/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11907026
Do photons exist? When I wave my hand you can see the wave. I am the existence causing the wave. When I stop, the wave disappears. That's because the wave didn't exist. When a photon stops waving, it disappears. Photons do not exist.

I'm from /x/. I don't want to bother you guys if you're busy building the historical model of imaginary-symbolic scientific reason. But I do think there's room for truth in science, which is why I'm here.

>>11906151
Divination is not synchronicity, merely a function of intuition. Synchronicity cannot occur under objective causal contracts, such as intuited knowledge of the future, as the divine does not work within the mortal and profane.

>>11906342
Coincidence is just an acausal juncture of meaning unfathomable to the individual.

>The issue is that you can't measure a phenomenon without interfering with it, and this becomes a non-negligible problem at the quantum level.
That's exactly the point I was making above. That's why I don't do /sci/, the vast majority is restricted to the Imaginary-Symbolic in complete neglect The Real. But that is due to scientific subjectivities with an infantile dependence upon symbolic evidence. Pop-scientists, you know? I'm clearly jaded. I'm willing to be vulnerable and intimate in order to share understanding, and have been hurt enough to cause resentment. "Show me evidence. Prove it." It's called reason, bitch. Logos. Nous. Not just sense, but good sense. Not just eyes and ears, but eyes which can see and ears which can hear. Evidence of God? EVERYWHERE. FUCKING LOOK AROUND.

I know the people I'm bitching about actually have nothing to do with science. They're just scientific subjectivities and trapped within it's historical framework, having no actual understanding of it. Thanks for helping me get that out.

>>11906642
Paranormal refers to a branch of normalcy, though I do consider that distinction to be unnecessary.

>>11906646
In my experience concepts like God, magic, miracles, demons, mysticism, etc. all fit perfectly in a naturalist framework.

While I'm here, what does /sci/ think of Alfred North Whitehead?

>>10504039
I took on.destitution and poverty for the sake of all God's creation, till the ego in service-to-self died and was reborn in service-to-others. Love and compassion is all I exist for. I take none of my person seriously, only my work.

>>10502798
Due to reckless Kundalini use I ended up with Atypical Trigeminal Neuralgia for about two months. Fucking FACE MIGRAINE. Always start shaking when I think about it.

>>10505079
This.

Life mere is. It has no beginning or end.

>>10503061
>modern dating problems?
What problems? Just romance a woman, the only natural role for them is Goddess. Every man knows that.

>>10502060
>But who are the people on this planet who truly suffer?
1. Thlids
2. C1 Tetraplegics

I'M CRAZY AND I'M PROUD

Schizoid here, pretty much the least likely condition to ever seek help. I spent years homeless, and I'll never serve society beyond the practices of a mystic or priest. While medication would have eased my suffering, I needed that suffering! I needed to find dispassion and denial of the will-to-life. It's part of developing into a full human being, of actually partaking in nature's excellence instead of being stunted in the womb of Maya's empty warmth like most of humanity.

Not that anyone should be denied the compassion and comfort of that womb, as many are indeed in need. Same as no one should be denied the suffering they desire or need.
https://youtu.be/LEiMkG5p2-M

Well yeah, getting laid gets you laid. There's no single aspect to it, it's an intimate intertwining of natures and complexities as they experience each other to an infinite depth.

>>10501888
>The real adherence to our nature is having a family and a loving partner.
Real adherence to the Oedipus complex, you mean.

>>10502009
Using another's animal body as a fleshlight is a far cry from what a sexual experience can be, it's a bit tragic if that's what you consider getting "laid" to be.

>>10501597
So a stranger off the street telling you how nice your cock is has the same merit as your girlfriend saying it?

Either way, I desire to provide experience, not mere intellectualizations devoid of higher meaning. I can only exist through communicating my heart, not through the ego. I care for me, and I care deeply about you.

>>10500761
The "big bang" was the moment that God's undivided white causal light, which is conscious and all things, acquired polarity. There is only one thing, which at that moment attained two states: still light and motional light.

https://youtu.be/m0veVT65TT4

>>10501169
>You argument is that Brahman is asexual
Undifferentiated, not asexual.

>a person cannot ever be in that state until after death cause they are limited by their bodies
A person can never be in that state as they define themselves as a person. It is not the person who is Brahman, it is the self. You speak with the Ego Individuality, not the self. You speak as the Ego Personality, which must be mastered and slain.

>"above" everyone
I'm as low as the lowest, as they are me and their suffering mine.

The rest of your attempt at cruelty and coping is not of value to address. I suggest you find God, compassion and love somewhere in your life.

Pathological. It's been deeply ingrained in them that Pandora's Box must never be opened. Governmentality and rigorous sanity are maintained by a flock mentality, instantly punishing anyone who wont bow down to Oedipus.

The world hates disciples.

>>10501064
Schizophrenia is a function of production which produces, it has nothing to do with illness and can be observed in many aspects of nature and society.

>>10500772
Physically male. My physical body does not define my features, which includes my physical body, the infinite void.and the cosmos itself.

>>10501043
Brahman is light /love itself, intelligent infinity, the core of all creation, undifferentiated and limitless. If you think otherwise, you are mistaken. Your discontent and objection is not laughable, it's a tragic display. I will pray for you.

>>10500743
I am all things, as there is only one thing, which is light/love. All else is identity and distinction of that limitless light, merely illusion. You have the free will to see things as they are or how you'd like. It's still false distinction, seeing things as they are implies one could see how they are nor, already creating a function of duality which distorts truth.

>>10500689
I may be schizophrenic, but I'm not mentally ill.

>>10500701
I acknowledge hormonal difference somewhere above, they play a role in behavior (though not necessarily identity).

>>10500577
Influenced, not dictated.

>>10500707
How do genes determine what we phantasize and experience?

>>10500702
Sexually dimorphic, but only cognitively dimorphic pre-individuation. While that's the state of the vast majority of humanity, making this nearly irrelevant, a fully formed self(Brahman) will be undifferentiated cognitively.

>>10500315
Individual existence is a misconception and illusion. I'm already every real girl, so are you.

>>10498665
>Is it wrong to say playing with trucks, being very curious with mechanical things and not interested in people is a masculine trait?
Yang structures. Males, men and masculinity are sublimations of this. In human behavior I'd best describe this as instrumentality and assertiveness. Aspects of the land on which we walk and food which we eat.

Yin flows. Females, women and femininity are sublimations of this. In human behavior I'd best describe it as nurturing and emotional-understanding/warmth. Aspects of the sea in which we swim and water which we drink.

Instrumentality without nurturing is something like objectification, assertiveness without emotional-understanding is something like abuse. But what is it to nurture instrumentality? To be curious, to learn, to think before acting. Assertiveness with emotional-understanding? To be respectful, to communicate effectively, to know and address the things which affects us.

Every human is him and her. It's fine to understand there are trends and relations, but people are far more than the unchosen circumstances dictated at their conception and should not be repressed into that role.

>>10498665
>How about your gender isn’t decided by what you claim to be but by how you interact with the world?
That is how gender is determined. Humans desire to identify and catalog people as quickly as possible. Of course, simply stating the gender you identify as to another is interacting with the world thus an aspect of how gender is determined.

.>>10499517
I love you and God loves you.

>>10499578
Whatever keeps you OK. I'm aware some depths of understanding are very cathexing.

>>10499746
Do you often feel under attack? I mean, consider my contributions here. It's pure parrhesia, absolute honesty. Yet I'm quite easily criticized and dismissed by scientific discourse, which I'm as receptive to as everything else. Nothing is to be ignored, but neither physical nor psychic reality need cancel each other out. Cartesian knowledge can exist ambivalently along with spirit and soul.

>More importantly, the leftist hates science and rationality because they classify certain beliefs as true (i.e., successful, superior) and other beliefs as false (i.e., successful, superior)
This is.. very hypocritical, in consideration of the opinions often stated on this board about spirituality and religion. But yes, the arrogance of man thinking something like truth is available to them is fairly laughable in both cases.

>>10500098
Beautifully written.

Consciousness is pervasive. When the mind is completely still it's speed is known, and together with consciousness they are everywhere. A synthases of actual object and eternal object, the imminent nature of only God itself.

>>10498410
Light doesn't have any colors, it has frequencies. Colors are symbols representing certain ranges and combinations of these frequencies, they don't exist externally.

>>10499660
/x/ welcomes it as well. Consciousness is an occult matter.