/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16069242
Yes. Never even started downloading. Restarted everything etc. I'm in incognito mode, maybe that's the culprit?

>>15944428
>Bill Gates has positively affected society.
>Uploading files in incognito mode is not allowed.
>The File field has been cleared.
Fuck nu4chan
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/16/books/review/the-bill-gates-problem-tim-schwab.html

>>15805692
This one I took in Incognito on my laptop so it's not a screencap but a picture of the laptop screen.

>>15780321
>Multiple gmails
>Throwaways
I bet you think incognito mode means no one sees what you are doing online too.
Don't want to derail anymore, but anything you do on any gmail account or chrome browser is tied to your personal IRL identity. This has been happening for years.

>>15680158
so what? blocked people can see your posts too, they just need to use another account or go incognito or whatever
blocking as a thing is retarded

>>15629853
>t.I dont name fag so when I say retarded shit I can go incognito in another thread and people there wont know I that retard from the other thread

@ing everyone to air your retardation should be a bannable offence.

>>15355303
No idea but it still triggers without incognito mode
Extensions ftw

pic related. I wasn't interested in getting lectured about nofap. I feel like it's healthy, fun, and free. I just wanted to know if there was an app that filters my search history and stuff. Something that leaves the useful content and gets rid of the unuseful content. I would like to be able to hand my phone, laptop, or desktop to someone else and porn doesn't show up in the search or history, but all of the other normal, useful stuff remains. Is there not an app for this?

I could have used incognito or something, but it's too late. Now all of the useful stuff is mixed with less than useful stuff.

thanks folks.

This is the "Grand Emblem of Royal Arch Masonry". In the centre is the Triple Tau, concealing the inverted "Fourth T". Royal Arch's most senior members do not know who wrote Shake-Speare,
or at least are sceptical of the established unchallenged position and not in the least bit disturbed at this kind of discussion. The secret is perhaps burred within a tiny order of maybe three men, sworn to secrecy upon joining. It has been kept for over four centuries. I can't see them making any public announcements. Work it out yourself, it's hidden in plain sight.

Francis Bacon's name appears in fairly blatant acrostics in the opening pages of the 1623 First Folio. Historians of the Rosicrucians also believe he was an important figure and there is evidence, not difficult to accept after you've digested this geometry, that the Rosicrucians, i.e. the early Masons, had the First Folio printed and did some Rosicrucian stuff on it. So what ?.
I do not know what if any editorial input to the works Bacon is responsible for. I suspect, without caring a massive amount, that he is purely being referenced as the leader of the Rosicrucian movement. Bacon and Dee are listed as prime influencers of Newton. Bacon had been publicly disgraced, much like De Vere ended his life, several years earlier. Dee ended his life with such ignominy we aren't 100% sure which year it was in. These three men are, in the view of many Masons, at least two of the first three Grand Masters of Freemasonry.

400 years ago this year the then Prince Charles made a truly insane and ultimately pointless expedition to Madrid, incognito, to pursue a Catholic woman who did not want the attentions of a Protestant. There was both delight and extreme opposition to the idea in England. At the end of the year, Shakespeare's First Folio would be published and the matter of the "Spanish Match" would be over. These events are very possibly connected.

You'll be getting some bollocks about Heminges and Condell instead.

>>15255963
That was a hoax but he's weirdly incognito right now while there's a hoax about his demise on

>>15149824
>Pay walled.
no, it's not pay-walled at all, you can download it freely
I just tried that to check it out, and I don't have access to any pay-wall
even tried it from an incognito browser
stop making things up
>You were happy to quote the conclusions you liked.
you're the one asking about how they define consciousness when they literally have an entire section where they define it
your inability to read is not my problem
>Why are you being such a dick and not quoting their definition of consciousness?
sure, I can do it if you absolutely want, but the way you asked "So how did they define it?" is rather crass when you could just read it yourself, you're the one being a dick
here's the relevant part of the section:
>Definition of consciousness
>Consciousness is a difficult topic, and its constructs and definition are much debated. Even so, considerable agreement is achieved when it is stripped to its fundamentals. Both we and the proponents of plant consciousness focus on the most basic type, called phenomenal or primary consciousness (Block 1995; Edelman et al. 2011; Feinberg and Mallatt 2016a, b; Calvo 2017; Mallatt and Feinberg 2020). Primary consciousness means having any type of experiences or feelings, no matter how faint or fleeting (Revonsuo 2006: p. 37). Such a basal type of consciousness was most succinctly characterized by Thomas Nagel (1974) as “something it is like to be” when he asked, “What is it like to be a bat?” It means having a subjective or first-person point of view, and what is sometimes called sentience (from Latin sententia, “feeling”).

>I want to classify other people I dislike as inhuman or lesser humans so I can kill them with no remorse

Nazis are bad at going incognito

>>14811552
>look up elon musk body pillow
>try to delete my search history in incognito mode
honestly considering eye bleach right about now.

This is a project to study the psychological profile and habits of great living mathematicians.
Here is a link to a preliminary document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1J4E4wc-e8BrlSaaukitB0JRleBN3pOnfFYaJY4udbZk/edit?usp=sharing
(make sure to open it in incognito mode if you don't want your profile to be seen). It is publicly available and in it we will document our progress. You can make suggestions to the document.
Many anons here have finished universities or are researchers who know and can contact many great living mathematicians. We will build a questionnaire and send it out to many such mathematicians, aggregate the responses and in this way improve human knowledge.
A first preliminary questions:
Besides the studies mentioned in Hadamard's book (see the document) have any similar studies been done by other people? Is the data publicly available?
We would like to make sure we aren't doing something that has already been done.
Second, discuss questions that you would want to include. Also discuss the questionnaire included in the document.

>>14629547
>Post studies, infograph, memes and videos that can help redpill normies.
>>Visit stat database
>https://www.altbase.net
>>Telegram channels that frequently posts stats
>https://t.me/datadistribution
>https://t.me/houseofwagner
>https://t.me/TruthGraphs
>>Thread collection. Mostly race realism related (highly recommend checking out)
>https://archive.is/Rakys
>>Debunking immigration studies
>https://archive.is/41ELP
>>Lots of sources with examples of anti whiteness
>https://archive.is/HtEnR
>>infographs (will keep adding more as the time goes)
>https://mega.nz/folder/bDpDgSyC#GNSXCHZHhKFA6ahelTzGFQ
>Use incognito mod before looking at google docs
>>HBD at lightspeed by Wehrkatzer (race realism, intelligence, hereditarianism)
>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-C9BHXj44a7MDHQH9WrWaVee9TCB-lKvlv36rnv-gQs/edit
>>Debate Notes Debunking Systemic Racism
>https://docs.google.com/document/d/14JPJ5XVS6bXIj3T22BglTgqIrkgGC1UY-FrGxJ2vVlY/edit?usp=drivesdk
>>4 Steps (100s of sources) Showing How Criminal Justice System’s Racial Bias Is Non-Existent or Negligible
>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1I2CiV8fGWVMFgt2enjysCmdOBhAxfb-ZgvcDXGFn9KE/edit
>>BLM is Wrong in 5 STEPS – For Public
>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ylDnGSk1kery15S1vKc3ydxYcvApy02JZ9mufWR88nc/edit
>>10 Studies Indicating No Police Racial Bias + Counterpoint Studies
>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kVlyqqLFT3mFlCc5pNM6iiqBcGLhX2r1V52VFm_ZGZE/edit
>>The Stanford Open Policing Project 2019 – How They Likely Misled the Public (a Rebuttal)
>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1O1X58wnmjifVygG1CNfPiL9Ra8l_Y3wGnU58Hxb58jo/edit
>>blogs
>Thealternativehypothesis.org
>Ideasanddata.wordpress.com
>https://www.unz.com/anepigone/
>https://the-boomer-tribune.medium.com
>https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/
>https://humanvarieties.org
not science or math

Post studies, infograph, memes and videos that can help redpill normies.

>Visit stat database
https://www.altbase.net

>Telegram channels that frequently posts stats
https://t.me/datadistribution
https://t.me/houseofwagner
https://t.me/TruthGraphs

>Thread collection. Mostly race realism related (highly recommend checking out)
https://archive.is/Rakys

>Debunking immigration studies
https://archive.is/41ELP

>Lots of sources with examples of anti whiteness
https://archive.is/HtEnR

>infographs (will keep adding more as the time goes)
https://mega.nz/folder/bDpDgSyC#GNSXCHZHhKFA6ahelTzGFQ

Use incognito mod before looking at google docs

>HBD at lightspeed by Wehrkatzer (race realism, intelligence, hereditarianism)
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-C9BHXj44a7MDHQH9WrWaVee9TCB-lKvlv36rnv-gQs/edit

>Debate Notes Debunking Systemic Racism
https://docs.google.com/document/d/14JPJ5XVS6bXIj3T22BglTgqIrkgGC1UY-FrGxJ2vVlY/edit?usp=drivesdk

>4 Steps (100s of sources) Showing How Criminal Justice System’s Racial Bias Is Non-Existent or Negligible
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1I2CiV8fGWVMFgt2enjysCmdOBhAxfb-ZgvcDXGFn9KE/edit

>BLM is Wrong in 5 STEPS – For Public
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ylDnGSk1kery15S1vKc3ydxYcvApy02JZ9mufWR88nc/edit

>10 Studies Indicating No Police Racial Bias + Counterpoint Studies
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kVlyqqLFT3mFlCc5pNM6iiqBcGLhX2r1V52VFm_ZGZE/edit

>The Stanford Open Policing Project 2019 – How They Likely Misled the Public (a Rebuttal)
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1O1X58wnmjifVygG1CNfPiL9Ra8l_Y3wGnU58Hxb58jo/edit

>blogs
Thealternativehypothesis.org
Ideasanddata.wordpress.com
https://www.unz.com/anepigone/
https://the-boomer-tribune.medium.com
https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/
https://humanvarieties.org

>>14591211
Why is the lawyer in incognito mode? Does the AI have enemies in the mob?
Naturally, this is a larp. Lemeoine must feel like he's a protagonist of some sorts so he's full on chugging his own kool-aid. Can't wait for live trials. I love a good circus.

>>12730249
you definitely can in incognito
but there is a time limit for deletion, I forget how long it is though

>>12730228
I would trust me but I use incognito, so I don't think I can...

>>12718022
>Plus if its mostly women you can look forward to most people being filtered out later on.
Nope, non-mathematically rigorous subfields of biology retain women pretty well. Actually most of my female professors were really kind and honestly great lecturers. I just don't like females in my class because seeing young fertile females my age that are riding chads left and right and might never even have kids is physically painful. It's all fun and games memeing about it on here but it hurts in real life, bros.

Also I already graduated and haven't had to deal with this for almost a year now. I was just craving attention last night so I wanted to make an incognito "complain about women" thread.

>>12686793
It's amazing how many people think that using a private tab somehow blocks trackers. I wonder how many people are out there plotting murders or looking for child pornography in an incognito tab on Chrome

>>12687329
Also, Incognito by David Eagleman is great pop-Neuro

>>12608551
>minecraft
>leveling guide
>reddit
>browsing spooky 4chins in incognito mode
is this what 145 iq looks like?

>>12602226
>incognito
looking up rocket porn?