/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16090372
>https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/resources-you-radiation-emitting-products/microwave-ovens
Lies from some dumbasses repeated by another grug.

>>16090377
They also scatter off your skin surface unless they're pulsed and create solitons, brillouinn precursors, or other shockwaves which propagate more deeply. IR stimulation can make water generate THz radiation in some controlled scenarios.

>>15494398
wow


Also - what mainstream media shows is 50 years behind the current state of neuroweapons. They can already pipe thoughts int you mind, manipulate dreams etc. Mi5 whistleblower and microwave specialist barrie trower said they can produce over 700 neurological symptoms using low power pulsed microwaves.

It is worth noting that although in one of my previous publications I stated that microwave cooking could be accelerated by elimination of the electron spin of the electrons associated with heating and that remains true, the other major force that inhibits resonance is the Coulomb repulsion of EM-associated electrons by electron cloud electrons. I now believe that the spin cancellation approach alone would only slightly accelerate cooking speed (perhaps 10%.)

However, if a magnetic field configured properly can push all of the orbiting electrons to one side of an electron cloud (even if momentarily) then during that period, any standard microwave radiation would heat plain water at ~40x the normal rate. Therefore, a Pulsed Soliton-Enhanced Microwave Oven design would be clearly superior, even to the RASA concept.

In a PS-EMO, a soliton wave is emitted every 10 microseconds with the help of an electromagnetic ring on the side of the microwave with the magnetron. The ring, while active, would uniform a steady stream of microwaves into a soliton which, when it interacts with the liquid to be heated, pushes all electrons to one side, exposing one half of all of the electron clouds to the maximal chance for a resonance event. Standard microwave energy would ride on the coattails of each soliton wave and heat water with extreme rapidity.

Due to the kinetic effects of solitons on metals, at least one side of such a microwave would need to be made of a non-ferromagnetic and non-paramagnetic metal.

The Real Reason Lipids Heat Faster in the Microwave AND Microwave Cooking Accelerated by Pulsed Solitons in Conjunction with Spin Attenuation Enabled by Multi-Mode Ring Electromagnet

According to: https://www.thekitchn.com/why-do-fatty-foods-seem-to-reheat-faster-in-the-microwave-226064

...Lipids heat faster because of reasons? I searched high and low and failed to find a logically consistent explanation of this phenomenon and the explanation at that link seems to be the mainstream pseudoscientific explanation of today.

Although it may not seem like the most important issue, I take it a little personally when I see scientific claims being made that couldn't possibly be true. The authors of the above article don't seem to understand the difference between heat and temperature and in an article the title of which suggests that lipids heat faster in the microwave, the body of the very same article contradicts the title and states that water "absorbs more microwaves."

Water does not "absorb more microwaves." If something is heated faster and any kid with a microwave can observe how fatty meats will start sizzling in three seconds can see that, why can't the scientific community?

To solve this riddle once and for all, I took a look at the factors that go in to determining the rate of heating by microwaves.

>>12526511
Pic related as in the Soviet LIDA? I'm not sure, I've never looked. It was patented in the Soviet Union but I also haven't dug up the patents or its exact specifications. According to Adey in:
[Symposium, New York Academy of Medicine] 1979 - SYMPOSIUM ON HEALTH ASPECTS OF NONIONIZING RADIATION
Page 122: Adey - NEUROPHYSIOLOGIC EFFECTS OF RADIOFREQUENCY AND MICROWAVE RADIATION
"In the context of these experiments, it should be mentioned that there is a medical therapeutic device, known as the LIDA, developed in the Soviet Union and patented in this country. It is designed for the treatment of psychoneurotic illness and emotional disorders. It emits pulsed radio signals up to one tenth of a second long at rates up to two per second, with a maximum generator output of 40 to 80 watts. The instrument can also generate pulsed light, sound, and heat, and the four stimulus modalities can be delivered separately or in any desired combination. Reports of clinical tests in the U.S.S.R. in juveniles and adults suffering from emotional disorders are said to have been favorable."

Another device:
Sudakov KV et al - HYPNOGENIC EFFECTS OF A MODULATED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD
"A study was made of the dynamics of behavioral and EEG changes in rats during prolonged exposure to a modulated electromagnetic field (40 MHz frequency, 50·Hz modulation frequency, 100-120 V/m field voltage [~2.5 - 3.8 mW/cm2]). It was found that exposure to a modulated electromagnetic field leads to appearance of phasic disturbances of conditioned alimentary and defense reactions, to the extent of a cataleptic state. These behavioral disturbances are due to a change in normal corticosubcortical correlations."

Obviously it could be used on populations without their knowledge.

>>12168361
Don't worry, the truth will prevail.

Artificial EMF is nothing like natural EMF anyway. Step 1 it fails, then we have a bombardment of microwave levels millions to billions times higher than natural microwave levels.

The prove will come out.

Like sunburns from UV, it happens over time. If you turn UV off and on quickly, you would not easily tell anything in your physiology.
I suppose it is like that, the microwave and general artificial EMF (ELF, LF) is a slow burner. I reckon, only by memory could you say; "that's weird, in this cabin in the mountains, I feel better at night than when at home, I sleep better" (when it's quiet to eliminate the factor of noise at home).

1. When you move in to urban areas, it is a gradient of increasing exposure.
2. Then you have the obvious effects that don't happen straight away. Like a sunburn.
This could be a big problem of the nature of 5G and artificial EMF, its noticeability due to those two factors.

Of course the invisible nature of microwave 'phone signal' never was going to help our side of the debate, but with those two factors I mentioned above, it becomes hell on Earth, with the mainstream then allowing this polarised pulsed EMF bombardment to persist.

I am holding onto the science, this is what I reckon could be making this debate one sided for now, especially regarding mainstream recognition.

When more studies come out with 5G and our physiology it could be grave news. At the moment we have hardly any studies in that area of millimeter waves and our biology.
(https://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/ good resource on up to date non-biased science on the matter).

Simply, caution and studies is really lacking for what is major bombardment of microwave radiation across our planet. You would want to make sure.

>>12163276
The interesting part is that after he reported a slight (but statistically insignificant) protective effect from the TDMA, Motorola rejected his findings, canceled future studies, and cut funding to his lab. Which closed shortly after. One explanation is they wanted a clean "no effect", period. A seemingly positive effect in one aspect and exposure condition, opened the door to a negative one in others. Anything other than "inert" would be a high risk long term strategy.
https://microwavenews.com/news-center/ross-adey
"Adey prompted another stir when his studies of long-term exposure to cell phone radiation pointed to what appeared to be a protective effect —that is, exposed mice developed fewer tumors. Motorola, which paid for Adey’s experiments, repudiated this finding and soon afterwards stopped supporting his lab. It closed down a short time later. In an interview with Fortune magazine in October 2000, Adey urged that research continue: “There is a big task ahead to define what the lowest level of safe exposure could be,” he said, predicting that, “Wherever we go we will be immersed in a sea of low-level pulsed microwave signals.”"
March, 1993 - DO CELLULAR PHONES CAUSE CANCER? One researcher for Motorola wouldn't use them more than 30 minutes a day. But there's an appalling lack of convincing research on risks from electromagnetic fields.
https://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1993/03/08/77585/index.htm

One thing that comes to mind is that exposure to some signals may be more apt to simply kill cells, rather than initiating or aiding in the tumor development process. Otherwise they may cause a low-grade stress response (hormesis) without interfering with DNA repair systems in a particular species.

>>12163274
Hardell and Carlberg 2015 - Increasing Rates of Brain Tumours in the Swedish National Inpatient Register and the Causes of Death Register
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4410216/
Ahlbom et al 2015 - Comments on Hardell and Carlberg Increasing Rates of Brain Tumors in the Swedish National Inpatient Register and the Causes of Death Register
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4586697/
Hardell and carlberg 2015 - Response to Ahlbom et al. Comments on Hardell and Carlberg Increasing Rates of Brian Tumors in the Swedish National Inpatient Register and the Causes of Death Register
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4586698/

Two notable studies were done by Adey et al on chronic exposure to FM (Frequency Modulated / Analogue) phone signals, and TDMA signal schemes (used in 2G, digital/pulsed). They used a chemical tumor promoter model to see if there was any difference in tumor rate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time-division_multiple_access
Adey 1999 - Spontaneous and Nitrosourea-Induced Primary Tumors of the Central Nervous System in Fischer 344 Rats Chronically Exposed to 836 MHz Modulated Microwaves
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10453090
Adey 2000 - Spontaneous and Nitrosourea-induced Primary Tumors of the Central Nervous System in Fischer 344 Rats Exposed to Frequency-modulated Microwave Fields
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10766172

>>12025590
-See also "LIDA", a USSR made psychotronic acquired by the CIA through a Canadian front and delivered to WR Adey.
[m][Symposium, New York Academy of Medicine] 1979 - SYMPOSIUM ON HEALTH ASPECTS OF NONIONIZING RADIATION
Page 122: Adey - NEUROPHYSIOLOGIC EFFECTS OF RADIOFREQUENCY AND MICROWAVE RADIATION
"In the context of these experiments, it should be mentioned that there is a medical therapeutic device, known as the LIDA, developed in the Soviet Union and patented in this country. It is designed for the treatment of psychoneurotic illness and emotional disorders. It emits pulsed radio signals up to one tenth of a second long at rates up to two per second, with a maximum generator output of 40 to 80 watts. The instrument can also generate pulsed light, sound, and heat, and the four stimulus modalities can be delivered separately or in any desired combination. Reports of clinical tests in the U.S.S.R. in juveniles and adults suffering from emotional disorders are said to have been favorable."

>>11771423

A CNN report from 1985.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iPKb5VymeA

[m][Symposium, New York Academy of Medicine] 1979 - SYMPOSIUM ON HEALTH ASPECTS OF NONIONIZING RADIATION
Page 122: Adey - NEUROPHYSIOLOGIC EFFECTS OF RADIOFREQUENCY AND MICROWAVE RADIATION
"In the context of these experiments, it should be mentioned that there is a medical therapeutic device, known as the LIDA, developed in the Soviet Union and patented in this country. It is designed for the treatment of psychoneurotic illness and emotional disorders. It emits pulsed radio signals up to one tenth of a second long at rates up to two per second, with a maximum generator output of 40 to 80 watts. The instrument can also generate pulsed light, sound, and heat, and the four stimulus modalities can be delivered separately or in any desired combination. Reports of clinical tests in the U.S.S.R. in juveniles and adults suffering from emotional disorders are said to have been favorable."

>>11696857
Yep.

[Symposium, New York Academy of Medicine] 1979 - SYMPOSIUM ON HEALTH ASPECTS OF NONIONIZING RADIATION
Page 122: Adey - NEUROPHYSIOLOGIC EFFECTS OF RADIOFREQUENCY AND MICROWAVE RADIATION
"In the context of these experiments, it should be mentioned that there is a medical therapeutic device, known as the LIDA, developed in the Soviet Union and patented in this country. It is designed for the treatment of psychoneurotic illness and emotional disorders. It emits pulsed radio signals up to one tenth of a second long at rates up to two per second, with a maximum generator output of 40 to 80 watts. The instrument can also generate pulsed light, sound, and heat, and the four stimulus modalities can be delivered separately or in any desired combination. Reports of clinical tests in the U.S.S.R. in juveniles and adults suffering from emotional disorders are said to have been favorable."

https://www.mediafire.com/folder/dj875cd10yb72/EMF
See the top text document, the "Research and Mechanisms" part of the 5G section should convey the gist of the topic.

Discuss.

To start off. Pic related (LIDA) was a device developed in the Soviet Union. As the story goes, it was acquired by a CIA front in Canada, then sent down to California where it was evaluated by WR Adey, a licensed MD who taught anatomy, did surgical and electrical brain research, and was an elected fellow of IEEE for his work on phased array radar. He tested it and found it found it worked as described. It's possible a version of LIDA was used in Korea for hypnotic suggestion.

[m][Symposium, New York Academy of Medicine] 1979 - SYMPOSIUM ON HEALTH ASPECTS OF NONIONIZING RADIATION
Page 122: Adey - NEUROPHYSIOLOGIC EFFECTS OF RADIOFREQUENCY AND MICROWAVE RADIATION
"In the context of these experiments, it should be mentioned that there is a medical therapeutic device, known as the LIDA, developed in the Soviet Union and patented in this country. It is designed for the treatment of psychoneurotic illness and emotional disorders. It emits pulsed radio signals up to one tenth of a second long at rates up to two per second, with a maximum generator output of 40 to 80 watts. The instrument can also generate pulsed light, sound, and heat, and the four stimulus modalities can be delivered separately or in any desired combination. Reports of clinical tests in the U.S.S.R. in juveniles and adults suffering from emotional disorders are said to have been favorable."

>but it's non-ionizing radiation

Adverse health effects of 5G mobile networking technology under real-life conditions
>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31991167
>Identifies wide-spectrum of adverse health effects of non-ionizing non-visible radiation
>• Most laboratory experiments were not designed to identify the more severe adverse effects reflective of real-life conditions
>• Many experiments do not include the real-life pulsing and modulation of the carrier signal
>• Vast majority of experiments do not account for synergistic adverse effects of other toxic stimuli with wireless radiation
>• 5G mobile networking technology will affect not only the skin and eyes, but will have adverse systemic effects as well
>This article identifies adverse effects of non-ionizing non-visible radiation (hereafter called wireless radiation) reported in the premier biomedical literature.

Appeals that matter or not on a moratorium on the deployment of the fifth generation, 5G, for microwave radiation
>https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/mco.2020.1984/download
>Radiofrequency (RF) radiation in the frequency range of 30 kHz‑300 GHz is classified as a ‘possible’ human carcinogen, Group 2B, by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) since 2011. The evidence has since then been strengthened by further research; thus, RF radiation may now be classified as a human carcinogen

Spatial and Time Averaging Restrictions Within the Electromagnetic Exposure Safety Framework in the Frequency Range Above 6GHz
>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31885092
>In this study, we show that the application of the current and proposed limits for pulsed fields can lead to a temperature increase of 10°C for short pulses and frequencies between 6 and 30GHz.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLVIbPtNrVo

WAKE UP

>>11463274
There really are.

-See also "LIDA", a USSR made psychotronic acquired by the CIA through a Canadian front and delivered to WR Adey.
[m][Symposium, New York Academy of Medicine] 1979 - SYMPOSIUM ON HEALTH ASPECTS OF NONIONIZING RADIATION
Page 122: Adey - NEUROPHYSIOLOGIC EFFECTS OF RADIOFREQUENCY AND MICROWAVE RADIATION
"In the context of these experiments, it should be mentioned that there is a medical therapeutic device, known as the LIDA, developed in the Soviet Union and patented in this country. It is designed for the treatment of psychoneurotic illness and emotional disorders. It emits pulsed radio signals up to one tenth of a second long at rates up to two per second, with a maximum generator output of 40 to 80 watts. The instrument can also generate pulsed light, sound, and heat, and the four stimulus modalities can be delivered separately or in any desired combination. Reports of clinical tests in the U.S.S.R. in juveniles and adults suffering from emotional disorders are said to have been favorable."

>>11352091
Look up Bawin and Adey's Ca2+ efflux experiments, UCLA 1970's. Later replicated by Carl Blackman et al. It was windowed to certain modulation (peaking at 16Hz), but there were multiple ranges where this curve occurred. You may be right about these other pulsed frequencies having similar banding curves. Refer to the EHS/Microwave Sickness section for more on that. Interesting thought, hadn't considered it in quite that way. Pulse characteristics seem to be important here as well.

>>11187130
>it shows an advanced US govt. weapons lab considering the physics of pulsed microwave/cell phone radiation. QED
It shows one quack with a confirmed psychosomatic disorder speculating about his disorder with no actual data. The lab has nothing to do with it and this narrative you've invented illustrates your lose grip on reality. Enjoy your mental illness, I'm out.

>>11187074

it shows an advanced US govt. weapons lab considering the physics of pulsed microwave/cell phone radiation. QED

>Microwave hearing is known effect but can't explain these events since it has thermal effects.

wrong. they're not necessarily mutually exclusive, and we don't know what all the effects of the cuba attack were. there might have been some thermal effects in addition to the others. that said, Dr. Bruno raised microwave hearing as an example of what pulsed microwaves can do, not necessarily concomitant with an attack vector. you're confusing 2 different things.

>William Bruno is not "working at the federal weapons research lab at Los Alamos"

he was at the time. what I said is accurate and correct. when he wrote the paper he was working at Los Alamos, hence "by a biophysics PhD working at the federal weapons research lab at Los Alamos"

and he still is effectively working there, see the last part of that post;

>Established in 2006, the New Mexico Consortium (NMC) partners with Los Alamos National Laboratory in order to develop, implement and continually improve models that encourage and support collaborative research across its partner institutions

>and there is no indication Los Alamos even knows about it.

moron, what do you think he does for a living? research and write papers. that's his job. that was his job at Los Alamos. That's why he put "Theoretical Biology & Biophysics Los Alamos National Laboratory " at the top of the paper.

lying shit

>>11187059
>that part was the demonstrate microwaves could perform the work "when exposed to strong, but non-thermal, pulsed microwaves."
They are only "non-thermal" in the sense that what they are being exposed to has no water to heat up in the first place. Your arhiment is self-contradictory. You say these effects on humans can be explained by microwaves because microwaves can have non-thermal effects on non-humans.

>no it wasn't. you claimed optical tweezers couldn't use microwaves.
No I claimed the optical tweezer effect doesn't work with microwaves. This is because microwaves have thermal effects that can interfere with its operation.

>I showed you they can, proving you wrong.
You proved your own argument wrong by showing that microwaves have a thermal effect when attempting to use them as optical tweezers. You confused non-thermal effects on paper and foil with microwaves in general having non-thermal effects on biological material, a mistake only a complete novice would make. It's time for you to stop pretending like you have a clue what you're talking about, you're not fooling anyone.

>non-thermal microwave damage to ultrastructure has been reported [Webber et al., 1980]
Webber says that the observed effect is different from just heating the cells, not that the microwaves have no thermal effects. They do, since the cells have water.

>cellphone signals damaging the blood-brain barrier (e.g., Salford et al. 2003).
Due to thermal effects:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/20550949/?i=6&from=/18821198/related
>Exposure to levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMF) that increase brain temperature by more than 1 °C can reversibly increase the permeability of the BBB for macromolecules. The balance of experimental evidence does not support an effect of ‘non-thermal’ radiofrequency fields with microwave and mobile phone frequencies on BBB permeability.

>moving/heating cells is not the attack vector
You can't avoid the thermal effects.

>>11187021

>foil or paper crumpling is not an auditory sensation

that part was the demonstrate microwaves could perform the work "when exposed to strong, but non-thermal, pulsed microwaves."

>That's exactly the point

no it wasn't. you claimed optical tweezers couldn't use microwaves. I showed you they can, proving you wrong.

>if you tried to get these effects in someone's brain you'd burn them to a crisp.

nope, again;

>non-thermal microwave damage to ultrastructure has been reported [Webber et al., 1980], and there are many reports of cellphone signals damaging the blood-brain barrier (e.g., Salford et al. 2003).
-arxiv link

also see>>11186770

moving/heating cells is not the attack vector

try again

>>11186926
>cellphone radiation is not deliberately pulsed to be bioeffective or biodestructive. microwaves can cause auditory sensations, that's also in the arxiv link and well established in the field.
>>Another example of how an optical tweezer-like effect might come about is microwave hearing. Sharp et al. [1974] proposed photon pressure as the mechanism for this well established effect, and also for the observation that objects like crumpled foil or paper emit sound when exposed to strong, but non-thermal, pulsed microwaves.
This is really funny, foil or paper crumpling is not an auditory sensation, it's actual noise! You're reading comprehension is atrocious.

>wrong again
>>Although the microwave tweezer can't drag around cells (a water-filled cell would heat up and die,)
That's exactly the point, do you not realize the cells in your brain have water? Now we've gone full circle back to my original point, which is that if you tried to get these effects in someone's brain you'd burn them to a crisp.

>the posts clearly demonstrate the validity of my argument.
They don't. Present an actual argument.

>>11186834
>Does cellphone radiation cause auditory sensations? No.

cellphone radiation is not deliberately pulsed to be bioeffective or biodestructive. microwaves can cause auditory sensations, that's also in the arxiv link and well established in the field.

>Another example of how an optical tweezer-like effect might come about is microwave hearing. Sharp et al. [1974] proposed photon pressure as the mechanism for this well established effect, and also for the observation that objects like crumpled foil or paper emit sound when exposed to strong, but non-thermal, pulsed microwaves.

> and the optical tweezer effect doesn't even work at microwave frequencies

wrong again

>Although the microwave tweezer can't drag around cells (a water-filled cell would heat up and die,) it should be able to manipulate other microsized objects....Prather and his colleagues are now constructing a larger lens, with an array of microwave beams to smoothly move the particles longer distances.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2006/03/perfect-lens-makes-perfect-tweezers

>This makes it possible to hold, move or rotate individual particles inside a sample — even if they cannot be touched directly. The tailor-made light beam becomes a universal remote control for everything small. Microwave experiments have already demonstrated that the method works. The new optical tweezer technology has now been presented in the journal Nature Photonics.
https://scitechdaily.com/revolutionary-optical-tweezers-manipulate-atoms-molecules-and-living-cells-like-tractor-beams

>an avalanche of posts with no coherent argument

the posts clearly demonstrate the validity of my argument. successful communication involves signal and reception. your receptive ability is poor.

>>11186816
>I don't know what you mean by "similar."

nothing recent involving sounds and sensations in the head.

>It has.

[citation needed]

not just any mass hysteria, something with symptoms similar to this involving dozens of people in the same location

>Of course mass hysteria is consistent

many of these people reported sensations coming from a specific direction. that's not something you'd expect due to hysteria. it *is* something you'd expect from a directed MW signal

>The sound was recorded and determined to be a jungle cricket.

one theory (among many) by 2 people. that wouldn't explain sounds like "grinding metal," "piercing squeals" or "pressurelike or vibratory sensory stimuli". it wouldn't explain why the symptoms were so acute even indoors. it wouldn't explain why nobody has ever had a similar problem with this cricket before - is this a new cricket? no it's not. it doesn't explain why only americans in a hostile country recently reoccupied by our chief geopolitical adversary were the only ones affected, and not anybody else on cuba or any other caribbean island (altho canadians, a U.S./5 eyes/NATO/etc. ally reported effects later). in other words, it's a nonsense cover story ~"swamp gas"

>There is no evidence of microwave technology being developed to harm people's brains. You're being purposefully vague. Try arguing honestly.

moron, you can't see what's right in front of your face.

the arxiv link in the OP is by a biophysics PhD working at the federal weapons research lab at Los Alamos, the same outfit that developed the atomic bomb, warning of the dangers of microwave radiation, specifically when pulsed (ie. if a cell signal were reshaped to be maximally biodestructive, aka weaponized).

>>11185169
It is.

>>11185170
>mass hysteria is more common among common people, not U.S. diplomats, many of whom are CIA using diplomatic cover.
Please explain how you calculated this. The amount of "common people" is much larger than the amount of US diplomats in hostile countries, and the rate of mass hysteria in various populations is not published in the scientific literature as far as I can see.

Not to mention that if you want to argue from probability, then you would need to compare the probabily that this is mass hysteria to the probability of diplomats being attacked by microwaves. Is that "common?"

Then there's the small problem that in order for microwaves to produce the claimed effects, it would have to have killed them: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/scientists-and-doctors-zap-theory-that-microwave-weapon-injured-cuba-diplomats/2018/09/06/aa51dcd0-b142-11e8-9a6a-565d92a3585d_story.html

>“These individuals appeared to have sustained injury to widespread brain networks without an associated history of head trauma.”
Appearance of injury without physical trauma, that's exactly what psychosomatic illness is. The stupidity of pulling a quote like this out of context from the article when anyone can read the sentences around it is pretty impressive.

>Dr. Bruno (Los Alamos PhD cited in the OP) makes clear the attack vector of pulsed microwaves is bioelectric, not thermal)
The paper says nothing about the Frey effect, which is observed to have thermal effects. Clearly you have no clue what you're talking about and are just connecting things that appear naively similar.

>>11185172
Mass hysteria appears to be the answer since its the only one consistent with all the evidence and you are unable to present an argument against it besides the laughable and invalid claims that "diplomats can't have mass hysteria" and "mass hysteria is like weather balloons." Pathetic.

I TOLD YOU

>Reported facts appear consistent with pulsed RF/MW as the source of injury in Cuba diplomats.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/58fa27103e00bed09c8eac2c/t/5b7f95930e2e7262c9be0455/1535088022263/Cuba+2018-08-23c+-NEJM.pdf

related;

>microwave energy at cell phone frequencies penetrates deeply into tissue

>microwaves in the 1-10 GHz frequency range most efficiently do work inside the brain, and current digital pulse modulation schemes makes use of frequencies that, if demodulated, are also used by neurons.
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1104/1104.5008.pdf

>The autonomic nervous system is affected by the microwaves of the centimeter wave length band...Very small dosages produce analgesic effects; however, very large dosages are fatal.
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/7521095727.pdf