[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.10164091 [View]
File: 226 KB, 1156x684, TRINITY___Collage.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164091

>> No.10156359 [View]
File: 226 KB, 1156x684, TRINITY___Collage.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10156359

>> No.10123554 [View]
File: 226 KB, 1156x684, TRINITY___Collage.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10123554

If the Dedekind cut is the only rigorous definition of a real number as a cut in the real number line, then how were Riemann and them able to carry out rigorous analyses with non-rigorous numbers? How is the Riemann tensor, the Cauchy-Riemann equations, or the Riemann sphere when it is based on shit definitions of real numbers that even a kindergartner can see the guy is crank viXra viXra viXra?
>brontosaurus

>> No.10107133 [View]
File: 226 KB, 1156x684, TRINITY___Collage.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10107133

>>10106888
I often get the feeling the Bog nay-sayed my theory.

Navigation
View posts[-24][+24][+48][+96]