/sci/ - Science & Math

;)
Good luck to him. Hopefully he isn't used as a propaganda fiend, but rather, does something good for the world.

>>2747148
I do not understand.

I'ma leave this thread, you guys are ruining my pelt.

>>2746997
Then you are assuming that everyone considers themselves individuals rather than united. Which isn't true, there is no 'you' without 'us' and vice versa. You can deny this universal truth, but then you would be in denial - simply because it is valid. What is good for 'us' is not the same as what is good for 'you', personally, and thus, if you place your good over ours, you are not doing something truly good.

The original picture is invalid.

>using the term "Good" without Religion
>thinks it is possible.

>>2746966
How do you understand it as the correct thing to do? Do you have any basis to what is considered 'Good' or are you a selfish prick who only considers the ratings given by peers as a valid determination of goodness?

No. You can't.

How can you be good without morality? You're fucking retarded.

It is Religion for me to force myself not to Sin, or something stupid like 'buy blue bowls'. I could call it the blue bowl Religion, a belief in never spending money on blue things.

So, how can you be 'Good', without a belief in morality? The concept of which the term 'Good' is born.

So what's the benefit of Atheism, in the long run. At this point in time you are discussing people and their beliefs. I don't see what Atheism is attempting to destroy - if it's "God," to what end? What differences are you hoping to see without God?

>>2746862
I believe the correct amount is "10%", which is accurate, I guess, surely it would be 1% as you use the singularity to progress. I use 0% of my brain, which is its original cubic pure intellect; I know it's cubic as I have the wisdom to measure the structure of 0 what-ness.

>>2746826
Which in turn reproduces ??

What does Atheism produce?

I am creating an Anti-Terrorist organization. I thought it would be beneficial to the world and all that inhabit it. What do you think?

ITT: Scientists are provided with sufficient evidence that shows time is cubic. In response they (them, those, 'specific group of abominations) throw stupid and irrelevant insults to try and suppress its content.

It's 1:30, "Time for work!"
It's 4:30, "The shops are closing!"
It's 19:00, "Homework time!"
It's 23:00, "Time to sleep!"

>>2694335
Come at me bro, with your linear robot time.

>>2694325
Then why do I have a smoke in my hand?

>>2694315
Yes, it's the wisest application possible.

>>2694294
Are you assuming that experience holds no credibility over evidence through deeper analysis by utilizing concepts? I wouldn't be too hasty, I can perform science without prior knowledge of the laws and tools that you prefer. I know, from relating factors to myself, through a process I call 'affinity', that each and everything has a front, back, left and right, top, bottom, inside and outside.

>>2694288
Elaborate.

I'm back.

If time isn't cubic then how come everything in the universe has a top, bottom, left and right, front, back and an inside and outside; existing as 0-value opposites?

Do insects evolve? If so, what has more evolutionary potential, an insect or a mammal? based on attitude, survival skills and various given abilities; for example, a spider can build a web, a bird can fly, and so on.

Do you think that humans played the same story as Adam and Eve? With the apple and what not, I have been thinking about it recently.

let go of your hate, accept the love