/sci/ - Science & Math

>>1606621

I'm an Eastern Canadian, actually. I'm immune to your stereotypes! :)

>>1606614

Subsidies = corporatism

Fuck, I can't even EAT wheat, why should my tax dollars pay for it?

>>1606607

Statist assholes hijacked that term. I refuse to label myself as such.

>>1606594

Comparable to South-Africa....

>>1606586

Well, they DO already produce AR-15's, so they already have all the tooling and shit.

I'm unsure whether the BATFE would let them into the US, though.

>>1606584
>the dumb half

So I take you're anti-gun, against same-sex marriage, against the legalization of drugs, etc?

Because that's all authoritarian bullshit.

You'd figure that /sci/ would know anything about political science.

>>1606565
>>1606567

libertarianism is an entire half of the political spectrum. You're painting with a very broad brush.

I am economically centrist.

>>1606557

Hmmm... Some chinese made 80% receivers?

Maybe.

>>1606525

No, I'm actually Canadian.

If I wanted to make any sales to the US (much larger market, easy to ship to)...

Bump.

Denying anthropogenic global warming is not the same as denying climate change.

>>1606401

The US has an import ban on Chinese weapons that are deemed to not have a "sporting purpose" (It's bullshit, but that's another thread).

>I've been*

Blarg. I accidentally a word.

Hey there, /sci/.

/k/ here.

I've thinking of ways of rapidly manufacturing low-cost AR-15 lower receivers and other firearm components.

Then, I remembered this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3chSzLxPuzU

This guy just used plain ol' polyethylene, and he built it the sucker's way. It would be a lot easier to use a 3D Printer and then do any extra machining at the end. That way you save a lot of time and money on wasted materials while keeping the tolerances much tighter.

My question to you, /sci/ is more about the materials available for 3D Printers. Something a little bit more durable would be excellent.

Pic related. It's an AR-15 lower receiver.