/sci/ - Science & Math

Eat soup, drink juice, get offline and sleep. Also, open your window and get some fresh air going on.

>>1820175
Lol. ^_^

Well, it's not like we're going to resolve this now. By the way: "'god' is a subjective term based on the idea of the creation of existence." has given me something to chew over; thanks.

(Side note: I just found this picture, it's awesome.)

>>1820151
>I gave you my definition, 'god' is a subjective term based on the idea of the creation of existence.

If I read that right, then you're proposing an existence, that existed, before existence; which created existence.

>...to be arrogant, but I certainly feel that way about you.

Arrogant~exaggerating or disposed to exaggerate one's own worth or importance often by an overbearing manner.

Ya that makes sense.

"I don't care what is written about me as long as it isn't true."

~Katherine Hepburn

Personally, I'm going for something involving vikings, asteroids, and a snowboard on an avalanche.

"Drawing on my fine command of the language, I said nothing."

~Robert Benchley

>>1820127
Not really, but I simply ignored it. Since you only insist that it doesn't apply due to arbitrary constraints; which you made up on the spot, to attach to your definition-less proposal.

The lunar landscape is so bright that the camera exposure settings to take a good lunar landscape photo are not sensitive enough to image the much fainter stars that are in the lunar sky. If the camera was set to record the stars, the moonscape would be washed out white and featureless.

Bear in mind that from the sun to the moon is a straight line with nothing in between.

>>1820113
Cute. Still baseless either way though.

So do you like blueberry muffins? If so, what kind of topping?

>>1820098
In other words, your making stuff up.

>>1820076
So, what you're telling me, is that you think everything ever thought of, is real(in the literal sense)?

>>1820074

...out of curiosity does this 'god' also have a 'creator'?

As an aside, you know this how?

>>1820057
Your proposal has no working definition in the least? How are you even remotely capable of critically thinking about a subject, upon which you refuse, or are unable to decipher, any definitive qualities?

This is akin to arguing over the 'cshdfs' found inside of your sewer, while simultaneously having no definition of what a 'cshdfs' is; aside from the fact that it apparently exists within your sewer, despite not actually having any evidence to support your undefinable proposal in the first place.

>>1820049
So, anything(no matter how stupid) that I think of, and claim to exist, you can't deny, and say it doesn't. Purely on the grounds that you can not 'know' that it does not exist.

Upon which point I must ask: what is fiction?

>>1820029
Not from what I've seen.

It appears to be that the majority of the core populace is actually composed of intelligent individuals; whereas the site is occasionally flooded with stupid people from other boards.

>>1820011
And how would you describe those proposals?

'something, something, something, incorporeal, magical, invisible, outside of space-time(as though this is even coherent), something'

>>1819983
Here, why don't I just type up the paragraph for you and send it via e-mail?

>>1819997
That same point can be said about alcohol; everything(that isn't outright hazardous) in moderation I suppose.

>>1819977
Now replace 'god' with 'pixie' in that post; and read it out loud.

>>1819979
Well my second answer was what I would have liked to be. My bunny answer was something that I laughed at.

And my serious answer is as follows:

"All are but parts of one stupendous whole,
Whose body nature is, and God the soul;"

This line is taken from the same poem, in the same paragraph, only a dozen or so lines above.

>>1819961
Death.

>>1819930
A bunny.

>>1819916
>So I had this idea...it's something that can't be detected, for all intents and purposes uses magic to get things done, created the universe, is sentient without a body, is all powerful, all knowing, whatever other contradicting terms I'd like to throw in there, only exists where you're not looking. But you can't say it's made up, even if I literally did just make it up(See FSM), because that'd make you arrogant, since you can't 'know' that it's not made up.

How is the question of deities even acceptable?

>>1819392
lol, works every damn time.