/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9784343
Put on your glasses.

>>9784330
>>9784337

>>9784324
see picture N3
l < l0
The length traveled by light decreased for a stationary man.

I used the standard proof of the relativistic time dilation.

Hello dear friends!
I present to you my new work.
(Google Translate)

Even the speed of light decreases.
The speed of light is not a constant.

Anyone who gets into the "frozen" system (v=c) will never return from there.
But it is impossible to gets there.
If such a system exists in reality (hypothesis).

We see a man who moves very slowly and speaks very slowly.

A temperature detector sees a molecule that moves very slowly.

The faster the molecule, the higher the temperature.
A slow molecule is a small temperature.

>>9781781
>>9781744

>>9781744
But for a moving object no change occurs.
It's like another but little universe.

E=mc^2, ptotal=mc, p=mv
E0=m0c^2, ptotal=m0c, p=m0v0???

v=c
We are at rest.

Only for us:
Time freezes in inside the moving object.
Inside the object, the whole world froze.
The object does not emit waves.
The object does not emit thermal radiation.
Temperature of the object = absolute zero.

v<c
Time dilation.
The speed of processes decreases.
The velocity of the particles decreases.
The kinetic energy of the particles decreases.
The temperature decreases.

No one can refute this.
And no correct experiment will disprove this.

>>9781677
What to argue, if everything is so elementary??

It's good that everyone agreed with me.

>>9780243
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WX1BsDMTmH4

>>9780208
blablabla and pseudo-formulas

thx you

For us: water inside the moving object will boil earlier (<100C) and the pressure will be less, hah.

>>9780013
This model does not take into account the relativistic velocity. decrease.

I don't see time and energy anywhere.
I see only space and matter around.
I see electromagnetic waves and gravity.
But my inner voice tells me: "Close your eyes. What do you see now?".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GELtgLNseM

>>9780013
But this is another thing.

>>9780025

Where do you see time in the real world?
And energy?

>>9779987
This is not a consequence of the special theory of relativity.

1) v<c

The process released 1 J of energy per second in rest.

Now we are looking at the moving object.
There, this process is still going on (start in one moment for everyone).
There's only 0.8 (J) for us and for them.

And now we want tea, so we boil water.
process x N (J)
Only during this process, the temperature is the same everywhere.

2) v->c

The process released 1 (J) of energy per second in rest.

Now we are looking at the moving object.
There's only ->0 (J) for us and for them.

process x N = ->0 (J) -> 0

>>9779955
what?
Time does not exist in real. This is a theoretical thing.
And temperature is the movement of particles.

The transfer of temperature is the transfer of kinetic energy.
The temperature is the kinetic energy.

I will try to improve my work.