/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4608087
i wasnt ITT at the start, and you can drop the fucking attitude, troll.

>>4608089
perhaps initially
but, as always, the thread moves on.
we were talking about science.

>>4608074
the thread was reported before? thats why it 404'd?
why?

>>4608070
rule number 1: never post a pic more interesting than your post

as to your question: they're all good courses IMO, just pick the one you enjoy the most

>>4608062
>common troll tactic
>'(inb4 mushrooms)' - OP
<<<

fucking thread 404'd while i was trying to post.

>>4608015
https://archive.installgentoo.net/sci/thread/S4607423#p4608015
fuck off, if they say 'hi', i can say it back.

>>4608020
https://archive.installgentoo.net/sci/thread/S4607423#p4608020
organs can grow, they arnt magically limited so that every single organ in every person grows to exactly the same size.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091109173612.htm

>>4608026
https://archive.installgentoo.net/sci/thread/S4607423#p4608026
no, they really do have more cells (adipose cells are larger as well, but there are also more of them)
http://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/life/human-biology/fat-cell.htm

>>4608019
Op said:
>'[is it] possible to culture small/simple organs?'
he never said it had to be from a single cell, but i get your point.

>>4608014
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_protein
>"Motor proteins are a class of molecular motors that are able to move along the surface of a suitable substrate."

>>4607997
yanktards wouldnt know when to laugh, most of the jokes go over their stupid fucking heads...

thats shit pisses me off in 'friends' as well

>>4607990
we dont do about human erections in fucking zoology!

i do know how they work, theres no actual bone, it fills with blood and gets hard
the only thing i was wrong about is that i thought guys can do it at will (and im pretty sure they could, if they just use there will to think about sex and induce it...so im still kinda right anyway, so fuck you)

>>4607987
they probably do actually, things are usually pretty much in proportion. lardasses need a big heart to pump blood all around their much larger fucking bodies
also, your points moot anyway, because they'd still have all those extra fat and skin cells, which still ups their cell count even if organs are exactly teh same size between fat and skinny people (they arnt)

>>4607982
still yes.
and what links are you looking for?
it does exist at least
http://www.amsbio.com/alvetex.aspx?gclid=CNvp19rTy68CFY8PfAod-1HNaQ

if you want more detail, i'll need specifics

>>4607979
>Second, not in 10 years.
http://www.webmd.com/news/20101029/first-human-liver-grown-in-lab

yes, to both
(btw, all cell cultures are 3D anyway, even if just very thin.)

>>4607958
fuck off, if you;re trying to find example posts of me being stupid, you could have done a hell of a lot better than that.

>By the way, remember that time you didn't know how erections worked?
fucking exaggeration, i know how erections work, i just thought it was a conscious choice, thats just a very small difference, i still know how they work physiologically.

>>4607947
well, for something like this they'll be huge ranges on it.
if were just talking adult human bodies, then you still have all the range between really short anorexic people, and big fat lardasses who weigh several times that. the fat person will have a lot more cells

>they count perhaps 200 cells on a slide, estimate the percentage of surface area it should occupy, then extrapolate that number to fill some average of intrauterine surface.
also, i would do it by weight rather than surface area, theres cells on the inside too, ya'know?
take the weight ratio of the full person compared to the weight of the cell sample.
count the cells in teh sample, and extrapolate up
(not perfect, some cells weigh more than others, but you'll be close)

>>4607932
>/surrender

>>4607936
i'll be called samefag for that...

>>4607906
nothing wrong with that posts
yes, scientific theories ARE potentially falseifyable, but the theories that are true stand the test of time, and are never proved wrong (e.g. you wont ever prove gravity wrong, thas what i meant in my post. or evolution either, or germ theory, or any other scientific theory we are definitely sure is correct)

>>4607900
hi

>>4607890
yeh, so i havent memorsied the fact
your point?
making up math/stats/facts to back up your point is a fucking creationist tactic, even if i dont know the true fact off the top of my head, im still perfectly justified to call the poster out for blatantly making shit up on a fucking science board!

>>4607882
>Now stop being so female.
fuck off, prick

its not useless trivia, these are scientific facts
thats the point in science, we want to know the truth about the world and life and the universe and about how it all works
people are curious, knowing how many cells there are, or any other fact, if its true, its still interesting and good to know

if you dont like science, then fuck off

>>4607866
course not, your rage sustains me.

>>4607863
>useless fucking trivia
>being scientifically accurate
oh fuck you!

>>4607854
yup

>>4607828
>17M*100 = epithelial cell lining
i fucking hate it when tards trying to make a point just make up the math as they go along...