/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4498614

was thinking that but did not mention because i'm not an asshole

i'm not here to prove you wrong.

i'm not here to prove me correct.

for polite discussion.

>picture, blood cell?

(bare with me here)

>>4498589

i like you. please continue.

it's not silly.

somewhere deep inside me says this is actual reality.

this creature is 13 billion years old and still growing.

we are but small particles on this being.

how long do the cells live on our bodies?

compared to us not long

i believe life may go infinitely in both directions

both speeding up and slowing down in corresponding larger/smaller "universes"

>>4498569

>Most galaxies will burn out before they collide with anything else

oh i'm sorry. so...our galaxy hasn't collided with anything else???

please, explain the creation of the super-massive black hole at the center of...almost any galaxy.

had to 'eat' something to become super-massive

right?

although your arguement is quite valid form a /sci/ standpoint

and i'm not saying they act COMPLETELY alike.

just conveniently similar

>>4498558

yes yes i know

What the question actually is:

name for this theory?

but i have thought this for quite sometiem.

yes, picture got me a little excited.

can it really be coincidence?

did said computer KNOW what a neuron was beforehand?

>>4498559

you think so? i was thinking star system to atom

>>4498556

Thank you sir.

i think i have a valid discussion at hand.

>>4498550
>>4498550

alright sir.

i will carry my discussion elsewhere if you are not interested.

Philosophy belongs in literature huh?

Philosophy = literature

i think not

always thought 4chan needed a /Phil/

Actually. all pictures related.

can you argue that, on a massively large timescale this beautiful galaxy doesn't act like an amoeba?

Cell is to Galaxy

Solar system is to atom

Is there a name for this theory?

ever since i was little i thought that galaxies and star systems were like cells and atoms and such on an unimaginably ginormous organism

why not?

cells and bacteria 'live' on us without knowing it.

why can't we be the same?

the 'expansion' of the universe is the growth of an organism from birth.

the redshift we see from most other galaxies i would say is a growth spurt of said organism

etc.

discuss?

Pictures both related

hai guise!

Im taking a Master Degreen in MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, and i have to select what project to work on. Heres is the list:

http://www.mn.uio.no/imbv/studier/masteroppgaver/

WHAT MASTER PROJECT WOULD YOU GUYS RECOMMEND/SUGGEST?

>evolution to justify racism
>evolution to justify social darwinism
>evolution to justify political views
>homosexuality isnt "natural" or its "against nature"

also- i dont care how much biology i know, ive somehow picked up an irrational fear of deep water and/or stepping on something

>>2324276
4/10 you made me post, and will probably troll others

>>2324260
no, genuinely dumb.

were does everyone go to school, and for anything specific?

im at a comm. college right now, considering ecology, theres this guy on /sci/ who's doing ecology and he says he does a lot of field research, which is what im shooting for.

reporting in
i actually shat myself when i found a real life version of OP's pic at my school. i actually keep it in my room now as sort of a novelty...i think i may start collecting them...anyway

youd be surprised how many people ask "if we came from monkeys why are there still monkeys?"

other random stories- nurse in my micro class asked if humans could breed with other animals. also asked if humans were eukaryotes. i now fear all nurses.