/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2758690
do you agree or are you stupid?

When you interpret the world, its changes and the most outstanding events, you should do so under the impression of what has happened, rather than the opinions of other people on "what has happened."

Why is colour? Why do we need to recognize our environment? If there was no free will or meaning then surely it would be an unobservable thing. There would be no need for the colourful sprinkling on top, to essentially "help us," if we were just robots or 'meaningless' (trait of which makes us recognizable as oppose to others) creatures.

Why?

>>2754266
Basically singularity worshipping demon math.

>>2754195
>what does physics do
>"right now"

>>2754190
Hey bro, long time no speak. Shall we venture through the universe through words?

>>2754182
Hurr

what does physics do, what is its latest discovery?

What if humans and other creatures were extinct, but foliage and various non-moving (not 'live') things did, to what ends would cycles of nature reach. Would new layers form on the Earth, and transform/evolve; over a 'large' time period as well as in further detail.

>>2753589

eeeee

I thought it looked pretty cool when she had her pain relieved, the baby coming out full is art.

>mfw they make war look like sports on cnn

>>2751854
>>2751854
>20yearslaterustillmad.png

>>2751843
God = x

What is imagination?

>>2749451

>>2749396
>a fag
>using weird sounds to project he believes in evolution and/or 'no God'

>>2749343
Science is already dead.

Hey faggits. Atheism produces paper and fags, get used to it. They say they 'believe' in evolution, but really, all they're doing is making a weird sound to project the fact that they acknowledge it occurred. Truly 'believing' in evolution would be being a part of it. Atheism has evolved as far as fags and paper, but learned to create different things out of it. Also, deja vu.

>>2747585
Agreed.

>>2747555
;)

>>2747264
So there really is no point in Atheism, you just don't want the terms: Sin, Greed, Jealousy, Lust, Vanity, and so forth being used in society. Apparently, as 'there is no God', we have surpassed that stage. Taking into consideration the Earth has not changed since the beginning of the stone age + all factors have just been moved; the same concepts of Sin would still be in their primitive form. If God wasn't around back then, sure, you are correct. However, if God was around in the past (and you're thinking of letting go of the past), you are lying and incorrect, for things do not just magically disappear - they either decay and renew as something else or blend silently with other things.