/sci/ - Science & Math

>>1156854
Newton proved it to be true and you can understand it intuitively if you try.

I will simply inform you that the model of centre of gravity for an object fails when you are inside the object, in many cases, including the case of a hollow sphere.

>>1156166 you need to realize he needs to pay for shit while saving up

I don't understand what that means. Can you rephrase it?

Personally my undergrad degree is costing ~£20000, at a good university rather than a local one, while his differential between a good university and a bad university already eclipses that. :S

>>1156028
>save 60k

Oh my fuck what country is this? Are you an American? Holy shit that's bad.

Less oxygen?

>>1154923
>Supposed to
>Appeal to nature fallacy

>>1154917
Neither of the people in OP's pic look ugly to me...

Don't we share ~98% DNA with flies? Why so low with Neanderthals? I guess it must only be using a particular part of the genome, but this isn't clearly stated and is important because it makes the percent value given almost arbitrary.

And isn't this basically saying that there is evidence that Jews are better than others and are the reason for the success of the western world? How does one derive anti-Semitism from this?

It's long been obvious to me that Jews are smart guys. (The ones that have the genes but not the religion.) So what? :S

>>1154291
>Implying you could have a science board without atheists.

>>1153851
Doesn't have to use up all its hydrogen to explode. Only uses a fraction, I believe.

>>1153843
You're forgotten the half that bitch and moan about how he's being mean and hurting religious people's feelings. Oh, and how he somehow isn't a real scientist.

Yep, /sci/ has three halves.

I don't know its name, OP, but you've illustrated that /sci/ has a lot of ignorant people.

No.

>>1151349
I GET IT.

>>1153296
What made you think [endmath] would work, anyway? :S

>>1153240
Then substitute e^z = u back into that last line.

>>1153222
Women are meant to have hair, don't permanently remove it. Just because it's fashionable at the moment for women to have bodies like 10 year old girls does not mean you should get rid of it.

>>1153211
e^z = u :P

>>1153182
Ignore "dz".

Thought I got it using <span class="math"> a = \frac{1}{e^z-e} dz [/spoiler] but I guess not, Wolfram doesn't agree. (I got -ln a.)

>>1153154
Oh I got it. I dunno.

Can't see shit. What are those symbols in the denominator?

If either one is meant to be z then your handwriting is abysmal. If not, then it's a ridiculously easy integral.

>>1148894
Yeah, thanks. That's all that I was missing. /thread

>>1148894
Why, differential form! Of course! I will go 'ave a gander.

Bump for real science on /sci/