/sci/ - Science & Math

i like how the atheists make creationism seem simple

>>2638122
Any reason why? How does it harm the country?

Political Science here. How can the Government fund a war, but not feed the poor? Surely they have enough resource to provide food to their own people.

It would be impossible. In the sense your that you're using however, it would be intolerable. Life would become pointless. Remember, most of the universe you will never physically explore. The question would be better phrased as, "in a Godless world." Without God, all change relies on the Government. With God, people have something to turn to, and can gain equal power to speak their mind and make their own decisions. A Godless world, would be okay, if Satan didn't exist. However, Satan does exist, it just has formality veiled on top. Its funny how quickly people forget that they're economic slaves, and if money didn't exist they wouldn't have to work a pointless 9-5; and if civilization didn't exist they would be in the harmony of nature, experiencing the true wonders of life.

Godless universe:
1. Okay if no Government.
2. Not okay if Government.

(Only in the sense you're using it thought. A Godless universe is impossible.)

I like that. That's what G-d said, maybe. Why G-d said it, would be best explained as, "For G-d's love for us,".

Thanks for the easy battle people. Another win to add to my spree. What's that now? Around 1000 in a row, probably, give or take a few. Off to another thread I go. You guys may remain and.. sort of.. dribble at each other.

>>2636998
>a why question
>followed swiftly by "I don't know"

At least you're getting the point now.

Brave in the real world. Coward in 'reality'.

Brave is the best way to go either way, just you're not likely to survive in your current vessel being brave in 'reality.

>>2636961
Again, irrelevant. You've just used complexity to try and make a meaningful post. Your attempt failed, it didn't explain the "Why?", it used the "What?" to find a way around the "Why?" by using a combination of other "Whats?"

You're a fool. Seriously, you keep making the same error.

I guess that settles it then, no-one has provided a valid answer. All ad hominum and common idocy. 908's reply was not a good dispute against the original point, it's an opinion. It's an animal, humans, etc, purpose to survival. So common purpose would be 'survival' - and thus, it's not a poorly defined concept, just a highly diluted premise.

Please, next reply to this thread, provide some intelligent input. It's getting boring now.

>>2636921
I don't want to sound repetitive, but, you still haven't address the first contribution I made, even though we are currently in a debate that derives from it.... silly me, typical science.

Anyway, I didn't read your post. Try harder.

>>2636909
Stopped reading at "Bl...". I know your antics well, abomination, you're all the same.

>>2636904
"Outside," it's a word.
I'm currently God, which can be restructured to simply, "God," - and when I'm not explaining across the internet it is wordless. Due to the fact your post held no purpose, relevance or meaning, it wasn't credible and I did not really read it.

>>2636893
Again. I stopped reading at "You have be....". It's not a reply to the original contribution I made. It's your special and, subtle to new readers, way of dodging the things that prove your shit wrong. Keep trying though. I enjoy watching myself type.

>>2636889
Still nope. You're retarded. You did it again. You can explain "What makes them..." etc etc. You can never explain the "Why?" - but "Why?" and "What?" are equal. Magnets, how do they work?

Also, for lulz: -1 x -1 = -1

>>2636883
What a way to dodge the post I made.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>2636818
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NO ONE HAS BEEN ABLE TO DISPROVE THIS YET. IT IS THE CURRENT WINNING POST!

Thank you very much!

>>2636872
Again, not a reply. That's dribbling on your keyboard. I guess I win the debate then. Thanks for attempting. At least it wasn't just awkward silence.

>>2636859
Most likely samefag. Also, same applies. No-one says that "I'm new here.." before they make a reply. It holds no relevance what so ever. (i.e. oldfag wannabe who knows me and my wisdom well. who is jealous and cannot contend with the truth).

>>2636848
You're not new, no-one admits that. Also, you've used this many times before. Meaning that you're a regular and the cats got your tongue (lost for words, no suitable reply, cause you're wrong and cannot admit it - too proud).

>>2636843
Directed to me and not my post. Therefore irrelevant, and thus, not worth reading. I understood after the "(and angry)". All you modern scientists are the same, you dodge the points. Like that richard feynman when confronted with a question about magnets. He made a long reply that did not address the point what so ever. Scientists! Terrible word smiths, at best.

>>2636826
Incorrect. You can explain "What makes things go down?" but not "Why?" Also. Don't reply until you can provide a good dispute to my first contribution.

>>2636818
Keyword: Modern Science.

Real science is Alchemy, ask freemasons. They just don't get Government funding because it dont make the world go round or predict things. However, this is incorrect, it can predict the end of the world and universe! It can also use this information to try and prevent it. Modern Science on the other hand doesn't care, it employs money fiends with no passion. Hence, abomination.

Modern Science cannot answer the Why. Think of science as a terrible meaningless short-cut that tries to make a fantasy universe of words.

They can explain, "What makes something," by using knowledge of things which came before. Such as 'light' and 'colours'. Yet, they cannot explain "Why light?" or "Why colours?", which is their natural meaning. They just look at what it does and add a personified human meaning to it. For example, if I say "What is energy?" they will reply will an explanation for what it does, and then add this to its 'personified human meaning', but, at the end of the day, they don't know the meaning to energy, because in their little personified existence, there is not meaning, because this certain meaning cannot be explained.

Me; "Why the colour Red?"
Them; "Uhh. We cant explain that herp derp, light makes it come up, sometimes, herr hurr, you're fucking retarded, philosopher, go kill yourself. god dont exist."

Word upon Word upon Word. It's all science is. Remove words from existence, what do you have? Colours, shapes, forms (wordless), and obviously everything has meaning, for it can be seen, sensed, felt, smelt, tasted, etc.

"Why Light?"
Dunno. (Light is what it is; its meaning is "light")
"What is Light?"
Herr durr something that shines, its the only meaning word word word they are all that matters and exists I'm smarter than you cuz i have paper from school and it says so. Government funded of course. I love them.