/sci/ - Science & Math

Too bad people are so stupid.

By the way, I use a translator, so sometimes there may be problems in the text, Google Translater sometimes inserts other words in meaning, changes the meaning of sentences, etc.
Sometimes it seems to me that it is being developed completely inadequate.

>>11254440
But if the device of universes and our species, in more fundamental worlds, is like the device of animal DNA, if natural selection is passed, etc. ...
Then our Bible could go all this evolutionary path in past universes and in adults, etc.

In short, I’ve been thinking about all these things for many years.
For you, this is just a joke, because you do not know how this world works.

If we create new universes, are we gods?
Or God is simply the invention of man, the superself.
And if adults have sex to create new egg-universes, does that change anything?
...

In fact, all this does not matter what.
We need only those technologies that will help us defeat the others in this egg and which will help us after hatching.
I don’t know what kind of world there is ... "Paradise" or the world of endless wars ...
Rather, something is "average."
(I hate bipolar models for idiots, scientists argue about chaos and order, although they themselves created these concepts; they will argue endlessly; God, why are all such idiots?)

>>11254423
Does the Pi number conceal the entire history of the world and its structure?

>>11254412
I did not conduct any experiments except mental ones.

In addition, you need ultra-precise equipment. which costs a ton of money.

>>11254417
This is an experience.

And read at last on Wikipedia and ICD10 what schizophrenia is.

>>11254383
"Evolution of the Universes"
"We are robots that must create new universes."

How does the world work? Matryoshka, worlds inside other worlds, etc.
The Universe is an egg (uterus ...), from which the strongest info-vector will hatch, which will kill everyone else.
...

License: Public Domain

You can also tell your friends about this.


But I do not believe you, like everyone else. I don’t even believe myself.

Good luck!

>>11254383
>>11254328

>>11254279
words of a person who does not understand that
leg shorter than hypotenuse

>>11254258
If the reduction in length acts in only one direction ... We can see a slowdown in the speed of light only in this case ...
Then you need to do as in the picture, to recreate it in reality.

Similarly with the change in mass, etc.
It all depends on the specific situation.

I once did these drawings, etc. ...
But all this is simply not interesting to anyone, and on Wikipedia my messages were simply deleted.

I was confused by some things, for example, a change in mass, but I told myself that all the experiments had already been carried out and they should have noticed a problem that would appear in some cases.

>>11254258
You should ask this question to professional practicing physicists. (They will tell you how to conduct the experiment.)

But first, consult with professional theoretical physicists. (First you need to decide on the theoretical part, these people should try to explain why light has two different speeds in this case.)

If you have such acquaintances, for example in institutes, then this is simply wonderful!


And I'll just tell you:
The world is endless and its structure is endless.
We will never know the complete structure of the world.

>>11254139

>>11254139
I have already shown you my work, in it the speed of light differs for different observers.

None of you could refute my theory. I emphasize this.
In fact, you do not understand why the same light passed a different distance for different observers.
You begin to dodge and make excuses.

You are also cowards, you are afraid to accept the facts.

In fact, your behavior is standard for any person, if a person began to believe in God, then this is for a long time, and maybe until the end of his life.

You must admit defeat.

Otherwise, answer the question: "why did the light travel a different distance for different observers?"

Either make an adequate refutation of the theory, or simply shut up forever and lower your heads.

Make your choice, you are either led sheep or leaders.
There are simply no other options here.

>>11253458
Are you sure that such experiments were carried out?

Your problem is that your mind is limited to a standard model.
And this is not a joke at all.

>>11253149
There is no point in talking about other dimensions, another space, etc.

The deceleration of time has already been confirmed, we look at the picture and see that this is the time that light passed in the moving system.

Other options: vary c; vary c and t at the same time; all this is wrong, since the model system is not complete, etc.
But we will not talk about all this, we will make everything as simple as possible.

I will make my last attempt to explain to you my great work, which will change the whole future of mankind.


We have two paths that the light passed (the same light): cathetus and hypotenuse. If the speed of light is constant, then they should be equal.
But the leg and hypotenuse of a right triangle are not equal.
And this means that specifically in the special theory of relativity, the speed of light is not constant.

We can divide both distances by t or by t1 or at any other time and we will get the speed.
And this speed is different on hypotenuse and on the leg.
But she had to be the same.

Light went through both paths, the same light, but one system is at rest and the other is moving.

In any case, if time slows down in reality, and this is a fact, and if we look at the figure, we will see that, first of all, in the special theory of relativity, it is light that slows down. Because the time that the light went (slowing down the processes inside the moving system) decreased.

>>11252478
Ahahah, but I already sent it to CERN, NASA, the Pentagon, the President of the United States and aliens on personal connections.

If you are not able to understand that hypotenuse is longer than a cathetus, then you are completely untermenschs.
I will no longer waste my time on you.
I am just God compared to you, insignificance. You are aphids.

Einstein said ... blablabla, yes, Einstein was smarter than you. So what?
If a person is smarter than you, then all that he says is true?
Do not make yourself an idol, lemming.

Yes! We will not use our brain, we will simply repeat what others say. We do not care about facts and objectivity!

Complete degeneration.

>>11252257
Then the Pythagorean theorem is not true.

quality fixed