/sci/ - Science & Math

Nothing in laws of physics forbids techno singularity so far.

Also kinda find it hard he would do it solely for money, he's already rich, has company and all, awards from president, young genius that appeared in tv decades ago, many technological achievements.

Am thinking he tries to "spread" the knowledge to raise awareness of investors/engineers/scientists so they can fund/research it so he can live longer.

Not sure how much of his predictions are part of his wishful thinking, but certainly it has some ground.
The when is elusive.

I do believe that he believes it.
It turns out that dying *MIGHT* make you biased, more news at 11 and don't miss the weather news as well, in 2030 it might rain butthurt disappointment or nerd rupture.

>Why are they so cautious and pedantics?
Why such conclusion?

>>5648398
am pretty sure you smi le d :^)

>>5648380
It is, in a way.
>>5648389
You can wait for realistic dollies
>>5648390
Bake your beloved a qualia cake.

>>5648323
Not confidence, faggots can be confident too, some geeks can pull that of too.

Females and males are attracted to "healthy" genes, it's the rule of thumb of evolution.

In females it is expressed as symmetrical, fit and young appearance, so mainly physical.

In males it is expressed as height, "manly" facial characteristics and a dominant personality, "confidence" is a defacto feature of the above.
In a word, power, for the offspring and all that jazz.

Everything else is secondary.

Intelligence is only appreciated by females if:
1. You make lots of money out of it
You don't.
2. You make her laugh with that
You can't.
3. You stimulate her intellectually
Only pretentious art majors can do this, they have the female sense of cosmotheory due to their estrogen and serotonin infested brains.


No, arguing some sci-pop and philosophy semantics on the most basement dwelling corner of the internet isn't what females accept as intelligence.

>>5648310
>>5648298
she's ok, 6/10

The more important question is, why do you support finitism?
Any concrete reason?
I mean surely since you cuddle the concept so badly you must have a strong case, right? RIGHT?

>>5648255
You sound like le legion anoonimuse face, and you're obviously referring to that.

That isn't comparable to any real life normal collaboration.

>identifying yourself with a title
Why would you cancer yourself like that?

Not really in mood for writing text walls, so imagine a huuuge paragraph with the following words repeating throughout it many times:
Arbitrary, belief, philosophy, >>>/lgbt/, plebe, >reality, semantics

Cause we have more greek letters ahead of us.
>implying i would die by a gamma
Alpha male reporting in.

well, they have 53229 evolution points according to global evolution index association, we have 51992.
Soon.


Also if you actually bothered reading couple of paragraphs on basic concepts of evolution this thread wouldn't exist.

le lel would happen.

Real answer is that's a simple logical fallacy.
You're stating 2 axioms that cancel eachother out.

By placing an unstoppable force by default you rob the existence of an immovable object.

Logic 099, class dismissed.

Because of reality and its implications.
Also add SS to that, lower faggot.

>Presentism
>any ism
>2009+3.9+0.1
>ishniggerdigger

>>>/lit/
>>>/x/

>>5648148
that's rude, he explicitly stated that he couldn't solve anything beyond arithmetic and uses personality types to understand genes

>>5648131
>mathematical trick
>trick

>metric tensor
>metric
>tric

Aweyeah, gotcha.

>>5648125
When you're talking about things "outeside" of the universe you're talking outside of conventional understanding of physics to say the least.

Casual and causal logic ain't gonna help you right now.

>>5648116
I remember actually, it's a lil ploy to test your authenticity.
There is a chance ofcourse you just got lucky finding that post but welp.

Why are you still dwelling this place? Don't have better things to do?

>>5648091
Not him but we had some of that too, you were an arrogant selfentitled cunt, i was debating, you were arguing.

Examples, dunno, about evolution(you considered a snowball as a life form), big bang(you thought that big bang was an explosion of matter IN space rather than matter and space), all the entry level shit.

>>5648077
Well, the consistency of pics and writing style match, from what i recollect from before you giving up your trip.

For months i lived like a pllebe, vidya, movies, having fun with friends, gf, etc and i felt the light of my mind fading, less able to spot patterns, connect things, etc.

Then i sat down, read anything interesting, asked questions, try to answer them by writing the reasoning behind my reasoning, self meta-cognition, while at the same time am trying to tackle the question at hand.

After a while my brain pops analogies, connections,relating everything unwillingly to whatever am working on, epiphanies out of nowhere even when am synced out and doing random shit.

This has worked time and time again, no matter how many times and how long i disconnected my brain from high performance.
You just awaken that specific mode of your brain.

Plebe tier cosmotheory.
Enter the patrician's Omniverse.

>>5637548
Enjoy your estrogen filled manboobs.

>>5632940
Its actually

Jew-Lets jerk to more abstract ideas this time guys
Chink-Community, am nothing but a tool
Nigger-Muh dick
White- le liberal arts

>>5632752
Welp i'll take it as a compliment, though it's rather a basic concept.

Having said that, this perso-types are like bodytypes (endomorph, mesomorph, ectomorph).
Sure you can say there are x type of bodies and people are likely a combination of those, that doesn't make it "real" but it makes it an easy tool to describe some bodies.

Should be only used lightly to give a generic description.