/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4065795
lets make things a bit clearer for the sake of discussion, please define this premise which you say is "proven"

>>4065793
so youre admitting science itself is based on an unprovable premise?

>>4065780
your original objection was that "hurr durr the premise is still true" to which i replied "my good sir, the premise in and of itself means nothing"

and i was correct and if that wasnt you then why engage if you cant follow the argument? either way, you lose.

>>4065763
yea, and either or both can be wrong. whats your point?

>>4065749
and i guess that explains why you believe in hoaxes like global warming

>>4065729
premises are nothing in and of themselves, merely a perspective with which to view the hypothesis. you dont claim something is true based on premises.

>>4065682
>emails on public display for all to see

>UNSUPPORTED ACCUSATIONZ NO EVIDENZ I BELIEVES IN SCIENZ HURR DURRR

its like atheists dont even know the definitions of the words they use. they just hear dawkins say "unsupported hurr dur no evidenz hurr durr" and they think they can use it in any argument for an automatic win

>>4065563
>climate change is real

lol if its so real why do you have to constantly change its name to support the evidence (or lack thereof)

global warming > climate disruption > climate change

every consecutive one becomes more vague so the propaganda can fit around the lack of evidence. whats the next one? "stuff happens"


lollll

>hacked emails released to the public show global warming experts secretly agreeing that the evidence is weak and that the push against carbon emissions is more political than scientific

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2011/11/23/climategate-2-0-new-e-mails-rock-the-global-warmi
ng-debate/

hurr durr i believ in scienz

one of many serious works that have been suppressed

the amount of science done proving the heritability of intelligence, and even the low intelligence of blacks as a heritable trait, is countless