/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12181331
but they can at put on a dog and pony show a couple times a month

>>12141037
Good idea. His artwork is cool, but sort of a one trick pony that could be replaced by an app

>>12020750

It's hell. You are correct, op. Work in engineering is just pointless. There's this bizarre phenomena where idiots get promoted, because they can't do engineering, to do administrative tasks, but then think they are smarter than everyone else. They just exist to fuck shit up and blame you. I've been in the industry for 10 years, and most of my time has been wasted doing the wrong projects the wrong way because some boomer semi-moron needs a dog and pony show to impress some even dumber boomer higher up on the corporate ladder.

>>11992792
>it needs to be coded and turned on by a human
And this has happened, anon.
>it's a one trick pony
Did you know it can solve math problems, play chess, compose music, or write code if you feed in textual representations? It's not very good at any of these things, but most people aren't.
>It wont take over the world
Neither will "the dumbest humans"

>>11992766
So it can talk so what? It wont take over the world. It needs to be coded and turned on by a human. it's a one trick pony not an Intelligent being like a human is

>>11909457
sure, if you kiss a magic rainbow pony

tell mom & dad that you didn't get into harvard because they were too dumb an poor to pony up the required $6,000,000 bribe

>>11897759
I view category theory the same way I view my little pony to me. Its fine when used by its intended audience, mathematicians who might find it useful and 8 year old girls, respectively. But both attract austistic trannies for some weird reason.

Pony up, nerd boy, your taxes are due bootlicker!

>>11875721
Gödel was kind of a heterodox figure. in fact, in the latter part of his career, he was basically a crank. he is quoted saying things like “i don’t believe in science” and keep in mind that he was not a scientist, he was a mathematician. and, for the record, he was basically a one-trick pony at math

his whole god thing should be assessed using the same amount of skepticism. he had his opinions, OK, he was some sort of religious, granted. but putting that into context with the rest of what he says — basically all his opinions outside of his tiny niche of fundamental math were either blatantly wrong or completely ridiculous. so unless you are studying something very close to what Gödel’s research was, you can rest assured that d everything else he opined on was complete shit

>>11875721
Gödel was kind of a heterodox figure. in fact, in the latter part of his career, he was basically a crank. he is quoted saying things like “i don’t believe in science” and keep in mind that he was not a scientist, he was a mathematician. and, for the record, he was basically a one-trick pony at math Some anon posted the article on /tv/ and I was curious.

his whole god thing should be assessed using the same amount of skepticism. he had his opinions, OK, he was some sort of religious, granted. but putting that into context with the rest of what he says — basically all his opinions outside of his tiny niche of fundamental math were either blatantly wrong or completely ridiculous. so unless you are studying something very close to what Gödel’s research was, you can rest assured that d everything else he opined on was complete shit

>>11868689
If I crawl around on all fours, do I become a majestic pony? Trannies are abominations and a sign of the end times.

>>11793598
Scientifically speaking, why is My Little Pony giving rise to Nazis loving Marvel movies as they cook apple dumpling pie while wearing Dockers and Supreme?

>>11763567
Definitely, I tried my little pony porn 4 years ago and now I share a looot of fetishes that people draw

>>11752132
Hrs just another meme celebrity propped up by media and Jews-christkikes

he was close with Jeffery Epstein, he relied on Epstein for money and made him a board member of his company, his grandfather has been the leader of the technocracy movement in Canada that aimed to replace elected representatives with technocrats and hand picked “experts” with ofcourse a particular political and ideological standing.

Now this autistic fag larps as a right wing, pro America retard when in truth, he is just another propped up pony like zuckerberg is.

remember Darpa was working on a attractive social media cum spy program that would have intricate data of each and every individual in the world, which was promptly cancelled in 2004 and a month later, “mega genius” Mr. Zuckerberg came up with a social media platform where people willingly put in all their data which was shared with relevant govt authorities while amerisharts cucked themselves for selfies and likes

>>11727318
kek, though so far he's a one trick pony, and really good trick though.
the world is due a biotech champion.

>>11691549
>you've bought Gates' good guy dog and pony show while his wealth has continued to balloon past $95B
There are firm differences between Gates and Bezos. Gates has donated over $30b to philanthropic causes. Bezos has donated far less than $1b (discounting money that is 'pledged' but not disbursed, at least as of yet).

>Jeff's hobby is trying to get us further into space.
great that his redundant hobby comes at the cost of millions of potential scientists and astronauts

>I don't give a shit if a million poor monkeys are living in squalor. Humanity is uplifted by its greatest contributors, not retards who can't figure out how to make anything better than a tent.
finally you say what you actually mean. you don't care about people - you care about money. if you had just said "fuck the poor" from the start I wouldn't have bothered to engage you like a person that isn't a narcissistic loser.

the sad irony too is that you're probably below average in income. the majority of corporate stoolies aren't successful businessmen - they're poor people in denial about their own poverty. am I hitting in the ballpark here?

>>11691539

The funny part is that you're so superficially minded that you've bought Gates' good guy dog and pony show while his wealth has continued to balloon past $95B. Jeff's hobby is trying to get us further into space.

I don't give a shit if a million poor monkeys are living in squalor. Humanity is uplifted by its greatest contributors, not retards who can't figure out how to make anything better than a tent. If your priority is constantly the lowest common denominator you will become a lowest common denominator society... or, socialist. Many such cases!

>>11681375
Yeah, hold up there bud. You said there were contradictions BETWEEN my sources so where are they? Pony up.
All you've done is prove you're kinda dumb here:
>>11681372
and prove it further with this absolute fucking retardation fucking LOL
Okay so you know how people are HYPER FUCKING AGGRESSIVE? It's usually because they have a fucking load of testosterone. Testosterone having an effect on human behavior is elementary shit and you are embarrassing yourself with every post.

No anon that would require admitting that they're suffering from conventional, clinical Delusion. Better to keep this political dog and pony show going.

>>11602321
Sounds amazing to be an astronaut then. My roommates and neighbours are always giving me shit about my role-playing sessions with my onaholes/pony's, especially when I do their Japanese voices and play the MLP theme song on max volume. On the ISS I could do that every night without any complaints.

>>11602216
So the other astronauts are just supposed to pretend they don't know about the onahole and my little pony-fuckdoll collection you brought aboard the space station?

>>11601135
https://www.dmi.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/Rapporter/TR/2018/DMIRep18-04.pdf

>>11601170
>this is semantics.
So you get the same result if you compare trend to trend? No, both trends are decreasing over 10000 years.

>the trends to trends or the increases to increases aren't correlated.
LOL, they are the same.

>there is no warming >>11600947
I already showed you there is here >>11601041 and nothing you posted shows a lack of warming.

>you are misrepresenting the greenhouse effect as the mechanism behind the warming of the earth. The greenhouse effect talks about gasses ability to absorb heat this not a model of the earths climate
The greenhouse effect involves the ability of gasses to absorb *and emit* heat, and is a necessary part of any model of the Earth's climate. It's funny how you accuse me of misrepresenting the greenhouse effect while you're the one doing it.

>The idea that the temperature is a function of the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere is your belief.
No, it's not my belief. The temperature is a function of more than just the concentration of CO2. CO2 simply happens to be the most dominant factor at this time. This can be seen in my post here >>11600553

You're a one trick pony, can you do anything else but misrepresent facts and your opponent's argument? You know, like actually presenting evidence of your claims?

You missed some questions:

Are you doing this on purpose or are you just parroting some else's lie?

What do you think the numbers [CO2 concentrations] are and what is your source?

Let's try it this way: what is "high CO2?"

>>11595302
What Einstein meant is that if you forego the principles of science; continuous study, discovery and exploration to broaden knowledge; of exercising critical thinking; of applying scientific methods; etc. all the stuff you actually **learned** at school, then what you're left with are the pre-cooked skills that you were **taught** at school -- which makes you no better than a one-trick pony.