[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.2284181 [View]
File: 74 KB, 240x240, nice try.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2284181

>2. You won't troll most of us. We're pretty smart.

>> No.2260109 [View]

>>2260016
>>2260010
>>2260005
>>2260002
>>2259995
>>2259986
>>2259984
>>2259981

Perfect. Love you, /sci/.

>> No.2259322 [View]

>>2259314

Your stubbornness in insisting your hypothesis is true despite it's total lack of evidence throughout this entire thread has left me not okay with it, so you're reading me wrong.

I didn't say a year and a half, I said half a year, which was a slight mistake as the typical semester is still shorter than that. Sorry.

My point was that changing the date which you enter higher education by one term should be considered a change at least as significant as whether or not you have wisdom teeth, yet it's okay to disregard that and not the presence of wisdom teeth by your logic. Your logic sucks.

>> No.2259308 [View]

>>2259302
So entering higher education now or half a year from now isn't a significant difference, but whether or not you have wisdom teeth is?

>>2259302

>this is about trend
>People without wisdom teeth on average are more likely to reproduce than people with wisdom teeth

[citation needed]

>> No.2259292 [View]

>>2259280

I'm saying the very scenario of two people being SO similar that wisdom teeth and wisdom teeth alone makes the difference in who gets laid is ludicrous.

>> No.2259288 [View]

>>2259275

It's not about the flat $200. It's about being within $.01 and $200 past the breaking point of even being willing to try.

It's like when people ask a professor to just give them an A because they scored an 89.7

Why shouldn't an A be given to an 89.6? Why should the line be drawn at 89.7 when it was already drawn at 90?

Lines exist, arbitrary or not, and it is possible to be small values below them. Those small values can be extremely significant in certain cases.

>> No.2259276 [View]

>>2259263
People have breaking points, even if they're not known or clear cut.

At a certain point, a person will be unable to take out such a large loan. That person could be $200 short of that point.

This shouldn't be difficult to grasp.

>> No.2259268 [View]

>>2259253
>We say that everything is the same as a hypothetical statement

Such a hypothetical statement is never valid in something as complex as this. In the real world, any two given people will have differences far more significant than wisdom teeth, on the off chance they even have that difference, making your ideas useless and unsupported.

>> No.2259252 [View]

>>2259246
Theoretically, people could be much more than $200 short, but there must be a point at which it would seem like too much to take out a loan and someone could be $200 short of that.

It's not as ridiculous an idea as "but if two people are EXACTLY THE SAME BESIDES WISDOM TEETH HURR..."

>> No.2259233 [View]

>>2259209
When is everything else EVER the same?

Show me identical twins raised by the same parents, given the same opportunities at everything that somehow don't have the same dental conditions and you'll have a point. It's impossible for everything else to be the same, you stubborn retard.

>> No.2259208 [View]

>>2259187
>buy

>> No.2259197 [View]
File: 232 KB, 500x379, 1287469283850.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2259197

>>2259153
This is stupid in so many ways.

You think wisdom teeth alone is enough of a pressure to make one person guaranteed to reproduce more than another?

You think wisdom teeth is enough to eventually form two different populations of humans?

Am I being trolled?

>> No.2259146 [View]

>>2259140
That doesn't make people with and without wisdom teeth different populations.

>> No.2244680 [View]

>>2244676
This is actually the most science thread in weeks.

>> No.2244588 [View]

>>2244578
The next step in the never-ending road of discovering pussy repellent.

Though it kept secret, it'd be a pretty damn efficient method.

>> No.2244566 [View]

>>2244564
Gonna have to apply the scientific method to dat ass. Now to begin my rigorous testing.

>> No.2243764 [View]

>>2243599
HCl dissociates much better than HF.

HCl is a strong acid and HF is a weak acid, but due to fluorine's electronegativity, a lot of compounds involving it bypass one or more chemical trends.

>> No.2239970 [View]

Organic Chemistry - Because I already smelled like shit.

>> No.2234816 [View]

>>2234795

You're completely right, but not practical. While efforts should focus on pregnancy prevention, such a change could never happen quickly.

>>2234782

Why is two months four weeks justifiable but not three months one week?

Two months in, the offspring isn't a single celled organism. At what point does it gain right and why?

Actually, nevermind. This debate doesn't belong in /sci/, I'm sorry.

>> No.2231976 [View]

>>2231883
>>2231813
>>2231766
Stop giving him attention, dumbshit. You are doing the very opposite of helping.

>> No.2228989 [View]
File: 150 KB, 578x398, cigarette.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2228989

>>2228916
That was beautiful.

>> No.2228906 [View]

Sagan's "Pale Blue Dot" and "A Dragon Live in my Garage," as well.

>> No.2228902 [View]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T69TOuqaqXI

Most basic of basics, everyone should watch it.

>> No.2228880 [View]

>>2228787
You post on /sci/ as well as /tg/? Man, you really -are- excellent.

Navigation
View posts[-96][-48][-24][+24][+48][+96]