/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9564751
>>9564762
>>9564790
Sorry I just don't think we are on the same page...
What I'm trying to say is that a point particle takes up zero volume and hence zero area. So if you have another gravitational source that propagates it's "gravitational sphere" outwards in all directions, the surface area of it obviously becomes greater, and hence the intensity becomes less. Now lets say we placed a point particle, A, that could be accelerated by gravity, near gravity source B. Depending on how close A is to B, B will have a greater/smaller "gravitational sphere", which kisses A. But since A is a point particle, it covers zero area; So no matter how close A is to B, A will still cover no surface area of the gravity sphere that propagates out from B. Hence, I WOULD think that point particles are not affected by gravity... Which begins to mess with my brain!

>>9564705
Explain more please?

So the derivation and intuition behibd it feels good and makes sense. However, lets say we had an infinitely small particle sharing the same space as a particle that is emitting a field. What do? We know a point particle covers 0 area, no matter how close it is to the source. So should 1/(r^2) not apply to point particles? Or do perhaps a gravitational field produces a probability field for gravitons to appear, in which gravitons are assumed to be larger than an infinitesmally small point and they could perhaps nestle in planck wells or pocket? Or perhaps, the gravity source will change the properties of space surrounding it, so any other particles within that modified space are accelerated..... which wouldn't make sense to me. Should I treat a gravitational field like light, and assume it is both a particle and a wave?

First thing is first you can’t travel faster than light
Next if you are talking about what I think you are then you want to create a Bose-Einstein Bridge
The problem is that it requires dark matter to keep open and stable
I understand the idea of anti-matter for fuel and storing in a “bathtub” of electromagnetic energy also it would be a fuel source because it has a 100% matter to energy conversion when it is paired with normal matter
So yeah

>this fat blob of human shit is shitposting with brainlet wojacks 24/7

is economy a science?

Please help me out /sci/!
I'm in need of a bunch of science related gifs
Please dump all of your science gifs/pictures/etc.
>Bonus points for biology related
>Double bonus points if you provide sauce
Thank you in advance for anything you have.

Post your anything science/math related wallpapers!

How do I become a science guy? Ever since I was a child I have wanted to do science, but I don't know how. If I knew how to do science I would do it all day. How to I start doing science and how long will it take to become a science guy?

>>9218635
>who
Who?

I got into computer science because I wanted to make mods for video games
:^)

Fuck you

>>9204094
Sorry I meant a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science.

Hello /sci/,
Just asking, what should I know before I join a CS course in uni ?
What am I expected to know before it ?

Thanks

Hello /sci/,
Just asking, what should I know before I join a CS course in uni ?
As in what are the prerequisites, etc.

Thanks

ones a huge shooting rock in space, ones a life draining jellyfish on the brink of extinction.the last one is a well.. "sub species" to put it that way

makes good money i guess. not something i would major in but still a good job

its normal considering your hard studies. it just means your focusing well. like for example, the effects of adderall (yes i take it during studies so i can be productive i dont have ADHD) causes you to not blink to often maybe because my eyes are dry because of focusing. or maybe the pill effects moisture in the body. sorry for getting sidetrack but in the end your lack of sleep is probably causing your eyes to act in that behavior. try to get more sleep and maintain a healthy diet

i'm trying to extract uranium from the ore. iv'e done everything i'm supposed to but its not going through that that series of reactions like i predicted.i think i may have messed something up. if i do get it to go through a reaction Is it supposed to lead up to UO2(SO4)3 or did i mess up. i maybe think it could be UO2(SO4) except instead of the power of 3 its the power of 4. Any help?

What could be out there, universe is expanding... true, but into what?
Thoughts and theories???

>>9184964
>One God, one Univers
yeah thats what kinda fucking sucks is that there soooo much to discover and these topics are so futuristic and interesting

>>9184959
exactly that's the problem with them. they have no real value in science because theres no proof. until we get technology good enough to prove it. we dont even know its real. so like you said there as scientific as religion

lets start with one thing is the multiverse real? like if you look at theories that are you universe is linked with other versions that happen simultaneously. So if that is true or humans can prove it, Could we travel to these linked realities?

>>9182146
just keep it going you'll get it soon