/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2715550
oh... ok, Then why not re model the economy so that it is manageable?

>>2715529
Thats the most retarded thing I have ever heard, and why I think technocracy is a good idea, It leaves important decisions to those who SHOULD acutally make them.

>>2715527
wut
tomato is a fruit.

>>2715506
I think youre skipping a few steps, I honestly can't follow youre logic. Why are you talking about free enterprise?

>>2715495
So a political scientest will have the final say in going with oil untill it runs out and energy crisis happens, or nuke power wich is a much better alternative

>>2715437
lol wut

The west dominated the 20rth century because you state Scientists/Engineers and Politicians can't run the economy?

>>2715413
George Bush was president, I dont think he was very intulectualy acclaimed. There are other countrys that have leaders who are bat shit crazy.

I would like there to be a system where people get into power who have the best intrest in founding knowledge, and preserving life.

I don't think lawyers and politicians are those kinds of people.

>>2715351
And politicians somehow do have the ability to run the economy top down.

>>2715304
I think people who are going to RUN COUNTRYS should be intellectually acclaimed not politicaly gifted.
Also I don't think technocracy bends to peoples peals of banning nuke power like politicians

>>All of you

Why is there no big push for technocracy in Europe, North America, Australia?

Or at least non that I have ever heard of?

>>2715254
scientists and engineers ////who\\\\ have the technical expertise to coordinate the economy.

I wouldn't ask an astronomer to run the economy
"who" is there in the fist post idk why yours does not have it.

Technocracy seems to be a good idea.

The technocracy movement is a social movement that proposes replacing politicians with scientists and engineers who have the technical expertise to coordinate the economy.

I would go a little further then that, I would love to see a country that is run by people who have degrees/Phd's in science or engineering.

Since the most of the public is so misinformed by the media and generaly ignorant and too stupid to make the right decision. (i.e. the banning of nuclear power) It would be nice to see leaders who are elected because of their technical specialty instead of their political capital, religion , or image.

What is your opinion?

  ▲
▲ ▲