started in mid-to-late 2011. The guy who popularized it literally made eight front page threads for about two or three days. Literally, the guy had no life. From there, the drones caught on and ever since, we've had an infestation.

Engineering is for faggots, though. Seriously.

ITT: Engineers.

To answer you, no. I would not.

The OP image suggests that /sci/ is intelligent.

For the most part, it isn't.

>>4180147
Nope.

Shit, I actually forgot aether. There was me, aether, EK and someone else.

Out of all of the tripfags, TN5 is probably the best one out of all of us. Bruised is the best namefag on this board. The best anonymous poster is "ChemGuy," who ALWAYS stays anonymous no matter what. Fuck, that guy bleeds physics and chemistry. Pure genius.

Josef is pretty good and reliable; so was Filenamefag.

Feels good to be the only tripfag not in that picture, even though I've been here the longest.

Well, EK matches me in length.

>>4179879
>>4179854

Oh shit.

CAT FIGHT.

>>4178713

You can already screen out genetic abnormalities/defects.

Parents can be informed that their children will have down-syndrome or whatever else whilst the fetus is still in the womb. Womp, womp, womp.

Anything else, such as brown hair/blue eyes, is clearly vanity and not science.

>>4175993
I don't think you see the difference because you haven't really experienced it.

Sadly, it's not something that can be explained. It's something that needs to be felt. What this other individual is trying to convey, in addition to myself, won't really hit you because you've never experienced it yourself.

It's like describing color to a person who was blind from birth. They just haven't experienced it, and they won't until their sight is cured(sometimes never cured).

>>4175987
>i open up 'open up to emotionally and mentally' with haz, shes a friend, but i dont wanna fuck her, what the hell is the difference??

There's a huge difference. The way I interacted with my girlfriend, whom I loved deeply, was in stark contrast to how I interacted with my best male friend and close female friends.

There's a large dichotomy.

>>4175978
>erm yeh, kinda

Oh, EK. We can't be in a relationship if you're fucking several guys. :( I expect monogamy in our relationship.

>>4175975
>>4175975

>The FWB relationship indirectly implies that, although you enjoy being around the person emotionally and sexually, you do not see a viable future with them or a relationship in which you can fully expose vulnerability.

>It's indirectly saying that the person isn't good enough for a relationship, but good enough for a fuck & friendship. Seriously. That sounds cold/harsh, but that's the truth.

>>4175953
Vulnerability, EK. Emotional vulnerability.

You know, someone you can open up to emotionally and mentally. Someone different from a friend.

>>4175942
>yeh, very close friends, they definitely arnt just 'anybody'
really great guys.

You're in a FWB with several guys?.................

>>4175944

>you stuck up cunt?

Chill, man. Don't try to let her rile you up. EK has very unique views on life and relationships. This isn't the first time.

>>4175929

The FWB relationship indirectly implies that, although you enjoy being around the person emotionally and sexually, you do not see a viable future with them or a relationship in which you can fully expose vulnerability.

It's indirectly saying that the person isn't good enough for a relationship, but good enough for a fuck & friendship. Seriously. That sounds cold/harsh, but that's the truth.

>>4175905
>im the unusual one.

Right now you are. Allow me to assure you of this: You will want to form a relationship, a lasting relationship, with a member of the opposite sex. This yearn won't make you weak, nor will it make you strong. It's just something that is at the core of our humanity. Making social connections is imperative; a strong social connection, such as a relationship between two mates, is fiercely fought for.

Even the denizens of /sci/ want a relationship, though you may have the few aspies who talk shit about, 'DEEZ JUS KEMIKALS IN DA BREIN N IT AINT REELS.' Those people will commit suicide sooner or later anyway, so fuck them. You're not aspie as fuck, but you are a bit quirky.

Let's fuck, EK. I know you haven't had a good dicking in a while.

>>4175883
>and i wont ever want, or need, a proper boyfriend.

All women say that until they fall in love.

As for the bad start? Well, if it's any consolation, that's my way of being affectionate. See, I'm a good potential boyfriend after all.

>>4175878

Most of the time, that's how it is. It's not even about buying shit. Money plays a role into it from time to time, but not all of the time.

I don't know the OP, but I can pretty much assure you that the girl manipulated him into believing something more from time to time when, in reality, she just wasn't into him. Girls treat guys differently who have feelings for them. Most of them manipulate.

I remember one girl who friendzoned me and treated me like that actually sat in my lap, caressed my neck basically brushed her tits against my face. When I tried making a move, it was always the, ''oh i don't like you like that, we're just really good friends and i feel OH~SO~COMFORTABLE with you. also, i have a boyfriend!" It gets too irritating at times.

The fact of the matter is, most women fuck with guys who like them. If it's not financially, it's emotionally. Emotionally is the worst. If the OP is just being a bitch made nigga because she just said flat-out no to his advance(s) and he's one of these "STOP NOT LIKING WHAT I LIKE" guys, then what I said doesn't apply to him. Judging by the tone of his post, though, I highly doubt that.

>>4175864
>i suck at relationships, ive never really had a proper formal one where we actually ever decided to be boyfriend and girlfriend, i dont even like the word, so i just call it 'being friends' and then its easier.

EK, I'll be your boyfriend. I'll treat you right, my juicy bitch.

>>4175852

Secondly, I don't the majority of you bitches even comprehend the notion of the FRIENDZONE.

The friendzone isn't about, ''herp derp, i like a girl and she made me a friend.'' The concept of the 'friendzone' is much, much deeper.

It's about a woman manipulating a man and acquiring certain gains from him whilst he has feelings for her. She is taking advantage of him and completely eviscerating his emotions without regard to his personage. Secondly, she is making him an emotional foot stool she can let loose upon when/if anything occurs in her life that she deems unsatisfactory. If it was about a girl rejecting a guy sexually, but accepting him as a friend, that would be a different story; the friendzone issue is not that.

Most guys don't blame the bitch for putting him in the friendship category. They blame the girl for leading him on for making him think that something more could blossom, and that is what's wrong. Even if the guy tries to move on, she utilizes certain words/terms/gestures to make him think that he's still in the running/competition when he lost the race so many moons ago.

This is what women fail to understand. You don't fuck us over by putting us in the friendship category; you fuck us over by manipulating us, knowing full well of our feelings for you. This is the classic friendzone issue.