/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6276677

quads/dubs general thread then

>Calculus professor wants all homework on paper, no mathlab
>mfw

good new semester feels thread?

the documentary on andrew wiles/fermat's last theorem is obligatory

>those with mechanical keyboards have the advantage

>>6247640

i lied about the identities. that's a different program

it has identities and shit for tons of stars.

plus you can make andromeda and the milky way collide and change the physics and shit i think.

haven't played in awhile. just buy it

>>6244487

we /pol/ now

>>6244329

muh genetics

I've been wondering if the OP ever came back to inform us about something.

I don't even know if he went.

>>6238124

and right

>>6238121

naw i was just straight evading.

metaphysics has no use when it comes to actual science.

this is why i hate philosophy. Especially when it's mixed with science. the end product is usually something false fueled by wishful thinking.

>>6238114

fuk u m8

go watch what the bleep do we know

feg

Why the fuck were they debating?

It's a physicist vs a philosopher.

The philosopher's interpretation is going to be (obviously) philosophical and just focus on the metaphysics, whereas krauss actually makes suggestions that pertain to physics.


They might as well have a debate on time too.

if you're going to continue studying after undergrad then i'd go with imperial.

>>6208302

it's the type of base.

produces an OH- (in an aqueous solution) therefor it's an arrhenius base.

strong bases are soluble in water and are completely dissociated, weak bases ionize just slightly.

This board is so slow that i don't get why homework threads aren't allowed.

I understand asking people to solve for them, but seeing that most of us are in uni we're just trying to understand the reasoning behind the answer.

/sci/ has helped me a few times understand the logic behind concepts and it helps me study the material better. I just don't see why this is a problem

>>6200886

naw man i wish.

I'm just a bit south on the other coast of florida but i can always get a view of the launchs. It's pretty cool despite being so far away

went to go take a picture of it but i had my macro lens on.

by the time i put on my other lens all there was left was the smoke trail ;_;

wait wasn't schrodinger's cat to represent the implications behind the copenhagen interpretation, thus leading to the many worlds interpretation to be the strongest candidate for the time being.

helium
cpap mask and tubing

>>6179818

ah see.

i didn't know i could just use the partial pressures and neglect the K value

>>6179731

lolwut

how does that apply?

I used that to find my Keq initially but i don't see how that can be used when i'm given pressure now. I'd still have to apply the K i found previously but with pressure being introduced it wouldn't give me the right answer

How does one go about calculating delta G in standard conditions given the individual pressure values of reactants and products?

The reaction doesn't say what type elements are involved and i found the Keq given a delta G in the previous question

>inb4 banned for homework, i'm studying for my test

I would just like to know what formula i'd apply for this