>>9537915
>The implication here is that epistemology doesn't make as much money as STEM, as though that is the objective inherent to learning about/discussing these things. It's as arbitrary a set of goalposts as how many pet parrots STEMfags have vs non-STEM. What does money have to do with this discussion? If it wasn't an entirely random thing to bring up you could argue that usury is superior to STEM because it makes more money, and that probably wouldn't fit in with your religious ideas about inherent value or 'worth'.
lol, no you idiot, philosophy majors being McDick's employees is just a meme from that xkcd edit.
Try thinking of some more straightforward explanations before reading way too deeply into a meme next time.