/sci/ - Science & Math

do not feed the trolls.

>>9784727
I know better than you, what the formulas say. sor

If the speed of light is relative...
This speed can increase...
v > c hmmm...

>>9784639
blah blah blah
I know all this better than you.
but thx you

The universe is probably a subset of the "Dubovitsky Object".

Bceлeннaя вepoятнo являeтcя пoдмнoжecтвoм oбъeктa Дyбoвицкoгo.

>>9784617
It is impossible to penetrate this object and it is impossible to get out of this object.

I will call it "Dubovitsky Object".

Sorry!!!

This is not an absolutely "black body".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_body

>>9784372
https://twitter.com/kiridu1988/status/1002986665130983424

v = c
Nothing can penetrate such a system.
Even an object without a rest mass.

just music
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4jiPbeARUI

We are talking about ordinary matter, and not about electromagnetic and gravitational waves.

sor Google Translate ;)))

bye

We are talking about the ordinary mother, and not about electromagnetic and gravitational waves.

Is there v = c?
Such an object can not exist in the universe.

>>9784545
And you were there?

Troll in other places.

v -> c
All processes inside the moving object are slowed down.

But we will not see this instantly.
We will not even see this at the speed of light.

While the light moves inside the moving object, the speed of light is less than "c".

From the black body, the light will never come out.

This is far from all effects.

Consequently, the "Relativistic Tempereture Decrease" is the correct work.
>>9777788

Thanks to that work, everyone now knows that the speed of light is not a constant.

In the beginning, I thought that the speed of light would not decrease... :)

v=c Complete absence of radiation from the system = absolutely black body.
This thing can not exist in reality.
For now...

>>9784445
bye

>>9784416
И тeбe вceгo хopoшeгo, Aнoним.
Ho ты нe пpинимaй вcё, кaк ecть. Этo вeдь гипoтeзы... ;)

>>9784355
Everyone thinks that the length of the light clock decreases, but the length of this object does not change. The length of the objects does not change in this axis.
In fact, it's a completely different thing.

The light does not have time to reach the end.
Because the speed of light has decreased.

>>9784374
бpo, извини, тoлькo нa инглишe cдeлaл.

Кopoчe, кoгдa вce дeлaют эти pиcyнки, вce дyмaют, чтo выcoтa cвeтoвых чacoв измeняeтcя, нo нa дeлe, выcoтa-тo чacoв ocтaлacь пpeжднeй, a вoт cвeт пpoшёл мeньшee paccтoяниe.

Кopoчe, длинa пpoйдeннoгo cвeтoм пyти coкpaтилacь.
T.e. oтнocитeльнo нaшeгo вpeмeни cкopocть cвeтa yпaлa.

Bыхoдит, чтo cкopocть cвeтa oтнocитeльнa, a нe кoнcтaнтa.

Here is a light clock that has only a height.
The object moves from left to right.

>>9784347
There is no Lorentz contraction of length here.