[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.11849136 [View]

>>11847974
I see you bald monkey magnet man

>> No.11848345 [View]
File: 27 KB, 450x321, blank_slate.jpg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11848345

>>11848116
Post schnoz

>> No.11762120 [View]
File: 2 KB, 226x210, op_cart_28.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11762120

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_wars

So, when were you during the science wars time?
what is your opinion?
are you a scientific realist and postmodernist critic? and why?

>> No.3752047,3256 [INTERNAL]  [View]

Dial our Windows 10 support number 1-877-916-7666 any time you need help. Our qualified engineer will give authentic help to resolve your issues. This Windows 10 help desk remains active on a 24X7 basis. We have helped hundreds of Windows customers in the last few months.

>> No.11727106 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 53 KB, 567x319, 1576887166348.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11727106

>>11727100
Of course, my greatest ally and friend! I'll happily assist you in obtaining your rightful shekels from the White goyim.

>> No.3752047,3184 [INTERNAL]  [View]

Thank you for such kind informations. I blogged at this topic Comcast email not working.
Comcast email not working

>> No.11667684 [View]
File: 11 KB, 300x168, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11667684

>As this happened, factions with radical positions gradually gained influence. Especially important were the subjective Bayesians who argued that ethics could not be logically derived, so that instead of maximizing utility, a rational agent was free to maximize any chosen quantity. Their motto was remarkably similar to a saying credited to Hume:
>From an “is” one cannot derive an “ought”.
>Going further, the most extreme subjective Bayesians adopted spreading the Pure Logic movement as their only goal. All decisions were to be evaluated based on how much they furthered the spread of logical thinking. They took a vow to this effect, and pressed this vow on other citizens as a prerequisite for holding office of any sort. Their opponents dubbed them “Logic Extremists”, and the term stuck.
>In 2226, in a hard-fought political struggle, these extremists triumphed and completely pushed the Jaynesian-Bayesians and moderate subjective Bayesians out of power. Two years later V’Arak took control: a charismatic leader who asserted with 100% prior probability that the Federation was trying to subvert Vulcan culture and stop the spread of the Pure Logic movement.
>Any attempt to reason with V’arak and his supporters, or compromise with them, was interpreted as further evidence of an increasingly elaborate Federation conspiracy. Most Vulcans repudiated this stance, and as the Logic Extremists’ public support shrank they turned to terrorism.
>The violence came to a head around 2256, when V’latak (shown below) attempted to assassinate Sarek before the peace talks on Cancri IV, saying:
>My sacrifice will be a rallying cry to those who value logic above all. Vulcans will soon recognize and withdraw from the failed experiment known as the Federation.
>At this point support for the Logic Extremists rapidly dropped and the movement began to dissipate, though Patar still managed to infiltrate Section 31.

>> No.11667677 [View]
File: 21 KB, 390x488, 78a8069257cc216e9e7d964c99ee298b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11667677

>In the first half of the 22nd century, the central government had become corrupt, with Romulan operatives infiltrating the Vulcan High Command. Some Vulcans, the Syrannites, attempted to reinstate and develop the original teachings of the Vulcan philosopher Surak. But around 2140, another small group decided that Surak had not developed logic with sufficient thoroughness.
>This group of thinkers argued that all deductive reasoning should be formalized, all inductive reasoning should be Bayesian with explicit probabilities on hypotheses, and all decision-making should maximize utility.
>This group, who called themselves the Pure Logic movement, moved to Xir’tan and set up a commune there. They began a program of formal concept analysis so that all words would have precise definitions. Before each meal they bowed, seemingly in prayer, but actually to optimize their activities to come. Children were schooled in an even more disciplined way than usual: less high-tech than the skill domes of the 2200s, but with an intense focus on logic, semiotics, probability, and statistics.
>Conflicts erupted in 2200 between what we would call Jaynesian-Bayesians and hardcore subjective Bayesians. The former advocated entropy-maximizing priors. The latter argued that no prior counts as “right” without further assumptions, so one is free to start with any prior.
>As the Pure Logic movement became established, they spread and set up communes the main continent, especially in Gol, Xial and Raal. They started influencing the political establishment, first locally and then at the federal level.

>> No.11657627 [View]
File: 8 KB, 267x189, download.jpeg-5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11657627

My line of thought is this: Acidification of the oceans makes the coral become brittle, and the weight of the Atol slowly crushes the foundation of coral.. let us say that 1cm of height in the coral foundation is lost due to crushing, then that would mean that the atol would drop 1cm in height.
If I was standing on the beach of this atol, I would measure that the sea is rising. When in fact, I fell 1cm down.
Next, what does acid and a carbonate produce? CO2.
My question: is this a possible cause for the rising of the sea level, and a increase of CO2 in the atmosphere?


If it is, I'll write the Theory of Earth.

>> No.11644108 [View]
File: 82 KB, 478x358, 1382760457000.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11644108

Suppose, that there exist natural numbers that aren't interesting. Therefore, there exists the smallest such number. Being the smallest not interesting number is an interesting property, therefore the smallest not interesting number is interesting. By contradiction, every natural number is interesting.

>> No.3752047,3076 [INTERNAL]  [View]

Thanks for sharing useful information.Here I am also sharing our company profile.If you are looking for procurement,web development and mobile app, our company best for this.

>> No.11409572 [DELETED]  [View]

https://twitter.com/elijahcarlstrom/status/1231355166550609920?s=21

>> No.11409569 [View]

What do you guys think of this ? https://twitter.com/elijahcarlstrom/status/1231355166550609920?s=21

>> No.11353240 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 111 KB, 886x886, 67224818_643085816195755_4976164772891328512_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11353240

I have been taking nootropics for the last eight months and I'm usually high for 12-20 hours a day and doing alot of work. Writing a 140+ page research paper on the best nootropics to take. I will probably edit my first 40 page research paper and combine the two after I elucidate the mechanisms of action in the first paper and substantiate it further.

Might end up at like 200+ pages for the best nootropics to take.

Check me out on youtube by looking up John Lasheras.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aUS7O0CM1VMrFlb076znPMgqGeAcIaKN/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1XpMtZDeJ_J7dw703TMWb4_9dMBcn_1Mk

I stream live on dlive.tv/johnlasheras

As I've become exponentially more intelligent I look back on my past work and it was pretty sloppy, even on nootropics.

So just for a frame of reference, a two year supply of supplements from healthbynaturals and amazon and nootropics depot and or lower prices from ebay/google shopping

is about $800 for a two year supply, including my corporation's InvigorTECH.

Here's the InvigorTECH paper:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hPrZ8imnv31MskEY8RVObTzSqZ5kKfC3irH161drQ1o/edit?usp=sharing


Here's my corporation's upregulation methodology for cutting your tolerance break by 92% from 3 months down to one week:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1si_0jokeRliC1lzjc3k1xpx96PWpo9f9/view?usp=sharing

>> No.3752047,2127 [INTERNAL]  [View]

There is no need to worry if you experience one or the other small technical niggle with your McAfee antivirus. Are you seeing McAfee error 1603 message? Has there been McAfee installation error?

>> No.11260810 [View]

>>11260659
Simple. "[Luis's] pizza" is Marty's left over pizza. Thus Marty ate 4/6 of the 'original pizza' and Luis ate 5/18 of the 'original pizza', -both "his," pizza- This problem is great because it tests grammatical comprehension, critical thinking, creative reasoning, math skills, and logic.

>> No.11254948 [View]

>>11254940
>>11254941
>>11254946
>infinitely deep
in your mom.

>> No.11250698 [DELETED]  [View]

>>11250640
You can find me on Chegg @ John C. Search this question on high school geometry and I'll help you out with a 15 minute written lesson.

>> No.11214599 [View]

>>11214334
just get a microwave, mess with it. and put a banana in it you dummy.

>> No.11212103 [View]
File: 297 KB, 507x518, 3 David John Candlin.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11212103

this guy invented the Fermionic path integral, but credit accrued to Berezin, who wrote about it in a book a decade later. There is no dispute that David John Candlin is the inventor, his paper is a clear description of the anticommuting variables, reconstructing the state space, and producing the integral for them with the modern definition. Berezin was no slouch either, but he didn't invent the thing. This is not an attempt to steal credit from Berezin, but to attribute the result properly: David John Candlin is the sole inventor. Everyone else in 1956 had the wrong idea, including Feynman, Schwinger, and Salam. David John Candlin is still alive, and lives in Edinburgh, so there might be time to get his historical perspective on those events.
>Why was he underrecognized?
He didn't publish a lot.

>> No.3752047,1316 [INTERNAL]  [View]

A responsibility of appreciation is all together for sharing this information. I have gave this collaborate with other keep exhibiting such information on give top level law task help online at altogether moderate expenses. <a href="http://assignmenthelps.org/">assignment helps</a>

>> No.11168683 [View]

>>11164635
Technically speaking the hardest substance should be an unbreakable nucleus or elementary particle. Or possibly a black hole.

>> No.11168304 [View]
File: 868 KB, 1473x2101, 1554437735701.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11168304

>>11167847
Theorem: There is no square root of 0.
Proof: If [math]x^2 = 0[/math] then [math](-x)^2 = 0[/math] as well. But then [math]0 = x^2 - (-x)^2 = (x + (-x))\cdot (x - (-x)) = 0 \cdot 2x[/math]. Thus [math]x = {0 \over 2 \cdot 0}[/math]. But this is impossible, since it requires division by zero. [math]\qed[/math]

>> No.11120630 [View]

>>11118152
I went blind for a while too when i took one too many fat bong rips when i was hotboxing a car

Navigation
View posts[-96][-48][-24][+24][+48][+96]