/sci/ - Science & Math

you do know that low testosterone doesn't just affect physical attribute right ?

lack of sexual desire
decreased sexual satisfaction
depressed mood
lethargy
muscle weakness
bad production of new cell

if that was just a matter of cup size we wouldn't even bother researching

We are scientificly confused of what we just heard

It is a fact that the average male testosterone rate is droping every year.

But what about the Woman ? After all, even tho it's presence is lower compared to male it's still a vitale chemical for woman.

We were wondering if research were made that show the evolution of testosterone rate in a woman body from a certain period of time of at least 20 years

>>14632398
>I'll do my own thinking once I'm qualified
>wait, im science now and im fucking retarded
In my academic and professional pursuits I never got to the "im science now" part because I have always been aware of how retarded I am. You can't be science and be retarded (for me it's data science).
>voice in their head running a constant introspection loop
Mine just keeps reminding me how retarded I am. How pathetic and amateurish my work is. How little I know what I'm talking about.

>>14522140
black science man

>>14494804
Literally this

>>12691169

SWIM may have taken bad rolls

SWIM is applying for a job

How do you get all traces of drugs out of a hair sample?

Does bleaching it really remove all traces?

I know it lowers the nanogram per milliliter levels for some chemical compounds but what about all?

>>how do I get mdma/meth/cannabis out of hair sample

>>12517215
you can tell exact angular size or albedo with 0 reference?
call the fucking guniess book.

whats the smallest rocket that can reach orbit?

>>12516682
still only works at close range, the difference is extremely minute at distance

>>12516480
To add, human eye is no precision instrument. parallax have to work just good enough for out ancestors to chuck spears at something 20m away not 10km. It is but a part of our visual sensory suite, we rely on all available cues to make sense of the world.

>Close one eye, I don't know how you, but I lose depth perception pretty much completely when I do.
Try this on a mountain or a ship or something further away and see if you could tell the angular difference. At that point you're relying on combination of some other cues to guess the plausible distance.

http://www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/knowledge_base/virtual-worlds/EVE/III.A.1.c.DepthCues.html
https://www.sciencefocus.com/the-human-body/how-small-can-the-naked-eye-see/

>>12515711
your dumbass if you think people rely on parallax alone to judge distance

that said parallax works best for nearby object, unless your eyes 1 km apart

>>12516110
you need to do quantum dating
just throw away all the universe where you've chosen the wrong dialog choices

>>12503549
define "human"

>>12515263
ok, fuck the moon but remove those 2 effects and you'll still get the same result
>>12515643
did you know parallax effect gets weaker with distance?

maybe it works if somebody lived in such environment throughout their lives but normal earthling use all kinds of cues in addition to parallax for judgement.

>>12497212
>>12497256
imagine falling for yet another irl clickbait

>>12514205
perspective and atmospheric perspective
which is why faraway mountain on the moon appears closer

>>12283326
It’s just a gay thread for insecure pseuds lol, if you wanted to do math why didn’t you do mathematics? Seems like a strange way to cope tbqhdesufam

>>12188909
>if free will doesn't exist, does it mean his forced smile was real all the time?

>>12188909
>If free will doesn't exist, does it mean the Riemann hypothesis is green?

>>12188909
>If free will doesn't exist, does it mean we eat clinics all the time?

>>12186641
so you want to fuck a swastika backwards
u sick