/sci/ - Science & Math

haha it's great how his face gets so distorted when he's angry, good work on the comic op!

>>4415061

i been on my grind irl

>>4415065

implying its not every thinking person's duty to challnege said norms

>>4415043

gendering of names is a false binary perpetrated by kyriarchy, n00b

death to all mans

it's the only science

harry daghlian died for your sins

>>4284316

>smart people listen to mozart
>i listen to mozart

we must be exceptionally wary of claims about how smart op is

mmmm that's good confirmation bias

>>4274796

if everyone had had that attitude we would never have gotten parahutes

>>4274792

maybe in post-enlightenment western society but to posit that as some sort of universal condition of humankind is kinda lulzy

>>4274775

why do you so readily assume that rationality is important/desirable

creative writing

following the revolution bourgeois technicians will be liquidated

in a very real sense it is the only science

true psychoanalysis, that is, not this nonsense about serotonin and ganglia

how can something be depressing though if psychology isn't a real science

not implode, explode, because of the decreased pressure

it's like the opposite of deep sea diving

[spoiler]not the government, the house of windsor and the grain cartels</spoiler>

[spoiler]>>4265720

no it's just your dad watching tv in his briefs again</spoiler>

[spoiler]yes, ultimately the cutting implement and the substance being cut will each be a 50-50 mixture of both</spoiler>

>>4264679

when have you ever seen anyone on /sci/ interested in curing diseases? didn't you see the anons saying that the borders of india should be closed off and the whole population allowed to die of tuberculosis?

>>4264617

that is why the study of literature is infinitely more complex though

no rubrics to hide behind, no rigorous proofs to tell you the right answer -- it's up to you to distinguish between "bullshit" and the genuine article -- it is a game full of pitfalls and danger

it is, yes, why it may be easier for lackluster pupils to "bullshit" in the humanities, but it is also why it is possible to achieve greater things in literature than science coudl ever aspire to

[spoiler]>>4264535

how does the absence of people justify exploitation though? shouldn't the attitude of the scientist be "what can we learn?" as opposed to "what value can we extract?"</spoiler>

>>4264541

a whole bakery's worth of neckbread

>>4264523

well really it might be a case of him being a bad writer or it might be the case that you as an astrophysicist aren't familiar enough with literature to evaluate it properly

i mean if i started critiquing your astrophuysics you wouldn't take it seriously, why should your critique of his writing be taken seriously