/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16152331
Who are you quoting? Nobody said this.

>>16148533
Who are you quoting?

>>16137916
Who are you quoting?

>>16136970
Who are you quoting?

>>16131828
What? Did you just have a mental breakdown? Who are you quoting?
Anyway I have built up a tolerance to walls by banging my head against small walls and slowly working up to larger ones over time.

>>16122360
Who are you quoting?

>>16096116
who are you quoting ? Im just curious

>>16087446
Who are you quoting?

>>16074571
Who are you quoting?

>>16077304
>"Going to the moon is an enormous challenge, we're a long way off from ever doing it
Who are you quoting?

>>16059197
>Who are you
>>quoting
>?
Rust from True Detective Season 1. The character is just bummed out and not everything he says is meant to be gospel

>>16057530
Who are you
>quoting
?
Anyway, I don't agree with any of that. None of it can be justified, rationally or empirically. There are atoms, so what? Of course everything is made of something. So we looked and saw a little of what we're made of. We understand it mathematically to a limited extent. What does that tell us about the nature of consciousness or our being? Nothing.

>>16058540
who are you quoting

>>16052631
Who are you quoting?

>>16052631
Who are you quoting?

>>16035027
>>IF I CAN'T MEASURE IT, IT DOESN'T EXIST!!!
who are you quoting?

>>16034068
Who are you quoting?

>>16015246
so its either not infinite, or the stars have not existed forever, or both
well done, who are you quoting though?

>>16008036
Who are you quoting?

>>16001889
Who are you quoting?

>>16001081
Why are you conflating Christianity with Roman Catholicism? Perhaps you should study things you criticize because to do otherwise is ignorance and folly, and you'll only win over others as ignorant as you. The number of Christians tortured and murdered by that pretender cult... With your knowledge of history, I bet you think the American Revolutionary War had more to do with tea or taxation than banking and monetary policies. I wonder if you even know what happened in 1913.

>>16001151
Who are you quoting, schizo? You can look at pic related if your brain and attention span is really so fried from mommy and daddy giving you a smartphone and tablet from a young age since they didn't love you enough to want to raise you themselves. :-)

>>15990658
>we can't return cause they lost the tech and all the engineers working on it are old vegetables!
Who are you quoting

>We have had no reason to go back!
Quite right. Why go back to the moon? It's laughably useless compared to all the other cool shit we can do by now. We've sent probes to asteroids and shit.

It's like carrying a lasgun while crying about how no one knows how to do swordfights anymore.

>moonies
Explain how you can point a laser at the moon and receive a return signal.

>>15985259
Who are you quoting? Read the pdf I posted here
>>15985226
Engage with its content instead of the identity of who published it. It demonstrates serious problems with the surface station temperature sensing network across large swathes of the continental USA. We should fix that. But because the "wrong person" is talking about the problem, you stick your fingers in you ears and shout LALALALALA CAN'T HEAR YOU DOESN'T COUNT.
It's petulant and childish.

>>15974453
Who are you quoting?