/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11126316

Favorite Mathematics and Science In Action Topics

>>11124895 and >>11124912 are bannable.

The truth is that SSRIs, specifically, are dangerous because of blocking serotonin in some areas even though it's used for clotting blood – potentially causing bleeding.

Similar negatives are found in other neurochemical medications. "Blocking re-uptake is stupid."

––

More accurately and "overall" is that full nutrition is really rare amongst diets (some 1%) and scholarly articles ..

>>11123310
>>immortality
"Full nutrition" is a rarity amongst diets (some 1%) and scholarly articles.

Furthermore is – with specifics such as heights most correlating to protein intakes (and, obviously, other nutrients), omega 3s benefiting telomere lengths (evidencing a role in building up cellular environments / youth), "all vitamins and minerals", the mediocre ORAC of most antioxidants, and how effective OTC substrates of neurochemicals (L-DOPA for epinephrine and dopamine; 5-HTP for melatonin and serotonin) are for positive mood (etc.) – "the plausible greatness of humans".

>>11123346
>entropy. you can't unscramble an egg and all that
Humans are way more complex. The more reasonable analogy is "self-repairing robots".

There are zero genes associated with producing negative aspects of aging. In fact, simply getting proper nutrition is a *very* logical, simple method of eternal youth.

PS: Some specific boundaries of common understanding are how much of and what exactly is (all of) vitamin C, and other vitamins and minerals; returning GULO functionality ..

>>11112541

>>11112007
"GULO deactivation (from ascorbate biosynthesis)".

>>11111661
> >>11112897

>>11111314
>>11111362
Energy levels, personality, social interest and investment, skillfulness, and other aspects of genetic expression are basing on nutriments.

(Racism was dropped when social benefits were found.)

Standards and results are much more amongst proper humanity / objectivity.

>>11111359
>>11111742
> >>11112897

>>11112788
>PS: Soi*

>>11112952
That's baseless. Even if the survivor is ~ an individual, "the universe as it and a being" is really proficient at getting "what it values".

(>>11112956)
.. E.g., such as "heteronormativity".
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12213516/

>>11112952
That's baseless. Even if the survivor is ~ an individual, "the universe as it and a being" is really proficient at getting "what it values".

(>>11112956)
.. E.g., such as "heteronormativity".
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12213516/

>>11112910
•A "neutral" AI is potentially the biggest army.
•According to Game Theory, human leaders are still more fun.
•An obvious option is having secrets hidden / stored-up and allowing some individuals competition / etc.
So, ~ "the better option is safety, socialization, and entertainment". Especially amongst eternal life, this is simple mathematics.

•IQ only alludes to some aspects of intelligence, proven by the fact that a lot of high IQs are had, yet humanity is still amongst dense mediocrity.
•Genetics are hugely overestimated in relevance. Genes are some 99.5% similar, potentially 100%, somewhat often activated and deactivated based on behaviors, and are thusly passable to offspring. Energy levels, personality, social interest and investment, skillfulness, and other aspects of genetic expression are basing on nutrition (of which, "full variety" is some 1% of diets, and a similar rarity amongst scholarly articles – evidencing both huge potential for humanity, and the minimalistic and further plausibility of associations / results.
•Basically every "thing" (of simple industrial availability, and personal health and entertainment) is solved. Prevention and cures for cancer and tangle-diseases are already available (though this actually public). Food availability, eternal youth, objectivity in standards, energy production, and other "innovations" are already solved. (Researching modern AI began in the 1950s. Google has an example 11 billion parameters "for loading, preprocessing, mixing, and evaluating datasets" on Github. Et al. ..)

Each industry / "life genre" has its specifics, and knowledge / performance is really simple.

>>11111047
Times are used in science and mathematics plenty enough for ~relevance to ordinary and advanced conversation.

>>11112709
You're still arguing from ignorance.

PS: Onions was evidenced reducing estrogen levels.

Another subtopic is defining QoL metrics (of "health" and "socioeconomics").

>Job / option availability vs. population density (~ of an area which you're interested in experiencing).
>Quality Adjusted Life Year.
>Values of various niches.
>Correlations to and of the economy.
..

•https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_theory
•https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decision_theory
•https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbolic_discounting / https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_economics
•https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expected_utility_hypothesis
•https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_economics
•https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equation_of_exchange
•https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumption-based_capital_asset_pricing_model
•https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efficient-market_hypothesis
•https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_walk_hypothesis

>>11112667
>>11112681
"No."

>>11110836

Here's an example
––
•Fundamental Nutrition.
>Vitamins, minerals, protein, omega 3, antioxidants, extra metabolites for cellular energy and hormones and neurochemicals (epinephrine, dopamine, and serotonin) ..
•Further Food, Beverage, and Compounds: Types, Effects, and Benefits.
>Extracts, powders, crops / DIY, recipes, methods ..
>Also relevant: Specific outcomes and their co-/chemicals.
•Living Potentiation: Situations, Scenarios, Options, and Money.
>(Not necessarily "your job" – automation is plausible for making all positions extraneous – but maybe "what gets you from associating with low status, to high"). Money is obviously a huge subtopic, but these types of threads are great for discussing such specifics to much extent. An example is the variety of "colorful" opportunities mentioned / alluded to on BHW.
•Getting a First World Lifestyle.
>(Strength, flexibility, cardio, and especially nutrition are some of the largest definers of QoL – energy levels, personality, social interest and investment, skillfulness, and other aspects of genetic expression are very much deriving from nutrients and timing. Most "things" are vastly improvable or even are ~perfectable with abundant nutrition .. But (!) a few things such as pests and parasites are beyond "reasonable" conditions. Specifiably: The likelihood of parasitic propagation is so huge amongst birds; the meat industry; sashimi; *any* types of *rare* meat, even beef; and repeated and non-sanitized usage of food machinery ..).
•[Other categories]
––

The simple possibilities of subtopics and DIY, such as "survival" and "home living" derivations (from industrial-supplied, self-produced, and/or nature substrates), are obviously "dense" – e.g., "laboratory setups"; "cheaper, homemade appliances"; "'proprietary' electronics alternatives" – but science, media, and entertainment are still so amateur that it's both productive and simple.

Here's for amateur / comprehensive aspects of deriving QoL.

A few, fundamental, beneficial options ..
>Keeping the topic on scenarios and things.
>Categorization.
>Reduction / simplification.

1/2

..

>>11111015
"No."

Genes are some 99.5% similar, potentially 100%; and activations and de-activations are somewhat often, and passable to offspring.

Energy levels, personality, social interest and investment, skillfulness, and other aspects of genetic expression are basing on nutriments. "Full nutrition" is such a rarity amongst diets (some 1%) – so increasing intelligence is actually the plausibility ..

>>11110949
>>[Still 2 posters].
Your point's still predecessed by the other.

>>11110949
>>[Still 2 posters].
Your point's still preceded by the other.