/sci/ - Science & Math

>First 5 posts are the starting topics.
>It's of bests that they're simplified – but also from the posters' most intense, recent interests.
>Responding to posts – either/and is ..
•addition (pathing),
•boundary-ing (grouping / "this is a maximum until .."),
•possessing ("this is .. me .. because .."),
•redaction / exclusion (nominating subjection to a previous post's boundary-ing / inquiring relevance / other aspects of deletion / returning).

>>11090906
>mewing is just normal oral posture
>mewing doesnt work once youre in your mid teens
Bones are re-formable at 10% / year. That's a very low estimation because of how minimalistic diets are for full nutrition (~1%).

>>11087262
>>11088935
"The term weed also is applied to any plant that grows or reproduces aggressively".

>>11088371
>Can you explain in simple turn, is iq genetic or not..
"Sorta". Genetic similarity is listed as 99.5% – but is possibly 100%. It comes from nutrition and behavior, being defined by even repeats of looks / gestures. It's being actively switched around what's activated, and the status is passable to offspring.

The problems are ..
A). full nutrition, especially fundamental cellular building blocks, but also further substrates for ~optimizations (metabolites of energy; compounds producing specific effects; and supplements for neurochemical metabolites) ..
B). "health and behavior", deriving from hormones, which are further caused by eating habits (e.g., calorie distribution), musculature, and BF%. Also associated are appetites, flavors, sensations, libido, and orgasm.

Humanity has basically been malnutritioned for thousands of years ..

––

"Can you explain, in a simplicity, the relevance of ~IQ."

>other initial uses for this new computational capability may include optimization, machine learning, materials science and chemistry
>[non serial-comma]

>>11086505
>P1 - Humans are of moral value
>P2 - There is no trait absent in animals which if absent in humans would cause us to deem ourselves valueless.
>C - Therefore without establishing the absence of such a trait in animals, we contradict ourselves by deeming animals valueless
Animals are (being quite) irrelevant to establishing an ultimate (of "A to") B.

Another, more specific, example is their lack of "trained-ness" – "socioeconomic" skillfulness and efficacy.

>>11083150
"Full nutrition" is such a rarity amongst diets (~some 1%) and scholarly articles that most physiological correlations are "barely relevant", especially because energy levels, personality, social interest and investment, skillfulness, appearance-features, and other aspects of genetic expression are basing on nutriments.

>>11082859
Is an example. The dietary omega 3 (evidenced benefiting telomere lengths, and thus of its utility in building up cellular environments, and youth) is simply usually not there – protein amounts, potency of antioxidants, all vitamins and minerals, nutrient availability and timing amongst digestion rates and insulinogenics, substrates of epinephrine, dopamine, melatonin, and serotonin (being available OTC).

Hungers are associated with energy homeostasis, cholinergic-dopaminergic rewards, neurotrophy, et al. (and are even required for rewards from alcohol or food) – productivity, motivation, energy, and awards. There are correlative optimizations for increased GH, decreased T, (even thus) greater amounts of T .. which, even in women, heightens sensation, libido, and orgasm. So, sensory and behavioral benefits are huge, including ~optimizations of hormonal responses for energy, fun, stimulation, intensity, and (thusly) happiness and intelligence. Propagation of cellular chemicals is simple. Humans are *very* proficient at A to B, and actually having metabolites is obviously of much more potential.

Physiology is basing on nutrition.

An example of a mystery is
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta-Methylamino-L-alanine .. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/

https://desuarchive.org/fit/thread/52678538/#52679933